Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-7734

Summary
Assigner-CERTVDE
Assigner Org ID-270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c
Published At-10 Sep, 2024 | 08:03
Updated At-10 Sep, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected At-
Credits

Phoenix Contact: Multiple mGuard devices are vulnerable to a drain of open file descriptors.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:CERTVDE
Assigner Org ID:270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c
Published At:10 Sep, 2024 | 08:03
Updated At:10 Sep, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Phoenix Contact: Multiple mGuard devices are vulnerable to a drain of open file descriptors.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

Affected Products
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 2102
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 2105
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4102 PCI
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4102 PCIE
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4302
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD 4305
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CORE TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD CORE TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD GT/GT
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD GT/GT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCI4000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCI4000 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCIE4000
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-B
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-M
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-P
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD SMART2
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
FL MGUARD SMART2 VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 3G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G ATT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS2000 4G VZW VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 3G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G ATT VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGPHOENIX CONTACT
Product
TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VZW VPN
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-770CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-770
Description: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
N/A
Hyperlink: https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_core_tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
fl_mguard_4305_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_2102_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_2105_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4102_pcie_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4102_pci_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4302_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_4305_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 10.4.1 (semver)
Vendor
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGphoenixcontact
Product
tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 8.9.3 (semver)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:info@cert.vde.com
Published At:10 Sep, 2024 | 08:15
Updated At:28 Sep, 2024 | 23:56

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the behavior of the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service by establishing a high number of TCP connections to the pathfinder TCP encapsulation service. The impact is limited to blocking of valid IPsec VPN peers.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CPE Matches

Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:tc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_smart2>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_smart2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pcie4000>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pcie4000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_pci4000>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_pci4000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware>>Versions before 8.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
phoenixcontact
>>fl_mguard_gt\/gt>>-
cpe:2.3:h:phoenixcontact:fl_mguard_gt\/gt:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-770Primaryinfo@cert.vde.com
CWE ID: CWE-770
Type: Primary
Source: info@cert.vde.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052info@cert.vde.com
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2024-052
Source: info@cert.vde.com
Resource:
Mitigation
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

80Records found

CVE-2017-10108
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Serialization). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u151, 7u141 and 8u131; Java SE Embedded: 8u131; JRockit: R28.3.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-enterprise_linux_desktoponcommand_unified_manageroncommand_balanceplug-in_for_symantec_netbackupenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_eusenterprise_linux_workstationjdkactive_iq_unified_managersatellitesteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagedebian_linuxenterprise_linux_servercloud_backupenterprise_linux_server_ausoncommand_insightvasa_provider_for_clustered_data_ontapfl_mguard_dmoncommand_performance_managerjreelement_softwaresnapmanagervirtual_storage_consoleoncommand_shifte-series_santricity_storage_managerstorage_replication_adapter_for_clustered_data_ontapjrockite-series_santricity_os_controllerJava
CVE-2017-10053
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.76% / 72.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u151, 7u141 and 8u131; Java SE Embedded: 8u131; JRockit: R28.3.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-enterprise_linux_desktoponcommand_unified_manageroncommand_balanceplug-in_for_symantec_netbackupenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_eusenterprise_linux_workstationjdkactive_iq_unified_managersatellitevasa_providersteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagedebian_linuxenterprise_linux_servercloud_backupenterprise_linux_server_ausoncommand_insightfl_mguard_dmoncommand_performance_managerjreelement_softwaresnapmanagervirtual_storage_consoleoncommand_shifte-series_santricity_storage_managerstorage_replication_adapter_for_clustered_data_ontapjrockite-series_santricity_os_controllerJava
CVE-2023-2673
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 3.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jun, 2023 | 06:16
Updated-03 Jan, 2025 | 01:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHOENIX CONTACT: FL/TC MGUARD prone to Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT FL/TC MGUARD Family in multiple versions may allow UDP packets to bypass the filter rules and access the solely connected device behind the MGUARD which can be used for flooding attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_mguard_core_tx_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpnfl_mguard_2102_firmwarefl_mguard_2102fl_mguard_4102_pci_firmwarefl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_4302_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmwarefl_mguard_4102_pcie_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-mfl_mguard_core_tx_vpnfl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/txfl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000fl_mguard_smart2_firmwarefl_mguard_centerportfl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_4302fl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-bfl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpnfl_mguard_4102_pcifl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gtfl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpnfl_mguard_4102_pciefl_mguard_core_txfl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtxfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-pfl_mguard_pci4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000_vpnFL MGUARD 4102 PCIEFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-BFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD 2102FL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPNFL MGUARD 4102 PCIFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTXFL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000FL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPNFL MGUARD CENTERPORTFL MGUARD PCI4000 VPNFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TXFL MGUARD PCIE4000FL MGUARD GT/GTFL MGUARD SMART2 VPNFL MGUARD CORE TX VPNFL MGUARD CORE TXFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-MFL MGUARD 4302FL MGUARD SMART2FL MGUARD GT/GT VPNFL MGUARD PCI4000FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-P
CWE ID-CWE-1287
Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input
CVE-2025-24002
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2025 | 06:58
Updated-11 Jul, 2025 | 14:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MQTT DoS Vulnerability in German EV Charging Stations

