Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2022-32152

Summary
Assigner-Splunk
Assigner Org ID-42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469
Published At-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated At-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected At-
Credits

Splunk Enterprise lacked TLS cert validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communication by default

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:Splunk
Assigner Org ID:42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469
Published At:15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated At:17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Splunk Enterprise lacked TLS cert validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communication by default

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Affected Products
Vendor
Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)Splunk
Product
Splunk Enterprise
Versions
Affected
  • From 9.0 before 9.0 (custom)
Vendor
Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)Splunk
Product
Splunk Cloud Platform
Versions
Affected
  • From 8.2 before 8.2.2203 (custom)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Chris Green at Splunk
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updates
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updates
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updates
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updates
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:prodsec@splunk.com
Published At:15 Jun, 2022 | 17:15
Updated At:24 Jun, 2022 | 01:23

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.2HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Secondary3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary2.06.5MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.2
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 6.5
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CPE Matches

Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
splunk
>>splunk>>Versions before 9.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
splunk
>>splunk_cloud_platform>>Versions before 8.2.2203(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_cloud_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-295Secondaryprodsec@splunk.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidationprodsec@splunk.com
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updatesprodsec@splunk.com
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/prodsec@splunk.com
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/prodsec@splunk.com
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/prodsec@splunk.com
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/prodsec@splunk.com
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.htmlprodsec@splunk.com
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/Updates
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://research.splunk.com/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
Source: prodsec@splunk.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

99Records found

CVE-2022-32153
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:48
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise lacked TLS host name validation

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-20205
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 15.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2026 | 15:17
Updated-17 Apr, 2026 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Sensitive Information Disclosure in ''_internal'' index in Splunk MCP Server app

In Splunk MCP Server app versions below 1.0.3 , a user who holds a role with access to the Splunk `_internal` index or possesses the high-privilege capability `mcp_tool_admin` could view users session and authorization tokens in clear text.<br><br>The vulnerability would require either local access to the log files or administrative access to internal indexes, which by default only the admin role receives. <br><br>Review roles and capabilities on your instance and restrict internal index access to administrator-level roles. See [Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities](https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Rolesandcapabilities) and [Connecting to MCP Server and Admin settings](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/mcp-server-for-splunk-platform/connecting-to-mcp-server-and-admin-settings) in the Splunk documentation for more information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-Splunk MCP Server
CWE ID-CWE-532
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
CVE-2026-20163
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-8||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.63%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-11 Mar, 2026 | 16:18
Updated-24 Mar, 2026 | 17:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Remote Command Execution (RCE) through the '/splunkd/__upload/indexing/preview' REST endpoint in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.4, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.0.2503.12, 10.1.2507.16, and 9.3.2411.124, a user who holds a role that contains the high-privilege capability `edit_cmd` could execute arbitrary shell commands using the `unarchive_cmd` parameter for the `/splunkd/__upload/indexing/preview` REST endpoint.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk Cloud PlatformSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-77
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
CVE-2023-46231
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 41.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 17:00
Updated-28 Feb, 2025 | 11:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Session Token Disclosure to Internal Log Files in Splunk Add-on Builder

In Splunk Add-on Builder versions below 4.1.4, the application writes user session tokens to its internal log files when you visit the Splunk Add-on Builder or when you build or edit a custom app or add-on.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-add-on_builderSplunk Add-on Builder
CWE ID-CWE-532
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
CVE-2024-29945
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2024 | 16:16
Updated-16 Dec, 2025 | 18:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Authentication Token Exposure in Debug Log in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.1, 9.1.4, and 9.0.9, the software potentially exposes authentication tokens during the token validation process. This exposure happens when either Splunk Enterprise runs in debug mode or the JsonWebToken component has been configured to log its activity at the DEBUG logging level.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprisesplunk
CWE ID-CWE-532
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
CVE-2023-32708
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 41.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2023 | 16:34
Updated-28 Feb, 2025 | 11:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTTP Response Splitting via the ‘rest’ SPL Command

