Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-8987

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-09 Mar, 2020 | 16:38
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected At-
Credits

Avast AntiTrack before 1.5.1.172 and AVG Antitrack before 2.0.0.178 proxies traffic to HTTPS sites but does not validate certificates, and thus a man-in-the-middle can host a malicious website using a self-signed certificate. No special action necessary by the victim using AntiTrack with "Allow filtering of HTTPS traffic for tracking detection" enabled. (This is the default configuration.)

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:09 Mar, 2020 | 16:38
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Avast AntiTrack before 1.5.1.172 and AVG Antitrack before 2.0.0.178 proxies traffic to HTTPS sites but does not validate certificates, and thus a man-in-the-middle can host a malicious website using a self-signed certificate. No special action necessary by the victim using AntiTrack with "Allow filtering of HTTPS traffic for tracking detection" enabled. (This is the default configuration.)

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avast
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.html
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avast
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avast
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avast
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:09 Mar, 2020 | 17:15
Updated At:10 Mar, 2020 | 18:34

Avast AntiTrack before 1.5.1.172 and AVG Antitrack before 2.0.0.178 proxies traffic to HTTPS sites but does not validate certificates, and thus a man-in-the-middle can host a malicious website using a self-signed certificate. No special action necessary by the victim using AntiTrack with "Allow filtering of HTTPS traffic for tracking detection" enabled. (This is the default configuration.)

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.8MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.8
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

avast
avast
>>antitrack>>Versions before 1.5.1.172(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:avast:antitrack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
avast
avast
>>avg_antitrack>>Versions before 2.0.0.178(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:avast:avg_antitrack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avastcve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.htmlcve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.avast.com/hacker-hall-of-fame/en/researcher-david-eade-reports-antitrack-bug-to-avast
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.davideade.com/2020/03/avast-antitrack.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

154Records found

CVE-2024-50691
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 5.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SunGrow iSolarCloud Android app V2.1.6.20241104 and prior suffers from Missing SSL Certificate Validation. The app explicitly ignores certificate errors and is vulnerable to MiTM attacks. Attackers can impersonate the iSolarCloud server and communicate with the Android app.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sungrowpowern/a
Product-isolarcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-10334
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2019 | 13:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins ElectricFlow Plugin 1.1.5 and earlier disabled SSL/TLS and hostname verification globally for the Jenkins master JVM when MultipartUtility.java is used to upload files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-electricflowJenkins ElectricFlow Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2018-8970
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The int_x509_param_set_hosts function in lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vpm.c in LibreSSL 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 does not support a certain special case of a zero name length, which causes silent omission of hostname verification, and consequently allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. NOTE: the LibreSSL documentation indicates that this special case is supported, but the BoringSSL documentation does not.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpenBSD
Product-libressln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4094
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 29.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jun, 2015 | 14:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Thycotic Password Manager Secret Server application through 2.3 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-thycoticn/a
Product-secret_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-26117
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.94% / 75.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2020 | 03:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx and rfb/CSecurityTLS.java in TigerVNC before 1.11.0, viewers mishandle TLS certificate exceptions. They store the certificates as authorities, meaning that the owner of a certificate could impersonate any server after a client had added an exception.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tigervncn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSE
Product-tigervncdebian_linuxleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13163
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2020 | 21:22
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

em-imap 0.5 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library. The hostname in a TLS server certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-em-imap_projectn/a
Product-em-imapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-1266
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-19.48% / 95.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2014 | 15:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The SSLVerifySignedServerKeyExchange function in libsecurity_ssl/lib/sslKeyExchange.c in the Secure Transport feature in the Data Security component in Apple iOS 6.x before 6.1.6 and 7.x before 7.0.6, Apple TV 6.x before 6.0.2, and Apple OS X 10.9.x before 10.9.2 does not check the signature in a TLS Server Key Exchange message, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by (1) using an arbitrary private key for the signing step or (2) omitting the signing step.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_osmac_os_xtvosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 27.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-palantirPalantir
Product-atlasdbAtlasDB
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-0363
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.82% / 85.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Apr, 2014 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-igniterealtimen/a
Product-smackn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999035
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 11.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Inedo BuildMaster Plugin 1.3 and earlier in BuildMasterConfiguration.java, BuildMasterConfig.java, BuildMasterApi.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-inedo_buildmastern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-7201
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 74.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 18:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

WebHybridClient.java in PayPal 5.3 and earlier for Android ignores SSL errors, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-paypaln/a
Product-paypaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-14516
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2019 | 13:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mAadhaar application 1.2.7 for Android lacks SSL Certificate Validation, leading to man-in-the-middle attacks against requests for FAQs or Help.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-uidain/a
Product-maadhaarn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jun, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Burp Suite Community Edition 1.7.32 and 1.7.33 fail to validate the server certificate in a couple of HTTPS requests which allows a man in the middle to modify or view traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-portswiggerTenable, Inc.
Product-burp_suiteBurp Suite Community Edition
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 70.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 30.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2022 | 00:20
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: Certificate validation is skipped when fetching system scripts from a HTTPS URL