An unauthenticated remote attacker can use MQTT messages to crash a service on charging stations complying with German Calibration Law, resulting in a temporary denial-of-service for these stations until they got restarted by the watchdog.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-charx_sec-3100charx_sec-3150charx_sec-3050_firmwarecharx_sec-3050charx_sec-3100_firmwarecharx_sec-3150_firmwarecharx_sec-3000_firmwarecharx_sec-3000CHARX SEC-3050CHARX SEC-3150CHARX SEC-3100CHARX SEC-3000
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-21003
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2021 | 18:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Phoenix Contact FL SWITCH SMCS series products

In Phoenix Contact FL SWITCH SMCS series products in multiple versions fragmented TCP-Packets may cause a Denial of Service of Web-, SNMP- and ICMP-Echo services. The switching functionality of the device is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_switch_smcs_16txfl_switch_smn_8tx-pnfl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_sm_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8tx-mfl_switch_smcs_4tx-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_6tx\/2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_8gt_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_8tx-pnfl_switch_smcs_6gt\/2sfpfl_switch_smcs_8tx-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_8tx-pn_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8tx-m_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fxfl_switch_smcs_8tx_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2pof-pnfl_switch_smcs_4tx-pnfl_switch_smn_6tx\/2pof-pn_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fxfl_nat_smn_8tx_firmwarefl_nat_smn_8txfl_switch_smcs_8txfl_switch_smcs_8gtfl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx-sm_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_14tx\/2fx-smfl_switch_smcs_6tx\/2sfpfl_switch_smcs_16tx_firmwarefl_switch_smcs_6gt\/2sfp_firmwarefl_switch_smn_6tx\/2fx_smFL NATFL SWITCH
CWE ID-CWE-404
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
CVE-2019-10953
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.72% / 71.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2019 | 14:02
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ABB, Phoenix Contact, Schneider Electric, Siemens, WAGO - Programmable Logic Controllers, multiple versions. Researchers have found some controllers are susceptible to a denial-of-service attack due to a flood of network packets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wagon/aABBPhoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KGSiemens AG
Product-ethernet_firmwarebacnet\/ip6es7211-1ae40-0xb0modicon_m221_firmwareknx_ip_firmwareknx_ipethernet6es7314-6eh04-0ab0modicon_m221pm554-tp-eth_firmware6es7314-6eh04-0ab0_firmware6ed1052-1cc01-0ba8pm554-tp-eth6es7211-1ae40-0xb0_firmwarepfc100_firmwarepfc100ilc_151_eth_firmwarebacnet\/ip_firmware6ed1052-1cc01-0ba8_firmwareilc_151_ethABB, Phoenix Contact, Schneider Electric, Siemens, WAGO - Programmable Logic Controllers
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-33541
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 78.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2021 | 18:26
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Phoenix Contact: ILC1x Industrial controllers affected by Denial-of-Service vulnerability

