Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-15957

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-30 Jul, 2020 | 13:08
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected At-
Credits

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:30 Jul, 2020 | 13:08
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:30 Jul, 2020 | 14:15
Updated At:05 Aug, 2020 | 18:47

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_project
dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_project
>>dp3t-backend-software_development_kit>>Versions before 1.1.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_project:dp3t-backend-software_development_kit:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0cve@mitre.org
Release Notes
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3cve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backendcve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/compare/v1.0.4...v1.1.0
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/DP-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-5m5q-3qw2-3xf3
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/dp-3T/dp3t-sdk-backend
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

88Records found

CVE-2021-41832
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 74.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Certificate Validation Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate documents to appear to be signed by a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25635 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41830
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 74.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double Certificate Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate signed documents and macros to appear to come from a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25633 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.44% / 80.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate the timestamp of signed documents. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25634 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-34433
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2021 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-californiumEclipse Californium
CWE ID-CWE-322
Key Exchange without Entity Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-33054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 53.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:40
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-inversen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxsogon/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-30130
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.43% / 62.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpseclibn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxphpseclibn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29500
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 20:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature

bubble fireworks is an open source java package relating to Spring Framework. In bubble fireworks before version 2021.BUILD-SNAPSHOT there is a vulnerability in which the package did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows to forgery of valid JWTs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bubble_fireworks_projectfxbin
Product-bubble_fireworksbubble-fireworks
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29455
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 41.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2021 | 19:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature in `grassrootza/grassroot-platform`

Grassroot Platform is an application to make it faster, cheaper and easier to persistently organize and mobilize people in low-income communities. Grassroot Platform before master deployment as of 2021-04-16 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens when refreshing an existing JWT. This allows to forge a valid JWT. The problem has been patched in version 1.3.1 by deprecating the JWT refresh function, which was an overdue deprecation regardless (the "refresh" flow is no longer used).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grassrootgrassrootza
Product-grassroot_platformgrassroot-platform
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 38.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-9153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 58.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openpgpjsn/a
Product-openpgpjsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-49079
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.14% / 33.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2023 | 18:56
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user.

Misskey is an open source, decentralized social media platform. Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user. This issue has been patched in version 2023.11.1-beta.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-misskeymisskey-dev
Product-misskeymisskey
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-46234
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.59% / 69.21%
||
7 Day CHG+0.18%
Published-26 Oct, 2023 | 14:31
Updated-10 Apr, 2025 | 20:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
browserify-sign vulnerable via an upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` that leads to a signature forgery attack

browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of node's crypto public key functions, much of this is based on Fedor Indutny's work on indutny/tls.js. An upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` function allows an attacker to construct signatures that can be successfully verified by any public key, thus leading to a signature forgery attack. All places in this project that involve DSA verification of user-input signatures will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-browserifybrowserifyDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxbrowserify-signbrowserify-sign
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-21405
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 21:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BLS Signature "Malleability"

Lotus is an Implementation of the Filecoin protocol written in Go. BLS signature validation in lotus uses blst library method VerifyCompressed. This method accepts signatures in 2 forms: "serialized", and "compressed", meaning that BLS signatures can be provided as either of 2 unique byte arrays. Lotus block validation functions perform a uniqueness check on provided blocks. Two blocks are considered distinct if the CIDs of their blockheader do not match. The CID method for blockheader includes the BlockSig of the block. The result of these issues is that it would be possible to punish miners for valid blocks, as there are two different valid block CIDs available for each block, even though this must be unique. By switching from the go based `blst` bindings over to the bindings in `filecoin-ffi`, the code paths now ensure that all signatures are compressed by size and the way they are deserialized. This happened in https://github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/pull/5393.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filecoinfilecoin-project
Product-lotuslotus
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-39393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 9.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-13 Aug, 2023 | 11:34
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 14:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the ServiceWifiResources module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause ServiceWifiResources to be maliciously modified and overwritten.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-39392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 9.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-13 Aug, 2023 | 11:33
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 14:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the OsuLogin module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause OsuLogin to be maliciously modified and overwritten.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-16
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-15545
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2019 | 17:07
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the libp2p-core crate before 0.8.1 for Rust. Attackers can spoof ed25519 signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libp2pn/a
Product-libp2pn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-40012
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 16.50%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-09 Aug, 2023 | 15:33
Updated-03 Oct, 2024 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
uthenticode EKU validation bypass

uthenticode is a small cross-platform library for partially verifying Authenticode digital signatures. Versions of uthenticode prior to the 2.x series did not check Extended Key Usages in certificates, in violation of the Authenticode X.509 certificate profile. As a result, a malicious user could produce a "signed" PE file that uthenticode would verify and consider valid using an X.509 certificate that isn't entitled to produce code signatures (e.g., a SSL certificate). By design, uthenticode does not perform full-chain validation. However, the absence of EKU validation was an unintended oversight. The 2.0.0 release series includes EKU checks. There are no workarounds to this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trailofbitstrailofbits
Product-uthenticodeuthenticode
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-325
Missing Cryptographic Step
CVE-2020-14515
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 24.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 19:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CodeMeter (All versions prior to 6.90 when using CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code) has an issue in the license-file signature checking mechanism, which allows attackers to build arbitrary license files, including forging a valid license file as if it were a valid license file of an existing vendor. Only CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wibun/a
Product-codemeterCodeMeter
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-15093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 18:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper verification of signature threshold in tough

