Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2019-10091

Summary
Assigner-apache
Assigner Org ID-f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At-16 Mar, 2020 | 13:05
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:10
Rejected At-
Credits

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:apache
Assigner Org ID:f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At:16 Mar, 2020 | 13:05
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 22:10
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
Apache Geode
Versions
Affected
  • Apache Tomcat 1.9.0
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/AImproper Certificate Validation
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@apache.org
Published At:16 Mar, 2020 | 14:15
Updated At:24 Aug, 2020 | 17:37

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.04.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

The Apache Software Foundation
apache
>>geode>>1.9.0
cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3Esecurity@apache.org
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3342077ac4798631300366be86e545d0c08753cca8fd2663867fe200%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E
Source: security@apache.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

133Records found

CVE-2021-44549
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server

Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_commons_messaging_mailApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0223
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Apr, 2019 | 15:57
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

While investigating bug PROTON-2014, we discovered that under some circumstances Apache Qpid Proton versions 0.9 to 0.27.0 (C library and its language bindings) can connect to a peer anonymously using TLS *even when configured to verify the peer certificate* while used with OpenSSL versions before 1.1.0. This means that an undetected man in the middle attack could be constructed if an attacker can arrange to intercept TLS traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-enterprise_linux_serverqpidenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linux_workstationopenstacklinuxenterprise_linux_eussatelliteenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_desktopjboss_amq_clients_2Apache Qpid Proton
CVE-2010-2086
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.30% / 78.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 May, 2010 | 18:32
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache MyFaces 1.1.7 and 1.2.8, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server and other applications, does not properly handle an unencrypted view state, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or execute arbitrary Expression Language (EL) statements via vectors that involve modifying the serialized view object.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-myfacesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2024-27309
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.79%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-12 Apr, 2024 | 06:58
Updated-30 Jul, 2025 | 03:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Kafka: Potential incorrect access control during migration from ZK mode to KRaft mode

While an Apache Kafka cluster is being migrated from ZooKeeper mode to KRaft mode, in some cases ACLs will not be correctly enforced. Two preconditions are needed to trigger the bug: 1. The administrator decides to remove an ACL 2. The resource associated with the removed ACL continues to have two or more other ACLs associated with it after the removal. When those two preconditions are met, Kafka will treat the resource as if it had only one ACL associated with it after the removal, rather than the two or more that would be correct. The incorrect condition is cleared by removing all brokers in ZK mode, or by adding a new ACL to the affected resource. Once the migration is completed, there is no metadata loss (the ACLs all remain). The full impact depends on the ACLs in use. If only ALLOW ACLs were configured during the migration, the impact would be limited to availability impact. if DENY ACLs were configured, the impact could include confidentiality and integrity impact depending on the ACLs configured, as the DENY ACLs might be ignored due to this vulnerability during the migration period.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-kafkaApache Kafkakafka
CWE ID-CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2025-49812
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2025 | 16:58
Updated-29 Jul, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HTTP Server: mod_ssl TLS upgrade attack

In some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions through to 2.4.63, an HTTP desynchronisation attack allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to hijack an HTTP session via a TLS upgrade. Only configurations using "SSLEngine optional" to enable TLS upgrades are affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.64, which removes support for TLS upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-http_serverApache HTTP Server
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2023-51437
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Feb, 2024 | 09:18
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 22:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar: Timing attack in SASL token signature verification

Observable timing discrepancy vulnerability in Apache Pulsar SASL Authentication Provider can allow an attacker to forge a SASL Role Token that will pass signature verification. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.3, 3.0.2, or 3.1.1 which fixes the issue. Users should also consider updating the configured secret in the `saslJaasServerRoleTokenSignerSecretPath` file. Any component matching an above version running the SASL Authentication Provider is affected. That includes the Pulsar Broker, Proxy, Websocket Proxy, or Function Worker. 2.11 Pulsar users should upgrade to at least 2.11.3. 3.0 Pulsar users should upgrade to at least 3.0.2. 3.1 Pulsar users should upgrade to at least 3.1.1. Any users running Pulsar 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, and earlier should upgrade to one of the above patched versions. For additional details on this attack vector, please refer to https://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ .

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CVE-2014-3504
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.07% / 86.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Aug, 2014 | 18:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The (1) serf_ssl_cert_issuer, (2) serf_ssl_cert_subject, and (3) serf_ssl_cert_certificate functions in Serf 0.2.0 through 1.3.x before 1.3.7 does not properly handle a NUL byte in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-serf_projectn/aThe Apache Software FoundationCanonical Ltd.
Product-subversionubuntu_linuxserfn/a
CVE-2014-3528
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.19% / 83.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Aug, 2014 | 18:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Subversion 1.0.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.17 and 1.8.x before 1.8.10 uses an MD5 hash of the URL and authentication realm to store cached credentials, which makes it easier for remote servers to obtain the credentials via a crafted authentication realm.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopenSUSEThe Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.Apple Inc.Canonical Ltd.
Product-enterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_hpc_nodeopensuseubuntu_linuxenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_eussubversionenterprise_linux_workstationxcoden/a
CVE-2014-3522
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.37% / 79.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Aug, 2014 | 18:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Serf RA layer in Apache Subversion 1.4.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.18 and 1.8.x before 1.8.10 does not properly handle wildcards in the Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopenSUSEThe Apache Software FoundationApple Inc.Canonical Ltd.
Product-subversionopensusexcodeubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2020-17514
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 76.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 May, 2021 | 12:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 14:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
disabled hostname verificiation

Apache Fineract prior to 1.5.0 disables HTTPS hostname verification in ProcessorHelper in the configureClient method. Under typical deployments, a man in the middle attack could be successful.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-fineractApache Fineract
CVE-2018-8034
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-13.68% / 93.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-21 Oct, 2024 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was missing. It is now enabled by default. Versions Affected: Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.31, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52, and 7.0.35 to 7.0.88.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-retail_order_brokerubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8019
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 74.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When using an OCSP responder Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle invalid responses. This allowed for revoked client certificates to be incorrectly identified. It was therefore possible for users to authenticate with revoked certificates when using mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3555
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.23% / 86.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2009 | 17:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.Debian GNU/LinuxMozilla CorporationOpenSSLF5, Inc.The Apache Software FoundationGNUFedora Project
Product-http_serverubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxopensslfedoranginxgnutlsnssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17187
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 65.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_proton-jApache Qpid Proton-J
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-49250
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2024 | 10:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 17:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache DolphinScheduler: Insecure TLS TrustManager used in HttpUtil

Because the HttpUtils class did not verify certificates, an attacker that could perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack on outgoing https connections could impersonate the server. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.2.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.1, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-dolphinschedulerApache DolphinSchedulerdolphinscheduler
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 70.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-41180
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2023 | 15:52
Updated-27 Sep, 2024 | 18:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++: Incorrect Certificate Validation in InvokeHTTP for MiNiFi C++

Incorrect certificate validation in InvokeHTTP on Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ versions 0.13 to 0.14 allows an intermediary to present a forged certificate during TLS handshake negotation. The Disable Peer Verification property of InvokeHTTP was effectively flipped, disabling verification by default, when using HTTPS. Mitigation: Set the Disable Peer Verification property of InvokeHTTP to true when using MiNiFi C++ versions 0.13.0 or 0.14.0. Upgrading to MiNiFi C++ 0.15.0 corrects the default behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-nifi_minifi_c\+\+Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3250
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 48.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Dec, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The default vhost configuration file in Puppet before 3.6.2 does not include the SSLCARevocationCheck directive, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a revoked certificate when a Puppet master runs with Apache 2.4.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-puppetlinuxhttp_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9488
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.02% / 4.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qosThe Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-retail_bulk_data_integrationpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsprimavera_unifierreload4jretail_assortment_planningstoragetek_acslspolicy_automationfinancial_services_retail_customer_analyticsfinancial_services_price_creation_and_discoverycommunications_eagle_ftp_table_base_retrievalcommunications_application_session_controllerinsurance_policy_administration_j2eepolicy_automation_for_mobile_devicesspatial_and_graphfinancial_services_analytical_applications_infrastructurecommunications_unified_inventory_managementretail_advanced_inventory_planningcommunications_services_gatekeeperretail_order_broker_cloud_serviceinsurance_insbridge_rating_and_underwritingretail_customer_management_and_segmentation_foundationretail_predictive_application_serverjd_edwards_world_securityinsurance_rules_palettecommunications_billing_and_revenue_managementcommunications_offline_mediation_controllerenterprise_manager_for_peoplesoftsiebel_apps_-_marketingsiebel_ui_frameworkflexcube_private_bankingretail_integration_busretail_eftlinkutilities_frameworkoracle_goldengate_application_adaptersfinancial_services_institutional_performance_analyticspolicy_automation_connector_for_siebelstoragetek_tape_analytics_sw_toolretail_insights_cloud_service_suiteweblogic_serverdebian_linuxhealth_sciences_information_managerflexcube_core_bankingretail_xstore_point_of_servicelog4jfinancial_services_market_risk_measurement_and_managementdata_integratorApache Log4j
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5783
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Commons HttpClient 3.x, as used in Amazon Flexible Payments Service (FPS) merchant Java SDK and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-httpclientubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33682
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 42.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-27 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Hostname Verification makes Brokers, Proxies vulnerable to MITM attack

TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connections vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak credentials, configuration data, message data, and any other data sent by these clients. The vulnerability is for both the pulsar+ssl protocol and HTTPS. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker, Proxy, and WebSocket Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-3446
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Libcloud before 0.11.1 uses an incorrect regular expression during verification of whether the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-libcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-5653
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.17% / 86.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXF
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33683
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Certificate Validation makes Broker, Proxy Admin Clients vulnerable to MITM attack

Apache Pulsar Brokers and Proxies create an internal Pulsar Admin Client that does not verify peer TLS certificates, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. The Pulsar Admin Client's intra-cluster and geo-replication HTTPS connections are vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak authentication data, configuration data, and any other data sent by these clients. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker and Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33681
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 20.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Hostname Verification in Java Client and Proxy can expose authentication data via MITM

Delayed TLS hostname verification in the Pulsar Java Client and the Pulsar Proxy make each client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. Connections from the Pulsar Java Client to the Pulsar Broker/Proxy and connections from the Pulsar Proxy to the Pulsar Broker are vulnerable. Authentication data is sent before verifying the server’s TLS certificate matches the hostname, which means authentication data could be exposed to an attacker. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. Because the client sends authentication data before performing hostname verification, an attacker could gain access to the client’s authentication data. The client eventually closes the connection when it verifies the hostname and identifies the targeted hostname does not match a hostname on the certificate. Because the client eventually closes the connection, the value of the intercepted authentication data depends on the authentication method used by the client. Token based authentication and username/password authentication methods are vulnerable because the authentication data can be used to impersonate the client in a separate session. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Java Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33684
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-02 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar C++/Python OAuth Clients prior to 3.0.0 were vulnerable to an MITM attack due to Disabled Certificate Validation

The Apache Pulsar C++ Client does not verify peer TLS certificates when making HTTPS calls for the OAuth2.0 Client Credential Flow, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack and intercept and/or modify the GET request that is sent to the ClientCredentialFlow 'issuer url'. The intercepted credentials can be used to acquire authentication data from the OAuth2.0 server to then authenticate with an Apache Pulsar cluster. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. The Apache Pulsar Python Client wraps the C++ client, so it is also vulnerable in the same way. This issue affects Apache Pulsar C++ Client and Python Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0 to 2.10.1; 2.6.4 and earlier. Any users running affected versions of the C++ Client or the Python Client should rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials, including client_id and client_secret. 2.7 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.7.5 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.8 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.8.4 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.9 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.9.3 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.10 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.10.2 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 3.0 C++ users are unaffected and 3.0 Python Client users will be unaffected when it is released. Any users running the C++ and Python Client for 2.6 or less should upgrade to one of the above patched versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32531
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 32.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2022 | 10:17
Updated-17 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache BookKeeper: Java Client Uses Connection to Host that Failed Hostname Verification

The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (before 4.14.6 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper client prior to versions 4.14.6 and 4.15.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-bookkeeperApache BookKeeper
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-39441
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2023 | 15:39
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow SMTP Provider, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider, Apache Airflow: SMTP/IMAP client components allowed MITM due to missing Certificate Validation