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2020-2252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 8.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 13:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 07:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins Mailer Plugin 1.32 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured SMTP server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-mailerJenkins Mailer Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1566
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2021 | 17:45
Updated-07 Nov, 2024 | 22:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Web Security Appliance Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints integration of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept traffic between an affected device and the AMP servers. This vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation when an affected device establishes TLS connections. A man-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to spoof a trusted host and then extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-asyncosemail_security_applianceweb_security_applianceCisco Web Security Appliance (WSA)
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0434
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Oct, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-26 Nov, 2024 | 14:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SD-WAN Solution Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Zero Touch Provisioning feature of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data by using an invalid certificate. The vulnerability is due to insufficient certificate validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-vedge_2000vedge_100_firmwarevedge_5000_firmwarevedge_1000_firmwarevmanage_network_management_systemvedge_5000vedge_100vedge_2000_firmwarevedge_1000Cisco SD-WAN Solution
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7513
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that Satellite 5 configured with SSL/TLS for the PostgreSQL backend failed to correctly validate X.509 server certificate host name fields. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a PostgreSQL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-satelliteRed Hat Satellite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Oct, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In F5 BIG-IP PEM 12.1.0 through 12.1.2 when downloading the Type Allocation Code (TAC) database file via HTTPS, the server's certificate is not verified. Attackers in a privileged network position may be able to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against these connections. TAC databases are used in BIG-IP PEM for Device Type and OS (DTOS) and Tethering detection. Customers not using BIG-IP PEM, not configuring downloads of TAC database files, or not using HTTP for that download are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_policy_enforcement_managerF5 BIG-IP PEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5810
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Chase mobile banking application for Android does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to overriding the default X509TrustManager. NOTE: this vulnerability was fixed in the summer of 2012, but the version number was not changed or is not known.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jpmorganchasen/a
Product-chase_mobilen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1887
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Meta Platforms, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Meta Platforms, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.11% / 30.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2020 | 23:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Incorrect validation of the TLS SNI hostname in osquery versions after 2.9.0 and before 4.2.0 could allow an attacker to MITM osquery traffic in the absence of a configured root chain of trust.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Linux FoundationFacebook
Product-osqueryOsquery
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6142
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

X509 certificate verification was not correctly implemented in the early access "user id" feature in the F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager versions 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, and 11.6.0-11.6.2, and thus did not properly validate the remote server's identity on certain versions of BIG-IP.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_firewall_managerBIG-IP AFM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-2253
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 8.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 13:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 07:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins Email Extension Plugin 2.75 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured SMTP server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-email_extensionJenkins Email Extension Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5822
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The contribution feature in Zamboni does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to use of the Python urllib2 library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-zambonin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 18.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-4586
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 10:46
Updated-23 Nov, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Hotrod-client: hot rod client does not enable hostname validation when using tls that lead to a mitm attack

A vulnerability was found in the Hot Rod client. This security issue occurs as the Hot Rod client does not enable hostname validation when using TLS, possibly resulting in a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-infinispanRed Hat, Inc.
Product-data_gridhot_rodRed Hat Data Grid 8.4.6
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21656
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 2.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 subjectAltName matching bypass in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. The default_validator.cc implementation used to implement the default certificate validation routines has a "type confusion" bug when processing subjectAltNames. This processing allows, for example, an rfc822Name or uniformResourceIndicator to be authenticated as a domain name. This confusion allows for the bypassing of nameConstraints, as processed by the underlying OpenSSL/BoringSSL implementation, exposing the possibility of impersonation of arbitrary servers. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2011-3061
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Google Chrome before 18.0.1025.142 does not properly check X.509 certificates before use of a SPDY proxy, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers or obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-chromen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13482
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2020 | 21:49
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EM-HTTP-Request 1.1.5 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library. The hostname in a TLS server certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-em-http-request_projectn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraem-http-requestn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-31 Mar, 2025 | 16:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in pyload/pyload

Improper Certificate Validation in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev44.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pyload-ng_projectpyloadpyload
Product-pyload-ngpyloadpyload/pyload
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-0601
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-94.03% / 99.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2020 | 23:11
Updated-30 Jul, 2025 | 01:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2020-01-29||Apply updates per vendor instructions.

