Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-3547

Summary
Assigner-OpenVPN
Assigner Org ID-36a55730-e66d-4d39-8ca6-3c3b3017965e
Published At-12 Jul, 2021 | 10:35
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected At-
Credits

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:OpenVPN
Assigner Org ID:36a55730-e66d-4d39-8ca6-3c3b3017965e
Published At:12 Jul, 2021 | 10:35
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
OpenVPN 3 Core Library
Versions
Affected
  • 3.6 and 3.6.1
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-305CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-305
Description: CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements
x_refsource_MISC
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@openvpn.net
Published At:12 Jul, 2021 | 11:15
Updated At:27 Oct, 2022 | 12:22

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.8MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.8
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

openvpn
openvpn
>>openvpn>>3.6
cpe:2.3:a:openvpn:openvpn:3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openvpn
openvpn
>>openvpn>>3.6.1
cpe:2.3:a:openvpn:openvpn:3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-305Secondarysecurity@openvpn.net
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-305
Type: Secondary
Source: security@openvpn.net
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547security@openvpn.net
Patch
Vendor Advisory
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncementssecurity@openvpn.net
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2021-3547
Source: security@openvpn.net
Resource:
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements
Source: security@openvpn.net
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

176Records found

CVE-2022-0547
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.46% / 64.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 18:00
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN 2.1 until v2.4.12 and v2.5.6 may enable authentication bypass in external authentication plug-ins when more than one of them makes use of deferred authentication replies, which allows an external user to be granted access with only partially correct credentials.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/aFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-fedoradebian_linuxopenvpnOpenVPN
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CVE-2020-15078
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 66.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Apr, 2021 | 13:19
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN 2.5.1 and earlier versions allows a remote attackers to bypass authentication and access control channel data on servers configured with deferred authentication, which can be used to potentially trigger further information leaks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/aCanonical Ltd.Fedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxfedoraopenvpnOpenVPN
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CVE-2020-15077
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.08%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 10:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN Access Server 2.8.7 and earlier versions allows a remote attackers to bypass authentication and access control channel data on servers configured with deferred authentication, which can be used to potentially trigger further information leaks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/a
Product-openvpn_access_serverOpenVPN Access Server
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2022-3761
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Oct, 2023 | 12:10
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN Connect versions before 3.4.0.4506 (macOS) and OpenVPN Connect before 3.4.0.3100 (Windows) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept configuration profile download requests which contains the users credentials

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnOpenVPN Inc
Product-connectOpenVPN Connect
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-46788
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Communications, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Communications, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2025 | 15:48
Updated-05 Aug, 2025 | 13:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Zoom Workplace for Linux - Improper Certificate Validation

Improper certificate validation in Zoom Workplace for Linux before version 6.4.13 may allow an unauthorized user to conduct an information disclosure via network access.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zoom Communications, Inc.
Product-workplace_desktopZoom Workplace for Linux
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44549
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.84%
||
7 Day CHG+0.06%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server

Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_commons_messaging_mailApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-10091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 13:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-geodeApache Geode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-49570
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 45.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 08:07
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Basic Constraints certificate in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11210)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software trusts a certificate issued by an entity that isn't authorized to issue certificates. This occurs when the "Basic Constraints" extension in the certificate indicates that it is meant to be an "End Entity”. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle Corporation
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsgraalvmmysql_enterprise_monitormysql_clustermysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-40800
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.02% / 4.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2025 | 10:44
Updated-10 Mar, 2026 | 18:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), NX V2412 (All versions < V2412.8700), NX V2506 (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 10), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 1). The IAM client in affected products is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-NX V2412NX V2506Simcenter 3DSolid Edge SE2026COMOS V10.6Simcenter FemapSolid Edge SE2025
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2021-42027
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 12:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions < V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_edgeSINUMERIK Edge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-55581
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 46.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When AdaCore Ada Web Server 25.0.0 is linked with GnuTLS, the default behaviour of AWS.Client is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack because of lack of verification of an HTTPS server's certificate (unless the using program specifies a TLS configuration).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-adacoren/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ada_web_serverdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4849
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in Siveillance VMS Video for Android (All versions < V12.1a (2018 R1)), Siveillance VMS Video for iOS (All versions < V12.1a (2018 R1)). Improper certificate validation could allow an attacker in a privileged network position to read data from and write data to the encrypted communication channel between the app and a server. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker in a privileged network position which allows intercepting the communication channel between the affected app and a server (such as Man-in-the-Middle). Furthermore, an attacker must be able to generate a certificate that results for the validation algorithm in a checksum identical to a trusted certificate. Successful exploitation requires no user interaction. The vulnerability could allow reading data from and writing data to the encrypted communication channel between the app and a server, impacting the communication's confidentiality and integrity. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known. Siemens confirms the security vulnerability and provides mitigations to resolve the security issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-siveillance_vms_videoSiveillance VMS Video for Android, Siveillance VMS Video for iOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3618
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.61% / 70.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vsftpd_projectsendmailn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectF5, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxfedoranginxvsftpdsendmailALPACA
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1566
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2021 | 17:45
Updated-07 Nov, 2024 | 22:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Web Security Appliance Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints integration of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept traffic between an affected device and the AMP servers. This vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation when an affected device establishes TLS connections. A man-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to spoof a trusted host and then extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-asyncosemail_security_applianceweb_security_applianceCisco Web Security Appliance (WSA)
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-54848
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.37% / 59.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-02 Oct, 2025 | 16:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper handling and storage of certificates in CP Plus CP-VNR-3104 B3223P22C02424 allow attackers to decrypt communications or execute a man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCP PLUS (Aditya Group - Aditya Infotech Limited)
Product-cp-vnr-3104cp-vnr-3104_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999034
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Inedo ProGet Plugin 0.8 and earlier in ProGetApi.java, ProGetConfig.java, ProGetConfiguration.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-inedo_progetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-34599
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 26.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Dec, 2021 | 09:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in CODESYS Git

