Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-7734

Summary
Assigner-CERTVDE
Assigner Org ID-270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c
Published At-10 Sep, 2024 | 08:03
Updated At-10 Sep, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected At-
Credits

Phoenix Contact: Multiple mGuard devices are vulnerable to a drain of open file descriptors.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:CERTVDE
Assigner Org ID:270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c
Published At:10 Sep, 2024 | 08:03
Updated At:10 Sep, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Phoenix Contact: Multiple mGuard devices are vulnerable to a drain of open file descriptors.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

Affected Products
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 2102
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 2105
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4102 PCI
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4102 PCIE
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4302
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4305
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CORE TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CORE TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD GT/GT
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD GT/GT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCI4000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCI4000 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCIE4000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-B
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-M
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-P
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD SMART2
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD SMART2 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 3G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G ATT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G VZW VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 3G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G ATT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VZW VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-770CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-770
Description: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
N/A
Hyperlink: https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
Resource: N/A
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_core_tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
fl_mguard_4305_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_2102_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_2105_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4102_pcie_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4102_pci_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4302_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4305_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:info@cert.vde.com
Published At:10 Sep, 2024 | 08:15
Updated At:28 Sep, 2024 | 23:56

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CPE Matches

Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-770Primaryinfo@cert.vde.com
CWE ID: CWE-770
Type: Primary
Source: info@cert.vde.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052info@cert.vde.com
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
Source: info@cert.vde.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

103Records found

CVE-2021-21003
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2021 | 18:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Phoenix Contact FL SWITCH SMCS series products

In Phoenix Contact FL SWITCH SMCS series products in multiple versions fragmented TCP-Packets may cause a Denial of Service of Web-, SNMP- and ICMP-Echo services. The switching functionality of the device is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_switch_smcs_16txfl_switch_smn_8tx-pnfl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_sm_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8tx-mfl_switch_smcs_4tx-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_6tx\/2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_8gt_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_8tx-pnfl_switch_smcs_6gt\/2sfpfl_switch_smcs_8tx-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_8tx-pn_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8tx-m_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fxfl_switch_smcs_8tx_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2pof-pnfl_switch_smcs_4tx-pnfl_switch_smn_6tx\/2pof-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fxfl_nat_smn_8tx_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8txfl_switch_smcs_8txfl_switch_smcs_8gtfl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx-sm_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx-smfl_switch_smcs_6tx\/2sfpfl_switch_smcs_16tx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_6gt\/2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_smFL NATFL SWITCH
CWE ID-CWE-404
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
CVE-2023-2673
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 4.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jun, 2023 | 06:16
Updated-03 Jan, 2025 | 01:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHOENIX CONTACT: FL/TC MGUARD prone to Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT FL/TC MGUARD Family in multiple versions may allow UDP packets to bypass the filter rules and access the solely connected device behind the MGUARD which can be used for flooding attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_mguard_core_tx_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpnfl_mguard_2102_firmwarefl_mguard_2102fl_mguard_4102_pci_firmwarefl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_4302_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmwarefl_mguard_4102_pcie_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-mfl_mguard_core_tx_vpnfl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/txfl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000fl_mguard_smart2_firmwarefl_mguard_centerportfl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_4302fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-bfl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_4102_pcifl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gtfl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpnfl_mguard_4102_pciefl_mguard_core_txfl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtxfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-pfl_mguard_pci4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000_vpnFL MGUARD 4102 PCIEFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-BFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD 2102FL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPNFL MGUARD 4102 PCIFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTXFL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPNFL MGUARD CENTERPORTFL MGUARD PCI4000 VPNFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TXFL MGUARD PCIE4000FL MGUARD GT/GTFL MGUARD SMART2 VPNFL MGUARD CORE TX VPNFL MGUARD CORE TXFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-MFL MGUARD 4302FL MGUARD SMART2FL MGUARD GT/GT VPNFL MGUARD PCI4000FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-P
CWE ID-CWE-1287
Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input
CVE-2017-10053
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.28% / 79.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u151, 7u141 and 8u131; Java SE Embedded: 8u131; JRockit: R28.3.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-enterprise_linux_desktoponcommand_unified_manageroncommand_balanceplug-in_for_symantec_netbackupenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_eusenterprise_linux_workstationjdkactive_iq_unified_managersatellitevasa_providersteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagedebian_linuxenterprise_linux_servercloud_backupenterprise_linux_server_ausoncommand_insightfl_mguard_dmoncommand_performance_managerjreelement_softwaresnapmanagervirtual_storage_consoleoncommand_shifte-series_santricity_storage_managerstorage_replication_adapter_for_clustered_data_ontapjrockite-series_santricity_os_controllerJava
CVE-2017-10108
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.70% / 71.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Serialization). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u151, 7u141 and 8u131; Java SE Embedded: 8u131; JRockit: R28.3.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-enterprise_linux_desktoponcommand_unified_manageroncommand_balanceplug-in_for_symantec_netbackupenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_eusenterprise_linux_workstationjdkactive_iq_unified_managersatellitesteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagedebian_linuxenterprise_linux_servercloud_backupenterprise_linux_server_ausoncommand_insightvasa_provider_for_clustered_data_ontapfl_mguard_dmoncommand_performance_managerjreelement_softwaresnapmanagervirtual_storage_consoleoncommand_shifte-series_santricity_storage_managerstorage_replication_adapter_for_clustered_data_ontapjrockite-series_santricity_os_controllerJava
CVE-2025-24002
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.40%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2025 | 06:58
Updated-11 Jul, 2025 | 14:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MQTT DoS Vulnerability in German EV Charging Stations