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.0.2303.100, a low-privileged user can trigger an HTTP response splitting vulnerability with the ‘rest’ SPL command that lets them potentially access other REST endpoints in the system arbitrarily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk Cloud PlatformSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-113
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
CWE ID-CWE-436
Interpretation Conflict
CVE-2021-22901
Matching Score-8
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2021 | 15:49
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURLSiemens AG
Product-communications_cloud_native_core_network_function_cloud_native_environmentcloud_backupsolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeh300s_firmwareh410scurlhci_compute_nodeh300ssnapcenterh300e_firmwaresinec_infrastructure_network_servicesessbaseh500eh500s_firmwareh500e_firmwarecommunications_cloud_native_core_binding_support_functionh700ehci_compute_node_firmwareoncommand_insightcommunications_cloud_native_core_service_communication_proxyh300ecommunications_cloud_native_core_network_slice_selection_functionh500scommunications_cloud_native_core_network_repository_functionactive_iq_unified_manageroncommand_workflow_automationuniversal_forwarderh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeh700e_firmwaresolidfire_baseboard_management_controller_firmwareh700smysql_serverhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-416
Use After Free
CVE-2021-26253
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2022 | 16:34
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Bypass of Splunk Enterprise's implementation of DUO MFA

A potential vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise's implementation of DUO MFA allows for bypassing the MFA verification in Splunk Enterprise versions before 8.1.6. The potential vulnerability impacts Splunk Enterprise instances configured to use DUO MFA and does not impact or affect a DUO product or service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2022-42915
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 64.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-07 May, 2025 | 14:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

curl before 7.86.0 has a double free. If curl is told to use an HTTP proxy for a transfer with a non-HTTP(S) URL, it sets up the connection to the remote server by issuing a CONNECT request to the proxy, and then tunnels the rest of the protocol through. An HTTP proxy might refuse this request (HTTP proxies often only allow outgoing connections to specific port numbers, like 443 for HTTPS) and instead return a non-200 status code to the client. Due to flaws in the error/cleanup handling, this could trigger a double free in curl if one of the following schemes were used in the URL for the transfer: dict, gopher, gophers, ldap, ldaps, rtmp, rtmps, or telnet. The earliest affected version is 7.77.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCURLFedora ProjectNetApp, Inc.Apple Inc.Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-h410suniversal_forwarderh500s_firmwaremacosfedorah500scurlh700s_firmwareh410s_firmwareh300sh300s_firmwareontap_9h700sn/a
CWE ID-CWE-415
Double Free
CVE-2017-7565
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-2.59% / 85.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Splunk Hadoop Connect App has a path traversal vulnerability that allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code, aka ERP-2041.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-hadoop_connectn/a
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-37437
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ingest Actions UI in Splunk Enterprise 9.0.0 disabled TLS certificate validation

When using Ingest Actions to configure a destination that resides on Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) in Splunk Web, TLS certificate validation is not correctly performed and tested for the destination. The vulnerability only affects connections between Splunk Enterprise and an Ingest Actions Destination through Splunk Web and only applies to environments that have configured TLS certificate validation. It does not apply to Destinations configured directly in the outputs.conf configuration file. The vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise version 9.0.0 and does not affect versions below 9.0.0, including the 8.1.x and 8.2.x versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5729
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Mar, 2019 | 17:34
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Splunk-SDK-Python before 1.6.6 does not properly verify untrusted TLS server certificates, which could result in man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22943
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 55.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Feb, 2023 | 17:22
Updated-28 Feb, 2025 | 11:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Modular Input REST API Requests Connect via HTTP after Certificate Validation Failure in Splunk Add-on Builder and Splunk CloudConnect SDK

In Splunk Add-on Builder (AoB) versions below 4.1.2 and the Splunk CloudConnect SDK versions below 3.1.3, requests to third-party APIs through the REST API Modular Input incorrectly revert to using HTTP to connect after a failure to connect over HTTPS occurs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-add-on_buildercloudconnect_software_development_kitSplunk Add-on BuilderSplunk CloudConnect SDK
CWE ID-CWE-636
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22926
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 71.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURLSiemens AG
Product-h300epeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsh500sh300s_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerh410soncommand_workflow_automationcurlh300suniversal_forwardersolidfiresnapcentersinec_infrastructure_network_servicesh300e_firmwareclustered_data_ontaph500ehci_management_nodeh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwareh500s_firmwareh500e_firmwareh700eh700e_firmwaremysql_serverh700soncommand_insighthttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-840
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-8286
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2020 | 19:39
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle CorporationSiemens AGSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)Apple Inc.CURLFedora Project
Product-libcurlpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolscommunications_billing_and_revenue_managementhci_storage_nodehci_storage_node_firmwarehci_bootstrap_osmacosuniversal_forwarderhci_compute_nodecommunications_cloud_native_core_policysolidfiresinec_infrastructure_network_servicesclustered_data_ontapsimatic_tim_1531_irc_firmwaredebian_linuxessbasehci_management_nodefedoramac_os_xsimatic_tim_1531_irchttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27782
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 64.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURL
Product-debian_linuxuniversal_forwardercurlhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-41243
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Sep, 2022 | 15:46
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins SmallTest Plugin 1.0.4 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured View26 server that could be abused using a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept these connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-smalltestJenkins SmallTest Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-4396
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Devolutions Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Devolutions Inc.
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 13.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2026 | 19:41
Updated-30 Mar, 2026 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Devolutions Hub Reporting Service 2025.3.1.1 and earlier allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via disabled TLS certificate verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Devolutions
Product-hub_reporting_serviceHub Reporting Service
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-4434
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Devolutions Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Devolutions Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 8.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Mar, 2026 | 12:52
Updated-30 Mar, 2026 | 15:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in the PAM propagation WinRM connections allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via disabled TLS certificate verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Devolutions
Product-devolutions_serverServer
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-36881
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.91% / 75.95%
||
7 Day CHG+0.17%
Published-27 Jul, 2022 | 14:20
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 10:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins Git client Plugin 3.11.0 and earlier does not perform SSH host key verification when connecting to Git repositories via SSH, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-git_clientJenkins Git client Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-15612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 16.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 18:16
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 15:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Wazuh Provisioning Scripts / Build Infrastructure Improper Certificate Validation leading to MITM and RCE

