Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-28042

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-01 Nov, 2020 | 04:50
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected At-
Credits

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:01 Nov, 2020 | 04:50
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:02 Nov, 2020 | 21:15
Updated At:17 Nov, 2020 | 17:55

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

servicestack
servicestack
>>servicestack>>Versions before 5.9.2(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:servicestack:servicestack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850cve@mitre.org
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585eecve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

70Records found

CVE-2017-16005
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Http-signature is a "Reference implementation of Joyent's HTTP Signature Scheme". In versions <=0.9.11, http-signature signs only the header values, but not the header names. This makes http-signature vulnerable to header forgery. Thus, if an attacker can intercept a request, he can swap header names and change the meaning of the request without changing the signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-joyentHackerOne
Product-http-signaturehttp-signature node module
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-33054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:40
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-inversen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxsogon/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-30130
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpseclibn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxphpseclibn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-15545
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2019 | 17:07
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the libp2p-core crate before 0.8.1 for Rust. Attackers can spoof ed25519 signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libp2pn/a
Product-libp2pn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2017-17848
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 74.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Dec, 2017 | 23:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. In a variant of CVE-2017-17847, signature spoofing is possible for multipart/related messages because a signed message part can be referenced with a cid: URI but not actually displayed. In other words, the entire containing message appears to be signed, but the recipient does not see any of the signed text.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-enigmailn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-enigmaildebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2025-24015
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 26.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2025 | 22:48
Updated-09 Jun, 2025 | 15:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Deno's AES GCM authentication tags are not verified

Deno is a JavaScript, TypeScript, and WebAssembly runtime. Versions 1.46.0 through 2.1.6 have an issue that affects AES-256-GCM and AES-128-GCM in Deno in which the authentication tag is not being validated. This means tampered ciphertexts or incorrect keys might not be detected, which breaks the guarantees expected from AES-GCM. Older versions of Deno correctly threw errors in such cases, as does Node.js. Without authentication tag verification, AES-GCM degrades to essentially CTR mode, removing integrity protection. Authenticated data set with set_aad is also affected, as it is incorporated into the GCM hash (ghash) but this too is not validated, rendering AAD checks ineffective. Version 2.1.7 includes a patch that addresses this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-denodenoland
Product-denodeno
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2016-1000342
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.33% / 55.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 17:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bouncycastlen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxbc-javan/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2016-1000338
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.43% / 61.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2018 | 00:00
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 14:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bouncycastlen/aRed Hat, Inc.NetApp, Inc.Canonical Ltd.
Product-satellite_capsulesatellite7-mode_transition_toolubuntu_linuxlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-apin/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-39200
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 6.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Sep, 2022 | 20:10
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Signature checks not applied to some retrieved missing events

Dendrite is a Matrix homeserver written in Go. In affected versions events retrieved from a remote homeserver using the `/get_missing_events` path did not have their signatures verified correctly. This could potentially allow a remote homeserver to provide invalid/modified events to Dendrite via this endpoint. Note that this does not apply to events retrieved through other endpoints (e.g. `/event`, `/state`) as they have been correctly verified. Homeservers that have federation disabled are not vulnerable. The problem has been fixed in Dendrite 0.9.8. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Matrix.org Foundation
Product-dendritedendrite
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24773
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.22%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not properly check `DigestInfo` for a proper ASN.1 structure. This can lead to successful verification with signatures that contain invalid structures but a valid digest. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24772
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 25.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24771
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 24.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in node-forge

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24884
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.09% / 25.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 May, 2022 | 23:50
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Trivial signature forgery in ecdsautils

ecdsautils is a tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify). `ecdsa_verify_[prepare_]legacy()` does not check whether the signature values `r` and `s` are non-zero. A signature consisting only of zeroes is always considered valid, making it trivial to forge signatures. Requiring multiple signatures from different public keys does not mitigate the issue: `ecdsa_verify_list_legacy()` will accept an arbitrary number of such forged signatures. Both the `ecdsautil verify` CLI command and the libecdsautil library are affected. The issue has been fixed in ecdsautils 0.4.1. All older versions of ecdsautils (including versions before the split into a library and a CLI utility) are vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecdsautils_projectfreifunk-gluonFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ecdsautilsdebian_linuxfedoraecdsautils
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-16152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.20% / 78.04%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-26 Sep, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-strongswann/aCanonical Ltd.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-strongswandebian_linuxubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-21134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 59.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 19:10
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 19:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A firmware update vulnerability exists in the &quot;update&quot; firmware checks functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to firmware update. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aReolink Innovation Limited
Product-rlc-410w_firmwarerlc-410wn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-14966
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 50.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2020 | 11:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package through 8.0.18 for Node.js. It allows a malleability in ECDSA signatures by not checking overflows in the length of a sequence and '0' characters appended or prepended to an integer. The modified signatures are verified as valid. This could have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jsrsasign_projectn/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-max_datajsrsasignn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-44878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 10.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pac4jn/a
Product-pac4jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-49394
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 18.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 02:07
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Mutt: neomutt: in-reply-to email header field it not protected by cryptograpic signing

In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-neomuttmuttRed Hat, Inc.
Product-enterprise_linuxmuttneomuttRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-21405
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 21:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BLS Signature "Malleability"

Lotus is an Implementation of the Filecoin protocol written in Go. BLS signature validation in lotus uses blst library method VerifyCompressed. This method accepts signatures in 2 forms: "serialized", and "compressed", meaning that BLS signatures can be provided as either of 2 unique byte arrays. Lotus block validation functions perform a uniqueness check on provided blocks. Two blocks are considered distinct if the CIDs of their blockheader do not match. The CID method for blockheader includes the BlockSig of the block. The result of these issues is that it would be possible to punish miners for valid blocks, as there are two different valid block CIDs available for each block, even though this must be unique. By switching from the go based `blst` bindings over to the bindings in `filecoin-ffi`, the code paths now ensure that all signatures are compressed by size and the way they are deserialized. This happened in https://github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/pull/5393.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filecoinfilecoin-project
Product-lotuslotus
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found