An unauthenticated remote attacker can use MQTT messages to crash a service on charging stations complying with German Calibration Law, resulting in a temporary denial-of-service for these stations until they got restarted by the watchdog.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-charx_sec-3100charx_sec-3150charx_sec-3050_firmwarecharx_sec-3050charx_sec-3100_firmwarecharx_sec-3150_firmwarecharx_sec-3000_firmwarecharx_sec-3000CHARX SEC-3050CHARX SEC-3150CHARX SEC-3100CHARX SEC-3000
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2018-25112
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.40%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-04 Jun, 2025 | 09:37
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 14:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHOENIX CONTACT: ILC 1x1 ETH Denial of Service

An unauthenticated remote attacker may use an uncontrolled resource consumption in the IEC 61131 program of the affected products by creating large amounts of network traffic that needs to be handled by the ILC. This results in a Denial-of-Service of the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-ILC 131ILC 191 ETHILC 171ILC 151
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-3480
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 77.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 10:58
Updated-29 Apr, 2025 | 20:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial-of-Service vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT mGuard product family

A remote, unauthenticated attacker could cause a denial-of-service of PHOENIX CONTACT FL MGUARD and TC MGUARD devices below version 8.9.0 by sending a larger number of unauthenticated HTTPS connections originating from different source IP’s. Configuring firewall limits for incoming connections cannot prevent the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_mguard_core_tx_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/txfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-mfl_mguard_core_tx_vpnfl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/txfl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000fl_mguard_smart2_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_centerportfl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-bfl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpnfl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpnfl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gtfl_mguard_core_txfl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtxtc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-pfl_mguard_pci4000_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000_vpnTC MGUARD RS2000 4G VZW VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-PTC MGUARD RS4000 4G ATT VPNFL MGUARD CORE TX VPNTC MGUARD RS2000 3G VPNTC MGUARD RS4000 3G VPNTC MGUARD RS2000 4G VPNFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-BFL MGUARD PCI4000FL MGUARD GT/GTFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TXFL MGUARD CENTERPORTFL MGUARD SMART2 VPNFL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-MFL MGUARD GT/GT VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPNFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TXFL MGUARD SMART2FL MGUARD CORE TXFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTXTC MGUARD RS2000 4G ATT VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VZW VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPNTC MGUARD RS4000 4G VPNFL MGUARD PCI4000 VPN
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2019-10953
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 67.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2019 | 14:02
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ABB, Phoenix Contact, Schneider Electric, Siemens, WAGO - Programmable Logic Controllers, multiple versions. Researchers have found some controllers are susceptible to a denial-of-service attack due to a flood of network packets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wagon/aABBPhoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGSiemens AG
Product-ethernet_firmwarebacnet\/ip6es7211-1ae40-0xb0modicon_m221_firmwareknx_ip_firmwareknx_ipethernet6es7314-6eh04-0ab0modicon_m221pm554-tp-eth_firmware6es7314-6eh04-0ab0_firmware6ed1052-1cc01-0ba8pm554-tp-eth6es7211-1ae40-0xb0_firmwarepfc100_firmwarepfc100ilc_151_eth_firmwarebacnet\/ip_firmware6ed1052-1cc01-0ba8_firmwareilc_151_ethABB, Phoenix Contact, Schneider Electric, Siemens, WAGO - Programmable Logic Controllers
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-33541
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2021 | 18:26
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Phoenix Contact: ILC1x Industrial controllers affected by Denial-of-Service vulnerability

Phoenix Contact Classic Line Controllers ILC1x0 and ILC1x1 in all versions/variants are affected by a Denial-of-Service vulnerability. The communication protocols and device access do not feature authentication measures. Remote attackers can use specially crafted IP packets to cause a denial of service on the PLC's network communication module. A successful attack stops all network communication. To restore the network connectivity the device needs to be restarted. The automation task is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-ilc1x0_firmwareilc1x1_firmwareilc1x0ilc1x1ILC1x
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-41694
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2025 | 08:12
Updated-19 Dec, 2025 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authenticated Denial-of-Service via Webshell