The tough library (Rust/crates.io) prior to version 0.7.1 does not properly verify the threshold of cryptographic signatures. It allows an attacker to duplicate a valid signature in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique signatures before the metadata is considered valid. A fix is available in version 0.7.1. CVE-2020-6174 is assigned to the same vulnerability in the TUF reference implementation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonawslabs
Product-toughtough
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-7644
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 37.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Mar, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The XmlSecLibs library as used in the saml2 library in SimpleSAMLphp before 1.15.3 incorrectly verifies signatures on SAML assertions, allowing a remote attacker to construct a crafted SAML assertion on behalf of an Identity Provider that would pass as cryptographically valid, thereby allowing them to impersonate a user from that Identity Provider, aka a key confusion issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-simplesamlphpn/a
Product-simplesamlphpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13845
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2020 | 17:23
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabsn/a
Product-singularityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-7340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2019 | 14:01
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Multiple SAML libraries may allow authentication bypass via incorrect XML canonicalization and DOM traversal

Duo Network Gateway 1.2.9 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Duo SecurityCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-duo_network_gatewayDuo Network Gateway
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-11755
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.41% / 61.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2019 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A crafted S/MIME message consisting of an inner encryption layer and an outer SignedData layer was shown as having a valid digital signature, although the signer might have had no access to the contents of the encrypted message, and might have stripped a different signature from the encrypted message. Previous versions had only suppressed showing a digital signature for messages with an outer multipart/signed layer. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 68.1.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-thunderbirdThunderbird
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-5387
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jul, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Wizkunde SAMLBase may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wizkundeWizkunde
Product-samlbaseSAMLBase
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2181
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 58.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco 7940/7960 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ip_phone_7940_firmwareip_phone_7940ip_phone_7960ip_phone_7960_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-17561
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 72.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:44
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not fully validate code signatures. An attacker could modify the downloaded nbm and include additional code. "Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-3756
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hyperledger Iroha versions v1.0_beta and v1.0.0_beta-1 are vulnerable to transaction and block signature verification bypass in the transaction and block validator allowing a single node to sign a transaction and/or block multiple times, each with a random nonce, and have other validating nodes accept them as separate valid signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgern/a
Product-irohan/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2182
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 60.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Grandstream BudgeTone (BT) 100 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grandstreamn/a
Product-bt-100_firmwarebt-100n/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-12269
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 50.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2019 | 19:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Enigmail before 2.0.11 allows PGP signature spoofing: for an inline PGP message, an attacker can cause the product to display a "correctly signed" message indication, but display different unauthenticated text.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-enigmailn/a
Product-enigmailn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-65945
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.19%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-04 Dec, 2025 | 18:45
Updated-09 Mar, 2026 | 21:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
auth0/node-jws improper HMAC signature verification vulnerability

auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the HS256 algorithm under specific conditions. Applications are affected when they use the jws.createVerify() function for HMAC algorithms and use user-provided data from the JSON Web Signature protected header or payload in HMAC secret lookup routines, which can allow attackers to bypass signature verification. This issue has been patched in versions 3.2.3 and 4.0.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-auth0auth0
Product-node-jwsnode-jws
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-47949
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.18% / 39.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2025 | 19:28
Updated-19 Sep, 2025 | 17:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
samlify SAML Signature Wrapping attack

samlify is a Node.js library for SAML single sign-on. A Signature Wrapping attack has been found in samlify prior to version 2.10.0, allowing an attacker to forge a SAML Response to authenticate as any user. An attacker would need a signed XML document by the identity provider. Version 2.10.0 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-samlify_projecttngan
Product-samlifysamlify
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-21134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 60.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 19:10
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 19:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A firmware update vulnerability exists in the &quot;update&quot; firmware checks functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to firmware update. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aReolink Innovation Limited
Product-rlc-410w_firmwarerlc-410wn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-37568
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jun, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

lepture Authlib before 1.3.1 has algorithm confusion with asymmetric public keys. Unless an algorithm is specified in a jwt.decode call, HMAC verification is allowed with any asymmetric public key. (This is similar to CVE-2022-29217 and CVE-2024-33663.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authlibn/alepture
Product-authlibn/aauthlib
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-23456
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 17.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:21
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 21:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Signature validation issue leads to Anti-Tampering bypass

Anti-tampering can be disabled under certain conditions without signature validation. This affects Zscaler Client Connector <4.2.0.190 with anti-tampering enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zscaler, Inc.
Product-client_connectorClient Connectorclient_connector
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2017-16005
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Http-signature is a "Reference implementation of Joyent's HTTP Signature Scheme". In versions <=0.9.11, http-signature signs only the header values, but not the header names. This makes http-signature vulnerable to header forgery. Thus, if an attacker can intercept a request, he can swap header names and change the meaning of the request without changing the signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-joyentHackerOne
Product-http-signaturehttp-signature node module
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-31172
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2022 | 13:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OpenZeppelin Contracts's SignatureChecker may revert on invalid EIP-1271 signers

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openzeppelinOpenZeppelin
Product-contractsopenzeppelin-contracts
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-44878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pac4jn/a
Product-pac4jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found