Affected versions of CODESYS Git in Versions prior to V1.1.0.0 lack certificate validation in HTTPS handshakes. CODESYS Git does not implement certificate validation by default, so it does not verify that the server provides a valid and trusted HTTPS certificate. Since the certificate of the server to which the connection is made is not properly verified, the server connection is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CODESYS GmbH
Product-development_systemgitCODESYS Git
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17187
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 48.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_proton-jApache Qpid Proton-J
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-15784
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 26.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jan, 2019 | 22:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DSA-2019-001: Dell Networking OS10 Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

Dell Networking OS10 versions prior to 10.4.3.0 contain a vulnerability in the Phone Home feature which does not properly validate the server's certificate authority during TLS handshake. Use of an invalid or malicious certificate could potentially allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-networking_os10Dell Networking OS10
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 141417.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_guardiumSecurity Guardium
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-24461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.44% / 63.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2023 | 14:31
Updated-29 Jan, 2025 | 21:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS vulnerability

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.Microsoft CorporationF5, Inc.
Product-windowsbig-ip_access_policy_managermacosBIG-IP Edge Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52329
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.67% / 71.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins for specific robots do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic and obtain authentication tokens.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-homeECOVACS HOME
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12499
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jul, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Motorola MBP853 firmware does not correctly validate server certificates. This allows for a Man in The Middle (MiTM) attack to take place between a Motorola MBP853 camera and the servers it communicates with. In one such instance, it was identified that the device was downloading what appeared to be a client certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMotorola Mobility LLC. (Lenovo Group Limited)
Product-mbp853_firmwarembp853n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52330
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.66% / 71.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic, possibly modifying firmware updates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-deebot_x1s_pro_plusdeebot_x5_pro_ultradeebot_x1_turbodeebot_x1_omnideebot_x5_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_firmwaredeebot_t10_firmwaredeebot_x2_omnideebot_x1_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omnideebot_t10_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1_firmwaredeebot_x2sdeebot_x2_combodeebot_t10_plus_firmwaredeebot_x2_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1deebot_t10_plusdeebot_x1_pro_omnideebot_x2_combo_firmwaredeebot_t10_turbodeebot_x1_pro_omni_firmwaremate_xdeebot_x5_pro_ultra_firmwaredeebot_x5_pro_firmwaredeebot_x5_prodeebot_x2_pro_firmwaremate_x_firmwaredeebot_x2_prodeebot_x5_pro_plusdeebot_x2s_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omnideebot_x1_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_plusdeebot_x1s_prodeebot_t10DEEBOT X1 TURBODEEBOT T10 OMNIDEEBOT T10 TURBODEEBOT T10 PLUSDEEBOT X2 PRODEEBOT X5 PRODEEBOT X1 PRO OMNIDEEBOT X1 PLUSDEEBOT X2 OMNIMate XDEEBOT X2SDEEBOT X5 PRO ULTRADEEBOT X5 PRO PLUSDEEBOT X1S PRODEEBOT X1S PRO PLUSDEEBOT T10DEEBOT X1 OMNIDEEBOT X1DEEBOT X2 COMBODEEBOT X1e OMNI
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 66.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-50691
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SunGrow iSolarCloud Android app V2.1.6.20241104 and prior suffers from Missing SSL Certificate Validation. The app explicitly ignores certificate errors and is vulnerable to MiTM attacks. Attackers can impersonate the iSolarCloud server and communicate with the Android app.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sungrowpowern/a
Product-isolarcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-70045
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Feb, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-26 Feb, 2026 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in jxcore jxm master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in HTTPS request options when 'jx_obj.IsSecure' is true