Phoenix Contact Classic Line Controllers ILC1x0 and ILC1x1 in all versions/variants are affected by a Denial-of-Service vulnerability. The communication protocols and device access do not feature authentication measures. Remote attackers can use specially crafted IP packets to cause a denial of service on the PLC's network communication module. A successful attack stops all network communication. To restore the network connectivity the device needs to be restarted. The automation task is not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-ilc1x0_firmwareilc1x1_firmwareilc1x0ilc1x1ILC1x
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2018-25112
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2025 | 09:37
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 14:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHOENIX CONTACT: ILC 1x1 ETH Denial of Service

An unauthenticated remote attacker may use an uncontrolled resource consumption in the IEC 61131 program of the affected products by creating large amounts of network traffic that needs to be handled by the ILC. This results in a Denial-of-Service of the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-ILC 131ILC 191 ETHILC 171ILC 151
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-3480
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.59% / 68.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 10:58
Updated-29 Apr, 2025 | 20:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial-of-Service vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT mGuard product family

A remote, unauthenticated attacker could cause a denial-of-service of PHOENIX CONTACT FL MGUARD and TC MGUARD devices below version 8.9.0 by sending a larger number of unauthenticated HTTPS connections originating from different source IP’s. Configuring firewall limits for incoming connections cannot prevent the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-fl_mguard_core_tx_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000fl_mguard_pcie4000_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_vpn-1000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-m_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2_vpnfl_mguard_centerport_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-b_firmwarefl_mguard_smart2fl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/txfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pcie4000fl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-mfl_mguard_core_tx_vpnfl_mguard_smart2_vpn_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_4g_att_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/txfl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000fl_mguard_smart2_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_centerportfl_mguard_pci4000_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx-bfl_mguard_rs2000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpnfl_mguard_rs2005_tx_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_att_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vzw_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx_vpntc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpntc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtx_vpnfl_mguard_gt\/gt_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gt_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_gt\/gtfl_mguard_core_txfl_mguard_core_tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_delta_tx\/tx_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_rs4004_tx\/dtxtc_mguard_rs2000_4g_vzw_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-pfl_mguard_pci4000_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_3g_vpnfl_mguard_rs4000_tx\/tx-p_firmwaretc_mguard_rs2000_3g_vpn_firmwaretc_mguard_rs4000_4g_vpn_firmwarefl_mguard_pci4000_vpnTC MGUARD RS2000 4G VZW VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-PTC MGUARD RS4000 4G ATT VPNFL MGUARD CORE TX VPNTC MGUARD RS2000 3G VPNTC MGUARD RS4000 3G VPNTC MGUARD RS2000 4G VPNFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX-BFL MGUARD PCI4000FL MGUARD GT/GTFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TXFL MGUARD CENTERPORTFL MGUARD SMART2 VPNFL MGUARD RS2005 TX VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000FL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX-MFL MGUARD GT/GT VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTX VPNFL MGUARD RS2000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TXFL MGUARD SMART2FL MGUARD CORE TXFL MGUARD DELTA TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD RS4004 TX/DTXTC MGUARD RS2000 4G ATT VPNFL MGUARD RS4000 TX/TX VPNFL MGUARD CENTERPORT VPN-1000TC MGUARD RS4000 4G VZW VPNFL MGUARD PCIE4000 VPNTC MGUARD RS4000 4G VPNFL MGUARD PCI4000 VPN
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-52796
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Nov, 2024 | 16:15
Updated-20 Nov, 2024 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Password Pusher's rate limiter can be bypassed by forging proxy headers

