Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions below 1.3, Mermaid (which is used to render diagrams) allows embedding images which then get rendered by Cursor in the chat box. An attacker can use this to exfiltrate sensitive information to a third-party attacker controlled server through an image fetch after successfully performing a prompt injection. A malicious model (or hallucination/backdoor) might also trigger this exploit at will. This issue requires prompt injection from malicious data (web, image upload, source code) in order to exploit. In that case, it can send sensitive information to an attacker-controlled external server. This is fixed in version 1.3.

CData RSB Connect v22.0.8336 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and 6.3 have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

SysJust Syuan-Gu-Da-Shih, versions before 20191223, contain vulnerability of Request Forgery, allowing attackers to launch inquiries into network architecture or system files of the server via forged inquests.

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

The Omni Commerce Connect API (OCC) of SAP Hybris Commerce, versions 6.*, is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. This is due to a misconfiguration of XML parser that is used in the server-side implementation of OCC.

An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS 7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block DNS hostnames associated with private and reserved IP addresses, as demonstrated by 127.0.0.1 in an A record. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14858.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Central Management Console, BI Launchpad and Fiori BI Launchpad, 4.10, from 4.20, from 4.30, could allow a malicious user to use common techniques to determine which ports are in use on the backend server.

The package @isomorphic-git/cors-proxy before 2.7.1 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing sanitization and validation of the redirection action in middleware.js.

All versions of package github.com/thecodingmachine/gotenberg are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the /convert/html endpoint when the src attribute of an HTML element refers to an internal system file, such as <iframe src='file:///etc/passwd'>.

An SSRF issue was discovered in tecrail Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 via the upload.php url parameter. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-15495.

The Dundas BI server before 5.0.1.1010 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack, allowing an attacker to forge arbitrary requests (with certain restrictions) that will be executed on behalf of the attacker, via the viewUrl parameter of the "export the dashboard as an image" feature. This could be leveraged to provide a proxy to attack other servers (internal or external) or to perform network scans of external or internal networks.

The setup script for phpMyAdmin before 4.0.10.19, 4.4.x before 4.4.15.10, and 4.6.x before 4.6.6 allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors.

axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative URLs.

JetBrains TeamCity Plugin before 2020.2.85695 SSRF. Vulnerability that could potentially expose user credentials.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5 and earlier have a blind server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

An SSRF vulnerability in webhooks in Gitea through 1.5.0-rc2 and Gogs through 0.11.53 allows remote attackers to access intranet services.

A vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance 6.5 SP2 could allow an attacker to send requests that appear to come from the localhost which could expose the product's admin interface to users who would not normally have access.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba Airwave Software version(s): Prior to 1.3.2.

An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS before V7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block private and reserved IP addresses such as 10.0.0.0/8. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14514.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PhonePe PhonePe Payment Solutions.This issue affects PhonePe Payment Solutions: from n/a through 1.0.15.

AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. Prior to 0.6.1, AutoGPT allows SSRF due to DNS Rebinding in requests wrapper. AutoGPT is built with a wrapper around Python's requests library, hardening the application against SSRF. The code for this wrapper can be found in autogpt_platform/backend/backend/util/request.py. The requested hostname of a URL which is being requested is validated, ensuring that it does not resolve to any local ipv4 or ipv6 addresses. However, this check is not sufficient, as a DNS server may initially respond with a non-blocked address, with a TTL of 0. This means that the initial resolution would appear as a non-blocked address. In this case, validate_url() will return the url as successful. After validate_url() has successfully returned the url, the url is then passed to the real request() function. When the real request() function is called with the validated url, request() will once again resolve the address of the hostname, because the record will not have been cached (due to TTL 0). This resolution may be in the "invalid range". This type of attack is called a "DNS Rebinding Attack". This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.1.

A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run Java code from untrusted SVG via JavaScript. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16.

ControlID iDSecure On-premises versions 4.7.48.0 and prior are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve information from other servers.

An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. The API to configure external mail accounts can be abused to map and access network components within the trust boundary of the operator. Users can inject arbitrary hosts and ports to API calls. Depending on the response type, content and latency, information about existence of hosts and services can be gathered. Attackers can get internal configuration information about the infrastructure of an operator to prepare subsequent attacks.