A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates.An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted, legitimate source, aka 'Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationGo
Product-windows_10_1607windowswindows_server_1909windows_server_1903windows_10_1803windows_10_1903windows_10_1507gowindows_10_1709windows_10_1809windows_10_1909windows_server_1803windows_server_2016windows_server_2019Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows Server, version 1909 (Server Core installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindowsWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based SystemsWindows ServerWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit SystemsWindows
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1622
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.08% / 24.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 and 7.3 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-force ID: 133120.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-qradar_incident_forensicsQRadar SIEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-55581
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 9.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When AdaCore Ada Web Server 25.0.0 is linked with GnuTLS, the default behaviour of AWS.Client is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack because of lack of verification of an HTTPS server's certificate (unless the using program specifies a TLS configuration).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-adacoren/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ada_web_serverdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-7383
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Aug, 2024 | 13:19
Updated-06 Aug, 2025 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Libnbd: nbd server improper certificate validation

A flaw was found in libnbd. The client did not always correctly verify the NBD server's certificate when using TLS to connect to an NBD server. This issue allows a man-in-the-middle attack on NBD traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced VirtualizationRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-5639
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.57% / 67.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Oct, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

niconico App for iOS before 6.38 does not verify SSL certificates which could allow remote attackers to execute man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dwangon/a
Product-niconicon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-37437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.97%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-16 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ingest Actions UI in Splunk Enterprise 9.0.0 disabled TLS certificate validation

When using Ingest Actions to configure a destination that resides on Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) in Splunk Web, TLS certificate validation is not correctly performed and tested for the destination. The vulnerability only affects connections between Splunk Enterprise and an Ingest Actions Destination through Splunk Web and only applies to environments that have configured TLS certificate validation. It does not apply to Destinations configured directly in the outputs.conf configuration file. The vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise version 9.0.0 and does not affect versions below 9.0.0, including the 8.1.x and 8.2.x versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 66.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2021 | 14:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-windriverSonicWall Inc.FreeBSD FoundationFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.McAfee, LLCNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-freebsdpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsopensslnessus_agentsonicosmysql_connectorssantricity_smi-s_providerstoragegridnode.jsjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsgraalvmontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityfedorasma100_firmwarenessus_network_monitornessusweb_gatewayjd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementcloud_volumes_ontap_mediatorcapture_clientsma100linuxoncommand_workflow_automationmysql_workbenchsantricity_smi-s_provider_firmwareweblogic_serverstoragegrid_firmwaremysql_enterprise_monitorsecure_global_desktopemail_securityweb_gateway_cloud_servicesecure_backupcommerce_guided_searchmysql_serverOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Dec, 2021 | 18:04
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL Certificate Validation issue exists in Pluck 4.7.15 in update_applet.php, which could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pluck-cmsn/a
Product-pluckn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29504
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.85% / 73.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wp-cliwp-cli
Product-wp-cliwp-cli
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5824
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Trillian 5.1.0.19 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-4831.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cerulean_studiosn/a
Product-trilliann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27899
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 20:48
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Proofpoint Insider Threat Management Agents (formerly ObserveIT Agent) for MacOS and Linux perform improper validation of the ITM Server's certificate, which enables a remote attacker to intercept and alter these communications using a man-in-the-middle attack. All versions before 7.11.1 are affected. Agents for Windows and Cloud are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proofpointn/a
Product-insider_threat_managementn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-26911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2021 | 20:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-canarymaillibmailcoren/a
Product-canary_mailmailcore2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Lynx does not verify that the server's certificate is signed by a trusted certification authority, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate, related to improper use of a certain GnuTLS function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lynxn/aCanonical Ltd.
Product-lynxubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-20649
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Feb, 2021 | 06:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ELECOM WRC-300FEBK-S contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability. Via a man-in-the-middle attack, an attacker may alter the communication response. As a result, an arbitrary OS command may be executed on the affected device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Elecom Co., Ltd.
Product-wrc-300febk-s_firmwarewrc-300febk-sWRC-300FEBK-S
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-21385
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2021 | 20:45
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled hostname verification and accepting self-signed certificates

Mifos-Mobile Android Application for MifosX is an Android Application built on top of the MifosX Self-Service platform. Mifos-Mobile before commit e505f62 disables HTTPS hostname verification of its HTTP client. Additionally it accepted any self-signed certificate as valid. Hostname verification is an important part when using HTTPS to ensure that the presented certificate is valid for the host. Disabling it can allow for man-in-the-middle attacks. Accepting any certificate, even self-signed ones allows man-in-the-middle attacks. This problem is fixed in mifos-mobile commit e505f62.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mifosopenMF
Product-mifos-mobilemifos-mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2021-1277
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5909
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jul, 2020 | 12:26
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-nginx_controllerNGINX Controller
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5684
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 01:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

iSM client versions from V5.1 prior to V12.1 running on NEC Storage Manager or NEC Storage Manager Express does not verify a server certificate properly, which allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication or alter the communication via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NEC Corporation
Product-ism_serverm320fm120m12em320Management software for NEC Storage disk array system
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found