Password Pusher, an open source application to communicate sensitive information over the web, comes with a configurable rate limiter. In versions prior to v1.49.0, the rate limiter could be bypassed by forging proxy headers allowing bad actors to send unlimited traffic to the site potentially causing a denial of service. In v1.49.0, a fix was implemented to only authorize proxies on local IPs which resolves this issue. As a workaround, one may add rules to one's proxy and/or firewall to not accept external proxy headers such as `X-Forwarded-*` from clients.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pglombardopglombardo
Product-PasswordPusherpassword_pusher
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-45412
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 68.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2024 | 15:19
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 16:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Yeti affected by a Potential Denial of Service due to the One Milion Unicode characters attack

Yeti bridges the gap between CTI and DFIR practitioners by providing a Forensics Intelligence platform and pipeline. Remote user-controlled data tags can reach a Unicode normalization with a compatibility form NFKD. Under Windows, such normalization is costly in resources and may lead to denial of service with attacks such as One Million Unicode payload. This can get worse with the use of special Unicode characters like U+2100 (℀), or U+2105 (℅) which could lead the payload size to be tripled. Versions prior to 2.1.11 are affected by this vulnerability. The patch is included in 2.1.11.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yeti-platformyeti-platform
Product-yetiyeti
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-45526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-23 Oct, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in OPC Foundation OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard through 1.5.374.78. A remote attacker can send requests with invalid credentials and cause the server performance to degrade gradually.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopcfoundation
Product-n/aua-.netstandard
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-4225
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-27 Aug, 2025 | 19:33
Updated-27 Aug, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitLab

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 14.1 before 18.1.5, 18.2 before 18.2.5, and 18.3 before 18.3.1 that that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition affecting all users by sending specially crafted GraphQL requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-GitLab
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2020-12697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 55.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2020 | 12:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The direct_mail extension through 5.2.3 for TYPO3 allows Denial of Service via log entries.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dkdn/a
Product-direct_mailn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2005-4650
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 16.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2006 | 01:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 01:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Joomla! 1.03 does not restrict the number of "Search" Mambots, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a large number of Search Mambots.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJoomla!
Product-joomla\!n/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-41132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.29% / 78.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jul, 2024 | 14:28
Updated-11 Sep, 2024 | 15:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SixLabors ImageSharp Allows Excessive Memory Allocation in Gif Decoder

ImageSharp is a 2D graphics API. A vulnerability discovered in the ImageSharp library, where the processing of specially crafted files can lead to excessive memory usage in the Gif decoder. The vulnerability is triggered when ImageSharp attempts to process image files that are designed to exploit this flaw. All users are advised to upgrade to v3.1.5 or v2.1.9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sixlaborsSixLaborssixlabors
Product-imagesharpImageSharpimagesharp
CWE ID-CWE-789
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-36403
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.41%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-16 Jan, 2025 | 19:16
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of service/high operating costs through unauthenticated downloads in Matrix Media Repo

Matrix Media Repo (MMR) is a highly configurable multi-homeserver media repository for Matrix. MMR before version 1.3.5 is vulnerable to unbounded disk consumption, where an unauthenticated adversary can induce it to download and cache large amounts of remote media files. MMR's typical operating environment uses S3-like storage as a backend, with file-backed store as an alternative option. Instances using a file-backed store or those which self-host an S3 storage system are therefore vulnerable to a disk fill attack. Once the disk is full, authenticated users will be unable to upload new media, resulting in denial of service. For instances configured to use a cloud-based S3 storage option, this could result in high service fees instead of a denial of service. MMR 1.3.5 introduces a new default-on "leaky bucket" rate limit to reduce the amount of data a user can request at a time. This does not fully address the issue, but does limit an unauthenticated user's ability to request large amounts of data. Operators should note that the leaky bucket implementation introduced in MMR 1.3.5 requires the IP address associated with the request to be forwarded, to avoid mistakenly applying the rate limit to the reverse proxy instead. To avoid this issue, the reverse proxy should populate the X-Forwarded-For header when sending the request to MMR. Operators who cannot update may wish to lower the maximum file size they allow and implement harsh rate limits, though this can still lead to a large amount of data to be downloaded.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-t2bott2bot
Product-matrix-media-repomatrix-media-repo
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-31369
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Oct, 2021 | 18:17
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: MX Series: Traffic drops will be observed if MS-MPC/MS-PIC resources are consumed by certain traffic causing a partial DoS