Wazuh provisioning scripts and Dockerfiles contain an insecure transport vulnerability where curl is invoked with the -k/--insecure flag, disabling SSL/TLS certificate validation. Attackers with network access can perform man-in-the-middle attacks to intercept and modify downloaded dependencies or code during the build process, leading to remote code execution and supply chain compromise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Wazuh, Inc.
Product-wazuhWazuh Provisioning Scripts (Agent Build Environment)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-829
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
CVE-2026-27134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 5.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2026 | 23:05
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 21:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Strimzi: All CAs from a custom CA chain consisting of multiple CAs are trusted for mTLS user autentication

Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. In versions 0.49.0 through 0.50.0, when using a custom Cluster or Clients CA with a multistage CA chain consisting of multiple CAs, Strimzi incorrectly configures the trusted certificates for mTLS authentication on the internal as well as user-configured listeners. All CAs from the CA chain will be trusted. And users with certificates signed by any of the CAs in the chain will be able to authenticate. This issue affects only users using a custom Cluster or Clients CA with a multistage CA chain consisting of multiple CAs. It does not affect users using the Strimzi-managed Cluster and Clients CAs. It also does not affect users using custom Cluster or Clients CA with only a single CA (i.e., no CA chain with multiple CAs). This issue has been fixed in version 0.50.1. To workaround this issue, instead of providing the full CA chain as the custom CA, users can provide only the single CA that should be used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-strimziThe Linux Foundation
Product-strimzi_kafka_operatorstrimzi-kafka-operator
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CVE-2020-5367
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jun, 2020 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax versions prior to 9.1.0.17, Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance versions prior to 9.1.0.17, and PowerMax OS Release 5978 contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim's data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_unisphere_for_powermaxpowermax_osemc_unisphere_for_powermax_virtual_applianceUnisphere for PowerMax, Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance, PowerMax OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22549
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 59.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2022 | 17:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale OneFS, 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains a Improper Certificate Validation. A unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a man-in-the-middle capture of administrative credentials.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_powerscale_onefsPowerScale OneFS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-7570
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-1.83% / 83.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2024 | 18:12
Updated-06 Sep, 2024 | 21:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Ivanti ITSM on-prem and Neurons for ITSM Versions 2023.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker in a MITM position to craft a token that would allow access to ITSM as any user.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-neurons_for_itsmITSMneurons_for_itsm
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-8007
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Aug, 2024 | 13:40
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 20:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Openstack-tripleo-common: rhosp director disables tls verification for registry mirrors

