IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 and 11.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
A vulnerability has been identified in SENTRON 7KT PAC1260 Data Manager (All versions). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change arbitrary device settings by tricking a legitimate device administrator to click on a malicious link.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in job.cc in apt-cacher-ng 0.7.26 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
PrinterOn Enterprise 4.1.4 contains multiple Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Administration page. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes to a printer (Disable, Approve, etc).
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administration panel in Piwigo before 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users via a pwg.users.add action in a request to ws.php.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Cron job tab in EasyCorp ZenTao 12.5.3 allows attackers to update the fields of a Cron job.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in xxl-api v1.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily add users to the management module via a crafted GET request.
The Lightbox Plus Colorbox plugin through 2.7.2 for WordPress has cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via wp-admin/admin.php?page=lightboxplus, as demonstrated by resultant width XSS.
solidus_backend is the admin interface for the Solidus e-commerce framework. Versions prior to 3.1.6, 3.0.6, and 2.11.16 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability allows attackers to change the state of an order's adjustments if they hold its number, and the execution happens on a store administrator's computer. Users should upgrade to solidus_backend 3.1.6, 3.0.6, or 2.11.16 to receive a patch.
A Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cscms music portal system v4.2 allows remote attackers to change the administrator's username and password.
Westermo DR-250 Pre-5162 and DR-260 Pre-5162 routers allow CSRF.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.25.3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.
An issue in the save_users() function of Online Discussion Forum Site 1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily create or update user accounts.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in (1) addaddress.php, (2) toggleignore.php, (3) removeignore.php, and (4) removeaddress.php in Infopop UBB.Threads before 6.5.2 Beta allow remote attackers to modify settings as another user via a link or IMG tag.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ownCloud Server before 5.0.15 and 6.0.x before 6.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that reset passwords via a crafted HTTP Host header.
php/qmn_options_questions_tab.php in the quiz-master-next plugin before 4.7.9 for WordPress allows CSRF, with resultant stored XSS, via the question_name parameter because js/admin_question.js mishandles parsing inside of a SCRIPT element.
An issue was found on TRENDnet TEW-831DR 1.0 601.130.1.1356 devices. The username and password setup for the web interface does not require entering the existing password. A malicious user can change the username and password of the interface.
An issue was found on TRENDnet TEW-831DR 1.0 601.130.1.1356 devices. The web interface is vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker can change the pre-shared key of the Wi-Fi router if the interface's IP address is known.
The feature-comments plugin before 1.2.5 for WordPress has CSRF for featuring or burying a comment.
RPCMS v3.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily change the password of any account.
This vulnerability arises because the application allows the user to perform some sensitive action without verifying that the request was sent intentionally. An attacker can cause a victim's browser to emit an HTTP request to an arbitrary URL in the application.
HTTP response splitting vulnerability in index.php in phpSysInfo 2.4 and earlier, as used in phpgroupware 0.9.16 and earlier, and egroupware before 1.0.0.009, allows remote attackers to spoof web content and poison web caches via CRLF sequences in the charset parameter.
The WooCommerce Customers Manager WordPress plugin before 30.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin users delete users via CSRF attacks
The WP MultiTasking WordPress plugin through 0.1.12 does not have CSRF check when updating exit popups, which could allow attackers to make logged admins perform such action via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Mufeng's Hermit é³ä¹ęę¾åØ plugin <= 3.1.6 on WordPress via &title parameter.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in API KEY for Google Maps plugin <= 1.2.1 at WordPress leading to Google Maps API key update.
During testing of the Master Slider WordPress plugin through 3.9.10, a CSRF vulnerability was found, which allows an unauthorized user to manipulate requests on behalf of the victim and thereby delete all of the sliders inside Master Slider WordPress plugin through 3.9.10.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Image Slider by NextCode plugin <= 1.1.2 at WordPress allows deleting slides.
The CB (legacy) WordPress plugin through 0.9.4.18 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting codes, timeframes, and bookings via CSRF attacks
A vulnerability was found in automad up to 1.10.9. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /dashboard?controller=UserCollection::createUser of the component User Creation Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248687. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Multiple CSRF issues in Horde Groupware Webmail Edition 5.1.2 and earlier in basic.php.
The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin before 3.3.26 does not have CSRF checks in some of its admin pages, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as delete all products
A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.
A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Nipah Virus Testing Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file manage-phlebotomist.php. The manipulation of the argument pid leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-246640.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Private Messages For WordPress plugin <= 2.1.10 at WordPress allows attackers to send messages.
IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210.
Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send POST request that deletes given user. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.
The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (for Pro) & 2.2.7 (for Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the evo_eventpost_update_meta function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A carefully crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow the attacker to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in upgrade_step2.sh in MiCasaVerde VeraLite with firmware 1.5.408 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that install arbitrary firmware via the squashfs parameter.
An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 2.1.0. It allows XSS via CSRF.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simple Ajax Chat (WordPress plugin) <= 20220115 allows an attacker to clear the chat log or delete a chat message.
NETGEAR JNR1010 devices before 1.0.0.32 allow cgi-bin/webproc CSRF via the :InternetGatewayDevice.X_TWSZ-COM_URL_Filter.BlackList.1.URL parameter.
A vulnerability was found in jsnjfz WebStack-Guns 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed write operations on a victim-owned repository by exploiting incorrect request types. A mitigating factor is that the attacker would have to be a trusted GitHub Enterprise Server user, and the victim would have to visit a tag in the attacker's fork of their own repository. vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior 3.14 and was fixed in version 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
An issue was discovered in the MediaWikiChat extension for MediaWiki through 1.42.1. CSRF can occur in API modules.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Linksys WAG54GS Wireless-G ADSL Gateway with 1.01.03 and earlier firmware allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via an arbitrary valid request to an administrative URI, as demonstrated by (1) a Restore Factory Defaults action using the mtenRestore parameter to setup.cgi and (2) creation of a user account using the sysname parameter to setup.cgi.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Blog for EC-CUBE4 Ver.1.0.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the administrator and delete a blog article or a category via a specially crafted page.
The Interactive Contact Form and Multi Step Form Builder with Drag & Drop Editor WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF checks on some of its form actions such as deletion and duplication, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks
The EventON - WordPress Virtual Event Calendar Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 (Pro) & 2.2.8 (Free). This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_virtual_event_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify virtual event settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.