A low privileged remote attacker can run the webshell with an empty command containing whitespace. The server will then block until it receives more data, resulting in a DoS condition of the websserver.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_switch_2206c-2fxfl_switch_2206-2fx_stfl_switch_2206-2fx_smfl_switch_2406-2sfxfl_switch_2512-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fx_smfl_switch_2608_pnfl_switch_2105_firmwarefl_switch_2316\/k1fl_nat_2208_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfxfl_switch_2506-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2412-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2306-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fxfl_switch_2708fl_switch_2304-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2508_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2005fl_switch_2512-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2516_pn_firmwarefl_nat_2008fl_switch_2312-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_nat_2304-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2608_firmwarefl_switch_2108_firmwarefl_switch_2316_pnfl_switch_2708_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2008_firmwarefl_switch_2516fl_switch_2304-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2207-fx_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2sfxfl_switch_2514-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2416_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2216_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2408_pnfl_switch_2214-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_st_firmwarefl_switch_2204-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2108fl_switch_2116_firmwarefl_switch_2212-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2208fl_nat_2208fl_switch_2205_firmwarefl_switch_2708_firmwarefl_switch_2504-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2406-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fxfl_switch_2208_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2016fl_switch_2206-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_st_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2214-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2008f_firmwarefl_switch_2316_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2508\/k1fl_switch_2008fl_switch_2205fl_switch_2306-2sfpfl_switch_2416fl_switch_2314-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2316fl_switch_2504-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2308_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2105fl_switch_2214-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2207-fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2408fl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2306-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2506-2sfpfl_switch_2216fl_switch_2206-2sfxfl_switch_2406-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2408_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2308fl_nat_2008_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp\/k1fl_switch_2212-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2214-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2216_pnfl_switch_2016_firmwarefl_switch_2008ffl_switch_2416_firmwarefl_switch_2514-2sfpfl_switch_2608fl_switch_2312-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_stfl_switch_2514-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2207-fxfl_nat_2304-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2208_pnfl_switch_2514-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2416_pnfl_switch_2508_pnfl_switch_2314-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206c-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2608_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2404-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2005_firmwarefl_switch_2508fl_switch_2406-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2314-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2314-2sfpfl_switch_2116fl_switch_2216_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2204-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2308_pnfl_switch_2508\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2316\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2404-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2412-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2306-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2208_firmwarefl_switch_2208c_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2508_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2516_pnfl_switch_2516_firmwarefl_switch_2308_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2208cfl_switch_2316_firmwarefl_switch_2708_pnfl_switch_2303-8sp1fl_switch_2207-fx_smfl_switch_2408_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp_pn_firmwareFL SWITCH 2212-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2205FL SWITCH 2304-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2008FFL SWITCH 2516FL SWITCH 2214-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2214-2SFXFL SWITCH 2306-2SFPFL SWITCH 2506-2SFPFL SWITCH 2312-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2316/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2SFXFL SWITCH 2206-2FX SM STFL SWITCH 2416 PNFL SWITCH 2506-2SFP/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2FXFL SWITCH 2414-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2416FL SWITCH 2206C-2FXFL SWITCH 2512-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2208 PNFL SWITCH 2316FL SWITCH 2208CFL SWITCH 2414-2SFXFL SWITCH 2216 PNFL SWITCH 2506-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2216FL SWITCH 2308 PNFL SWITCH 2005FL SWITCH 2316 PNFL SWITCH 2208FL SWITCH 2308FL SWITCH 2608FL SWITCH 2508/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2FX STFL SWITCH 2206-2FX SMFL SWITCH 2508FL NAT 2008FL SWITCH 2314-2SFPFL SWITCH 2408 PNFL SWITCH 2408FL SWITCH 2406-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2516 PNFL SWITCH 2108FL SWITCH 2508 PNFL SWITCH 2504-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2214-2FXFL SWITCH 2406-2SFXFL SWITCH 2008FL SWITCH 2116FL SWITCH 2207-FX SMFL SWITCH 2016FL SWITCH 2207-FXFL SWITCH 2514-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2514-2SFPFL SWITCH 2206-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2404-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2708 PNFL SWITCH 2412-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2306-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2708FL NAT 2208FL SWITCH 2105FL SWITCH 2303-8SP1FL SWITCH 2314-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2214-2FX SMFL NAT 2304-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2608 PNFL SWITCH 2204-2TC-2SFX
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-41693
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 49.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2025 | 08:13
Updated-19 Dec, 2025 | 18:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authenticated Denial-of-Service via SSH