A vulnerability has been identified in syngo Dynamics (All versions < VA40G HF01). An unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in one of the web services exposed on the syngo Dynamics application that could allow for the leaking of NTLM credentials as well as local service enumeration.

A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the backup & restore functionality in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.3.0 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs. In addition, this could potentially allow an attacker to read sensitive zip files from the local server.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Microsoft Power Apps allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14.

Stirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files. Prior to version 0.45.0, Stirling-PDF is vulnerable to SSRF-induced arbitrary file read. WeasyPrint redefines a set of HTML tags, including img, embed, object, and others. The references to several files inside, allow the attachment of content from any webpage or local file to a PDF. This allows the attacker to read any file on the server, including sensitive files and configuration files. All users utilizing this feature will be affected. This issue has been patched in version 0.45.0.

The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/get.php?subdomain=SSRF.

Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212.

Prior to version 10.9.0, the sharing/rest/content/features/analyze endpoint is always accessible to anonymous users, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to induce Esri Portal for ArcGIS to read arbitrary URLs.

Gophish before 0.11.0 allows SSRF attacks.

Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.9.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212.

The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains a blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/detail.php?subdomain=SSRF.

Appwrite <= v1.4.13 is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the '/v1/avatars/favicon' endpoint due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2023-27159.

Some Dahua software products have a vulnerability of server-side request forgery (SSRF). An Attacker can access internal resources by concatenating links (URL) that conform to specific rules.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

2FAuth is a web app to manage Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) accounts and generate their security codes. Two interconnected vulnerabilities exist in version 5.4.1 a SSRF and URI validation bypass issue. The endpoint at POST /api/v1/twofaccounts/preview allows setting a remote URI to retrieve the image of a 2fa site. By abusing this functionality, it is possible to force the application to make a GET request to an arbitrary URL, whose content will be stored in an image file in the server if it looks like an image. Additionally, the library does some basic validation on the URI, attempting to filter our URIs which do not have an image extension. However, this can be easily bypassed by appending the string `#.svg` to the URI. The combination of these two issues allows an attacker to retrieve URIs accessible from the application, as long as their content type is text based. If not, the request is still sent, but the response is not reflected to the attacker. Version 5.4.1 fixes the issues.

A vulnerability was found in playeduxyz PlayEdu 开源培训系统 up to 1.8 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/backend/v1/user/create of the component User Avatar Handler. The manipulation of the argument Avatar leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve a cleartext password from an affected system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71044.

The Canto plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress contains blind SSRF vulnerability. It allows an unauthenticated attacker can make a request to any internal and external server via /includes/lib/tree.php?subdomain=SSRF.

An improper authorization vulnerability exists in Jenkins versions 2.106 and earlier, and LTS 2.89.3 and earlier, that allows an attacker to have Jenkins submit HTTP GET requests and get limited information about the response.

MISP through 2.4.133 allows SSRF in the REST client via the use_full_path parameter with an arbitrary URL.

Databasir is a database metadata management platform. Databasir <= 1.06 has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The SSRF is triggered by a sending a **single** HTTP POST request to create a databaseType. By supplying a `jdbcDriverFileUrl` that returns a non `200` response code, the url is executed, the response is logged (both in terminal and in database) and is included in the response. This would allow an attackers to obtain the real IP address and scan Intranet information. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7.

JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10643 was vulnerable to SSRF that allowed scanning internal ports.

The inclusion of the web scraper for AnythingLLM means that any user with the proper authorization level (manager, admin, and when in single user) could put in the URL ``` http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/identity-credentials/ec2/security-credentials/ec2-instance ``` which is a special IP and URL that resolves only when the request comes from within an EC2 instance. This would allow the user to see the connection/secret credentials for their specific instance and be able to manage it regardless of who deployed it. The user would have to have pre-existing knowledge of the hosting infra which the target instance is deployed on, but if sent - would resolve if on EC2 and the proper `iptable` or firewall rule is not configured for their setup.