Apache Airflow SMTP Provider before 1.3.0, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider before 3.3.0, and Apache Airflow before 2.7.0 are affected by the Validation of OpenSSL Certificate vulnerability. The default SSL context with SSL library did not check a server's X.509 certificate.  Instead, the code accepted any certificate, which could result in the disclosure of mail server credentials or mail contents when the client connects to an attacker in a MITM position. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to Apache Airflow version 2.7.0 or newer, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider version 3.3.0 or newer, and Apache Airflow SMTP Provider version 1.3.0 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-smtpairflowapache-airflow-providers-imapApache Airflow SMTP ProviderApache AirflowApache Airflow IMAP Provider
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1929
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jan, 2020 | 18:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Apache Beam MongoDB connector in versions 2.10.0 to 2.16.0 has an option to disable SSL trust verification. However this configuration is not respected and the certificate verification disables trust verification in every case. This exclusion also gets registered globally which disables trust checking for any code running in the same JVM.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-beamBeam
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1952
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.65% / 81.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2020 | 16:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was found in Apache IoTDB .9.0 to 0.9.1 and 0.8.0 to 0.8.2. When starting IoTDB, the JMX port 31999 is exposed with no certification.Then, clients could execute code remotely.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-iotdbIoTDB
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13955
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 68.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2020 | 12:33
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HttpUtils#getURLConnection method disables explicitly hostname verification for HTTPS connections making clients vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. Calcite uses internally this method to connect with Druid and Splunk so information leakage may happen when using the respective Calcite adapters. The method itself is in a utility class so people may use it to create vulnerable HTTPS connections for other applications. From Apache Calcite 1.26 onwards, the hostname verification will be performed using the default JVM truststore.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-calciteApache Calcite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8020
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.58% / 80.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 has a flaw that does not properly check OCSP pre-produced responses, which are lists (multiple entries) of certificate statuses. Subsequently, revoked client certificates may not be properly identified, allowing for users to authenticate with revoked certificates to connections that require mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-17560
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.92% / 82.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:39
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not validate SSL certificates and hostnames for https based downloads. This allows an attacker to intercept downloads of autoupdates and modify the download, potentially injecting malicious code. “Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-15698
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.83% / 73.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jan, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When parsing the AIA-Extension field of a client certificate, Apache Tomcat Native Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.14 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle fields longer than 127 bytes. The result of the parsing error was to skip the OCSP check. It was therefore possible for client certificates that should have been rejected (if the OCSP check had been made) to be accepted. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-4467
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The C client and C-based client bindings in the Apache Qpid Proton library before 0.13.1 on Windows do not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate when using the SChannel-based security layer, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_protonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-29733
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-2.7||LOW
EPSS-0.08% / 23.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2024 | 17:21
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 18:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow FTP Provider: FTP_TLS instance with unverified SSL context

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Apache Airflow FTP Provider. The FTP hook lacks complete certificate validation in FTP_TLS connections, which can potentially be leveraged. Implementing proper certificate validation by passing context=ssl.create_default_context() during FTP_TLS instantiation is used as mitigation to validate the certificates properly. This issue affects Apache Airflow FTP Provider: before 3.7.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.7.0, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-ftpApache Airflow FTP Providerairflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25141
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.07% / 22.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2024 | 20:30
Updated-28 Apr, 2025 | 18:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow Mongo Provider: Certificate validation isn't respected even if SSL is enabled for apache-airflow-providers-mongo

When ssl was enabled for Mongo Hook, default settings included "allow_insecure" which caused that certificates were not validated. This was unexpected and undocumented. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-mongoApache Airflow Mongo Providerairflow_mongo_provider
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-28021
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2024 | 13:30
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server that affects the message queueing mechanism’s certificate validation. If exploited an attacker could spoof a trusted entity causing a loss of confidentiality and integrity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-foxman-unfoxman_ununemFOXMAN-UNUNEMfoxman-ununem
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-11086
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2020 | 19:34
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

lib/oauth/consumer.rb in the oauth-ruby gem through 0.5.4 for Ruby does not verify server X.509 certificates if a certificate bundle cannot be found, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oauth-ruby_projectn/a
Product-oauth-rubyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-31 Mar, 2025 | 16:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in pyload/pyload

Improper Certificate Validation in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev44.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pyload-ng_projectpyloadpyload
Product-pyload-ngpyloadpyload/pyload
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2024 | 02:44
Updated-08 May, 2025 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in SAP Cloud Connector

Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-cloud_connectorSAP Cloud Connector
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-54809
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 22.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2025 | 14:46
Updated-13 Aug, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
F5 Access for Android vulnerability

F5 Access for Android before version 3.1.2 which uses HTTPS does not verify the remote endpoint identity. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-F5 Access
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6056
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 17.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:31
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Self-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11164)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of self-signed certificates. The product is found to trust certificates signed with the RIPEMD-160 hashing algorithm without proper validation, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6057
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 20.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:38
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of DSA-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11166)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of certificates issued using the DSA signature algorithm. The product does not properly check the certificate chain, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites using a DSA-signed certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6055
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:17
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11158)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software fails to properly validate website certificates. Specifically, if a site certificate lacks the "Server Authentication" specification in the Extended Key Usage extension, the product does not verify the certificate's compliance with the site, deeming such certificates as valid. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found