A low privileged remote attacker can use the ssh feature to execute commands directly after login. The process stays open and uses resources which leads to a reduced performance of the management functions. Switching functionality is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_switch_2206c-2fxfl_switch_2206-2fx_stfl_switch_2206-2fx_smfl_switch_2406-2sfxfl_switch_2512-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fx_smfl_switch_2608_pnfl_switch_2105_firmwarefl_switch_2306-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2316\/k1fl_switch_2414-2sfxfl_switch_2506-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2412-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_nat_2208_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fxfl_switch_2708fl_switch_2304-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2508_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2005fl_switch_2512-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2516_pn_firmwarefl_nat_2008fl_switch_2312-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_nat_2304-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2608_firmwarefl_switch_2108_firmwarefl_switch_2316_pnfl_switch_2708_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2008_firmwarefl_switch_2516fl_switch_2304-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2207-fx_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2sfxfl_switch_2514-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2416_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2216_firmwarefl_switch_2408_pnfl_switch_2506-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2214-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_st_firmwarefl_switch_2204-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2108fl_switch_2116_firmwarefl_switch_2212-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2208fl_nat_2208fl_switch_2205_firmwarefl_switch_2708_firmwarefl_switch_2504-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2406-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fxfl_switch_2208_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2016fl_switch_2206-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_st_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2214-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2008f_firmwarefl_switch_2316_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2508\/k1fl_switch_2008fl_switch_2205fl_switch_2306-2sfpfl_switch_2416fl_switch_2314-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2316fl_switch_2504-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2308_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2105fl_switch_2214-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2207-fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2408fl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2306-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2506-2sfpfl_switch_2216fl_switch_2206-2sfxfl_switch_2406-2sfx_pnfl_switch_2408_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2308fl_switch_2506-2sfp\/k1fl_nat_2008_firmwarefl_switch_2212-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2214-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2216_pnfl_switch_2016_firmwarefl_switch_2008ffl_switch_2416_firmwarefl_switch_2514-2sfpfl_switch_2608fl_switch_2312-2gc-2sfpfl_switch_2206-2fx_sm_stfl_switch_2514-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2207-fxfl_switch_2208_pnfl_nat_2304-2gc-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2514-2sfp_pnfl_switch_2416_pnfl_switch_2508_pnfl_switch_2314-2sfp_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2206c-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2206-2fx_firmwarefl_switch_2608_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2404-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2508fl_switch_2406-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2314-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2005_firmwarefl_switch_2314-2sfpfl_switch_2116fl_switch_2216_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2204-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2308_pnfl_switch_2508\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2316\/k1_firmwarefl_switch_2404-2tc-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2412-2tc-2sfxfl_switch_2306-2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_2208_firmwarefl_switch_2208c_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2214-2fx_sm_firmwarefl_switch_2508_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2516_pnfl_switch_2516_firmwarefl_switch_2308_pn_firmwarefl_switch_2316_firmwarefl_switch_2208cfl_switch_2708_pnfl_switch_2303-8sp1fl_switch_2207-fx_smfl_switch_2408_firmwarefl_switch_2414-2sfx_firmwarefl_switch_2506-2sfp_pn_firmwareFL SWITCH 2212-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2205FL SWITCH 2304-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2008FFL SWITCH 2516FL SWITCH 2214-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2214-2SFXFL SWITCH 2306-2SFPFL SWITCH 2506-2SFPFL SWITCH 2312-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2316/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2SFXFL SWITCH 2206-2FX SM STFL SWITCH 2416 PNFL SWITCH 2506-2SFP/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2FXFL SWITCH 2414-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2416FL SWITCH 2206C-2FXFL SWITCH 2512-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2208 PNFL SWITCH 2316FL SWITCH 2208CFL SWITCH 2414-2SFXFL SWITCH 2216 PNFL SWITCH 2506-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2216FL SWITCH 2308 PNFL SWITCH 2005FL SWITCH 2316 PNFL SWITCH 2208FL SWITCH 2308FL SWITCH 2608FL SWITCH 2508/K1FL SWITCH 2206-2FX STFL SWITCH 2206-2FX SMFL SWITCH 2508FL NAT 2008FL SWITCH 2314-2SFPFL SWITCH 2408 PNFL SWITCH 2408FL SWITCH 2406-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2516 PNFL SWITCH 2108FL SWITCH 2508 PNFL SWITCH 2504-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2214-2FXFL SWITCH 2406-2SFXFL SWITCH 2008FL SWITCH 2116FL SWITCH 2207-FX SMFL SWITCH 2016FL SWITCH 2207-FXFL SWITCH 2514-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2514-2SFPFL SWITCH 2206-2SFX PNFL SWITCH 2404-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2708 PNFL SWITCH 2412-2TC-2SFXFL SWITCH 2306-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2708FL NAT 2208FL SWITCH 2105FL SWITCH 2303-8SP1FL SWITCH 2314-2SFP PNFL SWITCH 2214-2FX SMFL NAT 2304-2GC-2SFPFL SWITCH 2608 PNFL SWITCH 2204-2TC-2SFX
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-29060
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jun, 2021 | 15:45
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS) vulnerability was discovered in Color-String version 1.5.5 and below which occurs when the application is provided and checks a crafted invalid HWB string.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-color-string_projectn/a
Product-color-stringn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-28096
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2022 | 14:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS before 4.2.3 (when the proxy is used). An attacker can saturate the proxy connection table. This would result in the proxy denying any new connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldn/a
Product-stormshield_network_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2026-21434
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-12 Feb, 2026 | 18:18
Updated-12 Feb, 2026 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
webtransport-go affected by Memory Exhaustion Attack due to Missing Length Check in WT_CLOSE_SESSION Capsule

webtransport-go is an implementation of the WebTransport protocol. From 0.3.0 to 0.9.0, an attacker can cause excessive memory consumption in webtransport-go's session implementation by sending a WT_CLOSE_SESSION capsule containing an excessively large Application Error Message. The implementation does not enforce the draft-mandated limit of 1024 bytes on this field, allowing a peer to send an arbitrarily large message payload that is fully read and stored in memory. This allows an attacker to consume an arbitrary amount of memory. The attacker must transmit the full payload to achieve the memory consumption, but the lack of any upper bound makes large-scale attacks feasible given sufficient bandwidth. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.10.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quic-go
Product-webtransport-go
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-23053
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.63% / 69.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2021 | 12:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On version 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, when the brute force protection feature of BIG-IP Advanced WAF or BIG-IP ASM is enabled on a virtual server and the virtual server is under brute force attack, the MySQL database may run out of disk space due to lack of row limit on undisclosed tables in the MYSQL database. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewallbig-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP Advanced WAF and BIG-IP ASM
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-25414
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-11 Feb, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Aten PE8108 2.4.232 is vulnerable to denial of service (DOS).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-atenn/a
Product-pe8108_firmwarepe8108n/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-22210
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.70%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-06 May, 2021 | 13:19
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 13.2. When querying the repository branches through API, GitLab was ignoring a query parameter and returning a considerable amount of results.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-21000
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2021 | 11:05
Updated-15 Aug, 2025 | 20:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WAGO: PFC200 Denial of Service due to the number of connections to the runtime