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jxcoren/a
Product-jxmn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jun, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Burp Suite Community Edition 1.7.32 and 1.7.33 fail to validate the server certificate in a couple of HTTPS requests which allows a man in the middle to modify or view traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-portswiggerTenable, Inc.
Product-burp_suiteBurp Suite Community Edition
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Dec, 2021 | 18:04
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL Certificate Validation issue exists in Pluck 4.7.15 in update_applet.php, which could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pluck-cmsn/a
Product-pluckn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2021 | 11:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_manage_mytoolssinumerik_manage_myprogramssinumerik_integrate_clientsinumerik_analyse_myconditionsinumerik_manage_myresources_firmwaresinumerik_analyse_mycondition_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mytools_firmwaresinumerik_optimize_myprogramming_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mymachinessinumerik_optimize_myprogrammingsinumerik_analyze_myperformance_firmwaresinumerik_analyze_myperformancesinumerik_integrate_client_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_productionsinumerik_manage_myresourcessinumerik_manage_mymachines_firmwaresinumerik_operate_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_production_firmwaresinumerik_operatesinumerik_manage_myprograms_firmwareSINUMERIK Analyse MyConditionSINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-TuningSINUMERIK Operate V4.94SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel MonitorSINUMERIK Integrate Client 02SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam EditorSINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ToolsSINUMERIK Manage MyMachinesSINUMERIK Operate V4.93SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformanceSINUMERIK Operate V4.8SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-MonitorSINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /RemoteSINUMERIK Manage MyProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate Client 04SINUMERIK Manage MyTools
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 17.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000605
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins CollabNet Plugin 2.0.4 and earlier in CollabNetApp.java, CollabNetPlugin.java, CNFormFieldValidator.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-collabnetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0650
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Sep, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LINE MUSIC for Android version 3.1.0 to versions prior to 3.6.5 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-linecorpLINE MUSIC CORPORATION
Product-line_musicLINE MUSIC for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0334
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the certificate management subsystem of Cisco AnyConnect Network Access Manager and of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for iOS, Mac OS X, Android, Windows, and Linux could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the TLS certificate check when downloading certain configuration files. The vulnerability is due to improper use of Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol and improper server certificate validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by preparing malicious profile and localization files for Cisco AnyConnect to use. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to remotely change the configuration profile, a certificate, or the localization data used by AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh23141.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-anyconnect_secure_mobility_clientCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client unknown
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0611
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The ANA App for iOS version 4.0.22 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ANA (All Nippon Airways)
Product-anaANA App for iOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0553
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Apr, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The iRemoconWiFi App for Android version 4.1.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-glamoGlamo Inc.
Product-iremocon_wifiiRemoconWiFi App for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0622
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jul, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The DHC Online Shop App for Android version 3.2.0 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dhcDHC Corporation
Product-dhc_online_shopDHC Online Shop App for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-31 Mar, 2025 | 16:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in pyload/pyload

Improper Certificate Validation in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev44.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pyloadpyload-ng_projectpyload
Product-pyload-ngpyloadpyload/pyload
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-9758
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 66.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Savitech driver packages for Windows silently install a self-signed certificate into the Trusted Root Certification Authorities store, aka "Inaudible Subversion."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-savitech-icn/a
Product-savitech_drivern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.82% / 83.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-09 Jun, 2026 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-2996
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 46.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the python-scciclient when making an HTTPS connection to a server where the server's certificate would not be verified. This issue opens up the connection to possible Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-python-scciclient_projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-python-scciclientdebian_linuxpython-scciclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 28.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-palantirPalantir
Product-atlasdbAtlasDB
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-3446
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Libcloud before 0.11.1 uses an incorrect regular expression during verification of whether the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-libcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7513
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that Satellite 5 configured with SSL/TLS for the PostgreSQL backend failed to correctly validate X.509 server certificate host name fields. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a PostgreSQL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-satelliteRed Hat Satellite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-23632
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.56% / 68.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2022 | 14:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik skips the router TLS configuration when the host header is an FQDN

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikOracle Corporation
Product-traefikcommunications_unified_inventory_managementtraefik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Oct, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In F5 BIG-IP PEM 12.1.0 through 12.1.2 when downloading the Type Allocation Code (TAC) database file via HTTPS, the server's certificate is not verified. Attackers in a privileged network position may be able to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against these connections. TAC databases are used in BIG-IP PEM for Device Type and OS (DTOS) and Tethering detection. Customers not using BIG-IP PEM, not configuring downloads of TAC database files, or not using HTTP for that download are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_policy_enforcement_managerF5 BIG-IP PEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found