A flaw was found in the openstack-tripleo-common component of the Red Hat OpenStack Platform (RHOSP) director. This vulnerability allows an attacker to deploy potentially compromised container images via disabling TLS certificate verification for registry mirrors, which could enable a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-openstack_platformRed Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 8Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7322
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 66.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2017 | 07:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The (1) update and (2) package-installation features in MODX Revolution 2.5.4-pl and earlier do not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and trigger the execution of arbitrary code via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-modxn/a
Product-modx_revolutionn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-6001
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 38.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Dec, 2024 | 17:04
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in LADM that could allow a network attacker with the ability to redirect an update request to a remote server and execute code with elevated privileges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Lenovo Group Limited
Product-Accessories and Display Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2667
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hammer CLI, a CLI utility for Foreman, before version 0.10.0, did not explicitly set the verify_ssl flag for apipie-bindings that disable it by default. As a result the server certificates are not checked and connections are prone to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Foreman
Product-hammer_clisatellitesatellite_capsuleHammer CLI
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-1805
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HP Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HP Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.41% / 61.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jul, 2022 | 14:21
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When connecting to Amazon Workspaces, the SHA256 presented by AWS connection provisioner is not fully verified by Zero Clients. The issue could be exploited by an adversary that places a MITM (Man in the Middle) between a zero client and AWS session provisioner in the network. This issue is only applicable when connecting to an Amazon Workspace from a PCoIP Zero Client.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-teradicin/a
Product-tera2_pcoip_zero_clienttera2_pcoip_zero_client_firmwareTera2 Zero Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36659
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 53.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Apache::Session::Browseable before 1.3.6, validity of the X.509 certificate is not checked by default when connecting to remote LDAP backends, because the default configuration of the Net::LDAPS module for Perl is used. NOTE: this can, for example, be fixed in conjunction with the CVE-2020-16093 fix.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lemonldap-ngn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-apache\debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36658
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 38.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-28 Mar, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Apache::Session::LDAP before 0.5, validity of the X.509 certificate is not checked by default when connecting to remote LDAP backends, because the default configuration of the Net::LDAPS module for Perl is used. NOTE: this can, for example, be fixed in conjunction with the CVE-2020-16093 fix.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lemonldap-ngn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-apache\debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-51774
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-3.94% / 88.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-06 Nov, 2024 | 17:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

qBittorrent before 5.0.1 proceeds with use of https URLs even after certificate validation errors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qbittorrentn/aqbittorrent
Product-qbittorrentn/aqbittorrent
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-40831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-126858f1-1b65-4b74-81ca-7034f7f7723f
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-126858f1-1b65-4b74-81ca-7034f7f7723f
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 51.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Nov, 2021 | 23:41
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing SNI validation and inconsistent CA override function behavior within AWS IoT Device SDKs on Apple devices

The AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java, Python, C++ and Node.js appends a user supplied Certificate Authority (CA) to the root CAs instead of overriding it on macOS systems. Additionally, SNI validation is also not enabled when the CA has been “overridden”. TLS handshakes will thus succeed if the peer can be verified either from the user-supplied CA or the system’s default trust-store. Attackers with access to a host’s trust stores or are able to compromise a certificate authority already in the host's trust store (note: the attacker must also be able to spoof DNS in this case) may be able to use this issue to bypass CA pinning. An attacker could then spoof the MQTT broker, and either drop traffic and/or respond with the attacker's data, but they would not be able to forward this data on to the MQTT broker because the attacker would still need the user's private keys to authenticate against the MQTT broker. The 'aws_tls_ctx_options_override_default_trust_store_*' function within the aws-c-io submodule has been updated to address this behavior. This issue affects: Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java versions prior to 1.5.0 on macOS. Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Python versions prior to 1.7.0 on macOS. Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for C++ versions prior to 1.14.0 on macOS. Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Node.js versions prior to 1.6.0 on macOS. Amazon Web Services AWS-C-IO 0.10.7 on macOS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonAmazon Web ServicesApple Inc.
Product-amazon_web_services_internet_of_things_device_software_development_kit_v2amazon_web_services_aws-c-iomacosAWS IoT Device SDK v2 for PythonAWS IoT Device SDK v2 for C++AWS-C-IOAWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Node.js
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-11364
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 56.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Aug, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The CMS installer in Joomla! before 3.7.4 does not verify a user's ownership of a webspace, which allows remote authenticated users to gain control of the target application by leveraging Certificate Transparency logs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJoomla!
Product-joomla\!n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000256
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 75.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Oct, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libvirt version 2.3.0 and later is vulnerable to a bad default configuration of "verify-peer=no" passed to QEMU by libvirt resulting in a failure to validate SSL/TLS certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibvirtn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-23776
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2026 | 08:56
Updated-20 Apr, 2026 | 18:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) of Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.5, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.20, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.60, contain(s) an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in certificate-based login. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-powerprotect_dp_series_appliancedata_domain_operating_systemPowerProtect Data Domain
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2023 | 16:07
Updated-23 Oct, 2024 | 14:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, 6.4.8 through 6.4.10 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and the remote FortiGuard server hosting outbreakalert ressources.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortianalyzerfortimanagerFortiManagerFortiAnalyzer
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-9952
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.90%
||
7 Day CHG-0.43%
Published-12 Mar, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The verify_certificate function in lib/vtls/schannel.c in libcurl 7.30.0 through 7.51.0, when built for Windows CE using the schannel TLS backend, makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks via a crafted wildcard SAN in a server certificate, as demonstrated by "*.com."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicrosoft CorporationCURL
Product-curlwindows_embedded_compactn/acurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-48427
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 22.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Dec, 2023 | 11:27
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 2). Affected products do not properly validate the certificate of the configured UMC server. This could allow an attacker to intercept credentials that are sent to the UMC server as well as to manipulate responses, potentially allowing an attacker to escalate privileges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinec_insSINEC INS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3935
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fedora Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fedora Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 22.62%
||
7 Day CHG-0.06%
Published-22 Nov, 2021 | 15:59
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When PgBouncer is configured to use "cert" authentication, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject arbitrary SQL queries when a connection is first established, despite the use of TLS certificate verification and encryption. This flaw affects PgBouncer versions prior to 1.16.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pgbouncern/aFedora ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.
Product-fedoradebian_linuxpgbouncerenterprise_linuxpgbouncer
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CVE-2020-15813
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2020 | 18:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Graylog before 3.3.3 lacks SSL Certificate Validation for LDAP servers. It allows use of an external user/group database stored in LDAP. The connection configuration allows the usage of unencrypted, SSL- or TLS-secured connections. Unfortunately, the Graylog client code (in all versions that support LDAP) does not implement proper certificate validation (regardless of whether the "Allow self-signed certificates" option is used). Therefore, any attacker with the ability to intercept network traffic between a Graylog server and an LDAP server is able to redirect traffic to a different LDAP server (unnoticed by the Graylog server due to the lack of certificate validation), effectively bypassing Graylog's authentication mechanism.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-graylogn/a
Product-graylogn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-21228
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 25.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Feb, 2026 | 17:51
Updated-10 Apr, 2026 | 13:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Azure Local Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Improper certificate validation in Azure Local allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-Azure Local
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-43017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 10.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Feb, 2024 | 16:10
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 22:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Security Verify Access man in the middle

IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.6.1 could allow a privileged user to install a configuration file that could allow remote access. IBM X-Force ID: 266155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_verify_accessSecurity Verify Access ApplianceSecurity Verify Access Docker
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-32627
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 9.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Mar, 2026 | 20:48
Updated-17 Mar, 2026 | 19:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
cpp-httplib has a Silent TLS Certificate Verification Bypass on HTTPS Redirect via Proxy

cpp-httplib is a C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library. Prior to 0.37.2, when a cpp-httplib client is configured with a proxy and set_follow_location(true), any HTTPS redirect it follows will have TLS certificate and hostname verification silently disabled on the new connection. The client will accept any certificate presented by the redirect target — expired, self-signed, or forged — without raising an error or notifying the application. A network attacker in a position to return a redirect response can fully intercept the follow-up HTTPS connection, including any credentials or session tokens in flight. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.37.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yhiroseyhirose
Product-cpp-httplibcpp-httplib
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-42193
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
CVSS Score-2.1||LOW
EPSS-0.14% / 33.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2025 | 18:16
Updated-09 Oct, 2025 | 19:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HCL BigFix Web Reports is susceptible to a Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) attack

HCL BigFix Web Reports' service communicates over HTTPS but exhibits a weakness in its handling of SSL certificate validation. This scenario presents a possibility of man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and data exposure as, if exploited, this vulnerability could potentially lead to unauthorized access.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HCL Technologies Ltd.
Product-bigfix_platformHCL BigFix Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-9293
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TP-Link Systems Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TP-Link Systems Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 2.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2026 | 00:22
Updated-01 Apr, 2026 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insufficient Certificate Validation in Multiple Mobile Applications Allows Man in the Middle Interception

A vulnerability in the certificate validation logic may allow applications to accept untrusted or improperly validated server identities during TLS communication. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to intercept or modify traffic if they can position themselves within the communication channel. Successful exploitation may compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of application data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TP Link Systems Inc.TP-Link Systems Inc.TP-Link Systems Inc.
Product-wi-fi_navikidshieldfestaaginetkasatapotethervigiomadaomada_guardtpcamerawifi_toolkittp-partnerdecoTapo AppWiFi ToolkitTether AppFesta AppWi-Fi NaviOmada GuardKasa AppDeco AppKidShieldTP-Partner AppVIGI ApptpCamera AppAginet AppOmada App
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38351
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-5.97% / 90.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 17:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MiniTool Partition Wizard 12.8 contains an insecure installation mechanism that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-minitooln/a
Product-partition_wizardn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found