On WAGO PFC200 devices in different firmware versions with special crafted packets an attacker with network access to the device could cause a denial of service for the login service of the runtime.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wagoWAGO
Product-750-8202750-831750-832_firmware750-8211750-893750-8202_firmware750-8216750-831_firmware750-8214750-881750-885_firmware750-829750-880750-8210_firmware750-823750-8203_firmware750-8213_firmware750-8214_firmware750-823_firmware750-881_firmware750-8212_firmware750-862750-8211_firmware750-8217_firmware750-882_firmware750-8207_firmware750-8203750-889_firmware750-891750-8212750-890_firmware750-8206_firmware750-8208_firmware750-832750-882750-852750-890750-8206750-8207750-8208750-889750-862_firmware750-893_firmware750-8204_firmware750-885750-8204750-8210750-8213750-8216_firmware750-852_firmware750-8217750-880_firmware750-829_firmware750-891_firmwareSeries Ethernet ControllerSeries PFC200 Controller
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-0695
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2025 | 11:11
Updated-12 Feb, 2025 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Cesanta Frozen versions less than 1.7 allows an attacker to induce a crash of the component embedding the library by supplying a maliciously crafted JSON as input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cesanta
Product-Frozen
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-20185
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 64.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2021 | 19:01
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found in Moodle before version 3.10.1, 3.9.4, 3.8.7 and 3.5.16 that messaging did not impose a character limit when sending messages, which could result in client-side (browser) denial of service for users receiving very large messages.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMoodle Pty Ltd
Product-moodlemoodle
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-1350
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 56.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 20:00
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Umbrella Dashboard Packet Flood Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Umbrella could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to negatively affect the performance of this service. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient rate limiting controls in the web UI. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTPS packets at a high and sustained rate. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to negatively affect the performance of the web UI. Cisco has addressed this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-umbrellaCisco Umbrella Insights Virtual Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-51393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Silicon Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Silicon Labs
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Feb, 2024 | 19:14
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Potential DoS due to BusFault and Assert in Ember ZNet legacy packet buffer

Due to an allocation of resources without limits, an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability exists in Silicon Labs Ember ZNet SDK prior to v7.4.0.0 (delivered as part of Silicon Labs Gecko SDK v4.4.0) which may enable attackers to trigger a bus fault and crash of the device, requiring a reboot in order to rejoin the network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-silabssilabs.comsilabs
Product-emberznetEmber ZNet SDKemberznet_sdk
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-56332
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.18%
||
7 Day CHG-0.39%
Published-03 Jan, 2025 | 20:19
Updated-10 Sep, 2025 | 15:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Next.js Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) with Server Actions

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 13.0.0 and prior to versions 13.5.8, 14.2.21, and 15.1.2, Next.js is vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack that allows attackers to construct requests that leaves requests to Server Actions hanging until the hosting provider cancels the function execution. This vulnerability can also be used as a Denial of Wallet (DoW) attack when deployed in providers billing by response times. (Note: Next.js server is idle during that time and only keeps the connection open. CPU and memory footprint are low during that time.). Deployments without any protection against long running Server Action invocations are especially vulnerable. Hosting providers like Vercel or Netlify set a default maximum duration on function execution to reduce the risk of excessive billing. This is the same issue as if the incoming HTTP request has an invalid `Content-Length` header or never closes. If the host has no other mitigations to those then this vulnerability is novel. This vulnerability affects only Next.js deployments using Server Actions. The issue was resolved in Next.js 13.5.8, 14.2.21, and 15.1.2. We recommend that users upgrade to a safe version. There are no official workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vercelvercel
Product-next.jsnext.js
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-55563
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 16:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Bitcoin Core through 27.2 allows transaction-relay jamming via an off-chain protocol attack, a related issue to CVE-2024-52913. For example, the outcome of an HTLC (Hashed Timelock Contract) can be changed because a flood of transaction traffic prevents propagation of certain Lightning channel transactions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aBitcoin Wiki
Product-bitcoin_coren/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-3967
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 39.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Oct, 2023 | 01:04
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 14:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DoS Vulnerability in Hitachi Ops Center Common Services

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Hitachi Ops Center Common Services on Linux allows DoS.This issue affects Hitachi Ops Center Common Services: before 10.9.3-00.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, IncHitachi, Ltd.
Product-ops_center_common_serviceslinux_kernelHitachi Ops Center Common Servicesops_center_common_services
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-4046
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2023 | 14:57
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In some circumstances, a stale value could have been used for a global variable in WASM JIT analysis. This resulted in incorrect compilation and a potentially exploitable crash in the content process. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 116, Firefox ESR < 102.14, and Firefox ESR < 115.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxMozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxdebian_linuxFirefox ESRFirefoxfirefox
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-52913
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 33.40%
||
7 Day CHG-0.07%
Published-18 Nov, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Bitcoin Core before 0.21.0, an attacker could prevent a node from seeing a specific unconfirmed transaction, because transaction re-requests are mishandled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aBitcoin Wiki
Product-bitcoin_coren/abitcoin_core
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-52796
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Nov, 2024 | 16:15
Updated-20 Nov, 2024 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Password Pusher's rate limiter can be bypassed by forging proxy headers

Password Pusher, an open source application to communicate sensitive information over the web, comes with a configurable rate limiter. In versions prior to v1.49.0, the rate limiter could be bypassed by forging proxy headers allowing bad actors to send unlimited traffic to the site potentially causing a denial of service. In v1.49.0, a fix was implemented to only authorize proxies on local IPs which resolves this issue. As a workaround, one may add rules to one's proxy and/or firewall to not accept external proxy headers such as `X-Forwarded-*` from clients.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pglombardopglombardo
Product-PasswordPusherpassword_pusher
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-38684
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jul, 2023 | 15:25
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 16:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Discourse vulnerable to ossible DDoS due to unbounded limits in various controller actions

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.0.6 of the `stable` branch and version 3.1.0.beta7 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, in multiple controller actions, Discourse accepts limit params but does not impose any upper bound on the values being accepted. Without an upper bound, the software may allow arbitrary users to generate DB queries which may end up exhausting the resources on the server. The issue is patched in version 3.0.6 of the `stable` branch and version 3.1.0.beta7 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Civilized Discourse Construction Kit, Inc.
Product-discoursediscoursediscourse
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2026-1102
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 18.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jan, 2026 | 13:33
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 21:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.3 before 18.6.4, 18.7 before 18.7.2, and 18.8 before 18.8.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to create a denial of service condition by sending repeated malformed SSH authentication requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2026-0398
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Open-Xchange
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Open-Xchange
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2026 | 14:20
Updated-09 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Crafted zones can lead to increased resource usage and crafted CNAME chains can lead to cache poisoning in Recursor

Crafted zones can lead to increased resource usage and crafted CNAME chains can lead to cache poisoning in Recursor.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-PowerDNS
Product-Recursor
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-59139
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.43%
||
7 Day CHG-0.04%
Published-12 Sep, 2025 | 13:03
Updated-17 Sep, 2025 | 20:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Hono has Body Limit Middleware Bypass

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. In versions prior to 4.9.7, a flaw in the `bodyLimit` middleware could allow bypassing the configured request body size limit when conflicting HTTP headers were present. The middleware previously prioritized the `Content-Length` header even when a `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` header was also included. According to the HTTP specification, `Content-Length` must be ignored in such cases. This discrepancy could allow oversized request bodies to bypass the configured limit. Most standards-compliant runtimes and reverse proxies may reject such malformed requests with `400 Bad Request`, so the practical impact depends on the runtime and deployment environment. If body size limits are used as a safeguard against large or malicious requests, this flaw could allow attackers to send oversized request bodies. The primary risk is denial of service (DoS) due to excessive memory or CPU consumption when handling very large requests. The implementation has been updated to align with the HTTP specification, ensuring that `Transfer-Encoding` takes precedence over `Content-Length`. The issue is fixed in Hono v4.9.7, and all users should upgrade immediately.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-honohonojs
Product-honohono
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-45526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-23 Oct, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in OPC Foundation OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard through 1.5.374.78. A remote attacker can send requests with invalid credentials and cause the server performance to degrade gradually.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopcfoundation
Product-n/aua-.netstandard
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-45412
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.94% / 75.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2024 | 15:19
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 16:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Yeti affected by a Potential Denial of Service due to the One Milion Unicode characters attack

Yeti bridges the gap between CTI and DFIR practitioners by providing a Forensics Intelligence platform and pipeline. Remote user-controlled data tags can reach a Unicode normalization with a compatibility form NFKD. Under Windows, such normalization is costly in resources and may lead to denial of service with attacks such as One Million Unicode payload. This can get worse with the use of special Unicode characters like U+2100 (â„€), or U+2105 (â„…) which could lead the payload size to be tripled. Versions prior to 2.1.11 are affected by this vulnerability. The patch is included in 2.1.11.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yeti-platformyeti-platform
Product-yetiyeti
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-34450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.05% / 14.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jul, 2023 | 16:36
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 13:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CometBFT PeerState JSON serialization deadlock

CometBFT is a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) middleware that takes a state transition machine and replicates it on many machines. An internal modification made in versions 0.34.28 and 0.37.1 to the way struct `PeerState` is serialized to JSON introduced a deadlock when new function MarshallJSON is called. This function can be called from two places. The first is via logs, setting the `consensus` logging module to "debug" level (should not happen in production), and setting the log output format to JSON. The second is via RPC `dump_consensus_state`. Case 1, which should not be hit in production, will eventually hit the deadlock in most goroutines, effectively halting the node. In case 2, only the data structures related to the first peer will be deadlocked, together with the thread(s) dealing with the RPC request(s). This means that only one of the channels of communication to the node's peers will be blocked. Eventually the peer will timeout and excluded from the list (typically after 2 minutes). The goroutines involved in the deadlock will not be garbage collected, but they will not interfere with the system after the peer is excluded. The theoretical worst case for case 2, is a network with only two validator nodes. In this case, each of the nodes only has one `PeerState` struct. If `dump_consensus_state` is called in either node (or both), the chain will halt until the peer connections time out, after which the nodes will reconnect (with different `PeerState` structs) and the chain will progress again. Then, the same process can be repeated. As the number of nodes in a network increases, and thus, the number of peer struct each node maintains, the possibility of reproducing the perturbation visible with two nodes decreases. Only the first `PeerState` struct will deadlock, and not the others (RPC `dump_consensus_state` accesses them in a for loop, so the deadlock at the first iteration causes the rest of the iterations of that "for" loop to never be reached). This regression was fixed in versions 0.34.29 and 0.37.2. Some workarounds are available. For case 1 (hitting the deadlock via logs), either don't set the log output to "json", leave at "plain", or don't set the consensus logging module to "debug", leave it at "info" or higher. For case 2 (hitting the deadlock via RPC `dump_consensus_state`), do not expose `dump_consensus_state` RPC endpoint to the public internet (e.g., via rules in one's nginx setup).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cometbftcometbft
Product-cometbftcometbft
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CWE ID-CWE-401
Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
CVE-2024-46666
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 36.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 14:09
Updated-22 Jul, 2025 | 21:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An allocation of resources without limits or throttling [CWE-770] vulnerability in FortiOS versions 7.6.0, versions 7.4.4 through 7.4.0, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent access to the GUI via specially crafted requests directed at specific endpoints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiosFortiOS
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-41132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.64% / 70.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jul, 2024 | 14:28
Updated-11 Sep, 2024 | 15:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SixLabors ImageSharp Allows Excessive Memory Allocation in Gif Decoder

ImageSharp is a 2D graphics API. A vulnerability discovered in the ImageSharp library, where the processing of specially crafted files can lead to excessive memory usage in the Gif decoder. The vulnerability is triggered when ImageSharp attempts to process image files that are designed to exploit this flaw. All users are advised to upgrade to v3.1.5 or v2.1.9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sixlaborsSixLaborssixlabors
Product-imagesharpImageSharpimagesharp
CWE ID-CWE-789
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-68388
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Elastic
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Elastic
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Dec, 2025 | 21:33
Updated-23 Dec, 2025 | 17:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Allocation of resources without limits or throttling (CWE-770) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause excessive allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and CPU via the integration of malicious IPv4 fragments, leading to a degradation in Packetbeat.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Elasticsearch BV
Product-packetbeatPacketbeat
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-68659
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 12.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2026 | 18:51
Updated-30 Jan, 2026 | 20:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Discourse has DoS vulnerability in username change endpoint

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Versions prior to 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0 have an application level denial of service vulnerabilityin the username change functionality at try.discourse.org. The vulnerability allows attackers to cause noticeable server delays and resource exhaustion by sending large JSON payloads to the username preference endpoint PUT /u//preferences/username, resulting in degraded performance for other users and endpoints. This issue is patched in versions 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0. No known workarounds are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Civilized Discourse Construction Kit, Inc.
Product-discoursediscourse
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-29479
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-21 Nov, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ribose RNP before 0.16.3 may hang when the input is malformed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ribosen/a
Product-rnpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-35915
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 21:05
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unbounded gas consumption in @openzeppelin/contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The target contract of an EIP-165 `supportsInterface` query can cause unbounded gas consumption by returning a lot of data, while it is generally assumed that this operation has a bounded cost. The issue has been fixed in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openzeppelinOpenZeppelin
Product-contractsopenzeppelin-ethcontracts_upgradeableopenzeppelin-solidityopenzeppelin-contracts
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-64702
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Dec, 2025 | 20:58
Updated-12 Dec, 2025 | 20:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
quic-go HTTP/3 QPACK Header Expansion DoS

quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. Versions 0.56.0 and below are vulnerable to excessive memory allocation through quic-go's HTTP/3 client and server implementations by sending a QPACK-encoded HEADERS frame that decodes into a large header field section (many unique header names and/or large values). The implementation builds an http.Header (used on the http.Request and http.Response, respectively), while only enforcing limits on the size of the (QPACK-compressed) HEADERS frame, but not on the decoded header, leading to memory exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 0.57.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quic-go
Product-quic-go
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-34439
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.03% / 76.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Oct, 2022 | 18:05
Updated-07 May, 2025 | 14:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.0.x-9.4.0.x contain allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service and performance issue on that node.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_powerscale_onefsPowerScale OneFS
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-33749
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Xen Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Xen Project
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 50.91%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 08:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

XAPI open file limit DoS It is possible for an unauthenticated client on the network to cause XAPI to hit its file-descriptor limit. This causes XAPI to be unable to accept new requests for other (trusted) clients, and blocks XAPI from carrying out any tasks that require the opening of file descriptors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-XapiXen Project
Product-xapiXapi
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-37309
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 47.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jun, 2024 | 13:59
Updated-04 Sep, 2025 | 19:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Client initialized Session-Renegotiation DoS

CrateDB is a distributed SQL database. A high-risk vulnerability has been identified in versions prior to 5.7.2 where the TLS endpoint (port 4200) permits client-initiated renegotiation. In this scenario, an attacker can exploit this feature to repeatedly request renegotiation of security parameters during an ongoing TLS session. This flaw could lead to excessive consumption of CPU resources, resulting in potential server overload and service disruption. The vulnerability was confirmed using an openssl client where the command `R` initiates renegotiation, followed by the server confirming with `RENEGOTIATING`. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a denial of service attack by exhausting server CPU resources through repeated TLS renegotiations. This impacts the availability of services running on the affected server, posing a significant risk to operational stability and security. TLS 1.3 explicitly forbids renegotiation, since it closes a window of opportunity for an attack. Version 5.7.2 of CrateDB contains the fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cratedbcratecratedb
Product-cratedbcratecratedb
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-36403
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.44% / 62.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jan, 2025 | 19:16
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of service/high operating costs through unauthenticated downloads in Matrix Media Repo

Matrix Media Repo (MMR) is a highly configurable multi-homeserver media repository for Matrix. MMR before version 1.3.5 is vulnerable to unbounded disk consumption, where an unauthenticated adversary can induce it to download and cache large amounts of remote media files. MMR's typical operating environment uses S3-like storage as a backend, with file-backed store as an alternative option. Instances using a file-backed store or those which self-host an S3 storage system are therefore vulnerable to a disk fill attack. Once the disk is full, authenticated users will be unable to upload new media, resulting in denial of service. For instances configured to use a cloud-based S3 storage option, this could result in high service fees instead of a denial of service. MMR 1.3.5 introduces a new default-on "leaky bucket" rate limit to reduce the amount of data a user can request at a time. This does not fully address the issue, but does limit an unauthenticated user's ability to request large amounts of data. Operators should note that the leaky bucket implementation introduced in MMR 1.3.5 requires the IP address associated with the request to be forwarded, to avoid mistakenly applying the rate limit to the reverse proxy instead. To avoid this issue, the reverse proxy should populate the X-Forwarded-For header when sending the request to MMR. Operators who cannot update may wish to lower the maximum file size they allow and implement harsh rate limits, though this can still lead to a large amount of data to be downloaded.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-t2bott2bot
Product-matrix-media-repomatrix-media-repo
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-35176
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.90% / 91.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2024 | 15:13
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
REXML contains a denial of service vulnerability

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem before 3.2.6 has a denial of service vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many `<`s in an attribute value. Those who need to parse untrusted XMLs may be impacted to this vulnerability. The REXML gem 3.2.7 or later include the patch to fix this vulnerability. As a workaround, don't parse untrusted XMLs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby
Product-rexmlrexmlrexml
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-34358
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2024 | 14:26
Updated-03 Sep, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TYPO3 vulnerable to an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in the ShowImageController

TYPO3 is an enterprise content management system. Starting in version 9.0.0 and prior to versions 9.5.48 ELTS, 10.4.45 ELTS, 11.5.37 LTS, 12.4.15 LTS, and 13.1.1, the `ShowImageController` (`_eID tx_cms_showpic_`) lacks a cryptographic HMAC-signature on the `frame` HTTP query parameter (e.g. `/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic?file=3&...&frame=12345`). This allows adversaries to instruct the system to produce an arbitrary number of thumbnail images on the server side. TYPO3 versions 9.5.48 ELTS, 10.4.45 ELTS, 11.5.37 LTS, 12.4.15 LTS, 13.1.1 fix the problem described.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TYPO3 Association
Product-typo3typo3typo3
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2008-5180
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-82.34% / 99.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Nov, 2008 | 15:00
Updated-15 Oct, 2024 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft Communicator, and Communicator in Microsoft Office 2010 beta, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of SIP INVITE requests, which trigger the creation of many sessions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-office_communicatorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-38492
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2023 | 15:43
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Kirby vulnerable to denial of service from unlimited password lengths

Kirby is a content management system. A vulnerability in versions prior to 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6 affects all Kirby sites with user accounts (unless Kirby's API and Panel are disabled in the config). The real-world impact of this vulnerability is limited, however we still recommend to update to one of the patch releases because they also fix more severe vulnerabilities. Kirby's authentication endpoint did not limit the password length. This allowed attackers to provide a password with a length up to the server's maximum request body length. Validating that password against the user's actual password requires hashing the provided password, which requires more CPU and memory resources (and therefore processing time) the longer the provided password gets. This could be abused by an attacker to cause the website to become unresponsive or unavailable. Because Kirby comes with a built-in brute force protection, the impact of this vulnerability is limited to 10 failed logins from each IP address and 10 failed logins for each existing user per hour. The problem has been patched in Kirby 3.5.8.3, 3.6.6.3, 3.7.5.2, 3.8.4.1, and 3.9.6. In all of the mentioned releases, the maintainers have added password length limits in the affected code so that passwords longer than 1000 bytes are immediately blocked, both when setting a password and when logging in.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-getkirbygetkirby
Product-kirbykirby
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found