On MX Series platforms with MS-MPC/MS-MIC, an Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated network attacker to cause a partial Denial of Service (DoS) with a high rate of specific traffic. If a Class of Service (CoS) rule is attached to the service-set and a high rate of specific traffic is processed by this service-set, for some of the other traffic which has services applied and is being processed by this MS-MPC/MS-MIC drops will be observed. Continued receipted of this high rate of specific traffic will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MS-MPC/MS-MIC: All versions prior to 17.4R3-S5; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S5; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S6; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S5; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3-S1; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2-S1, 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-mx2008mx960mx240mx10008mx150mx10mx2020mx10003mx10016mx2010mx5mx10000mx204mx480mx104junosmx80mx40Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-35176
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.57% / 87.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2024 | 15:13
Updated-07 Mar, 2025 | 01:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
REXML contains a denial of service vulnerability

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem before 3.2.6 has a denial of service vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many `<`s in an attribute value. Those who need to parse untrusted XMLs may be impacted to this vulnerability. The REXML gem 3.2.7 or later include the patch to fix this vulnerability. As a workaround, don't parse untrusted XMLs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby
Product-rexmlrexml
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-31152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.74% / 81.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.50%
Published-30 Oct, 2024 | 13:35
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LevelOne WBR-6012 router with firmware R0.40e6 is vulnerable to improper resource allocation within its web application, where a series of crafted HTTP requests can cause a reboot. This could lead to network service interruptions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-level1LevelOnelevelone
Product-wbr-6012_firmwarewbr-6012WBR-6012wbr-6012
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-29025
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2024 | 20:09
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Netty HttpPostRequestDecoder can OOM

Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. The `HttpPostRequestDecoder` can be tricked to accumulate data. While the decoder can store items on the disk if configured so, there are no limits to the number of fields the form can have, an attacher can send a chunked post consisting of many small fields that will be accumulated in the `bodyListHttpData` list. The decoder cumulates bytes in the `undecodedChunk` buffer until it can decode a field, this field can cumulate data without limits. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.108.Final.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Netty Project
Product-nettynetty
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-28182
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-19.38% / 95.15%
||
7 Day CHG+0.44%
Published-04 Apr, 2024 | 14:41
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reading unbounded number of HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames to cause excessive CPU usage

nghttp2 is an implementation of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2 in C. The nghttp2 library prior to version 1.61.0 keeps reading the unbounded number of HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames even after a stream is reset to keep HPACK context in sync. This causes excessive CPU usage to decode HPACK stream. nghttp2 v1.61.0 mitigates this vulnerability by limiting the number of CONTINUATION frames it accepts per stream. There is no workaround for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nghttp2nghttp2
Product-nghttp2nghttp2
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-23053
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.87% / 74.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2021 | 12:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On version 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, when the brute force protection feature of BIG-IP Advanced WAF or BIG-IP ASM is enabled on a virtual server and the virtual server is under brute force attack, the MySQL database may run out of disk space due to lack of row limit on undisclosed tables in the MYSQL database. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewallbig-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP Advanced WAF and BIG-IP ASM
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-22210
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2021 | 13:19
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 13.2. When querying the repository branches through API, GitLab was ignoring a query parameter and returning a considerable amount of results.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-20526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.39% / 59.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2024 | 17:53
Updated-31 Oct, 2024 | 01:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the SSH server of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition for the SSH server of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error when an SSH session is established. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted SSH messages to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust available SSH resources on the affected device so that new SSH connections to the device are denied, resulting in a DoS condition. Existing SSH connections to the device would continue to function normally. The device must be rebooted manually to recover. However, user traffic would not be impacted and could be managed using a remote application such as Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Softwareadaptive_security_appliance_software
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-21000
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2021 | 11:05
Updated-15 Aug, 2025 | 20:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WAGO: PFC200 Denial of Service due to the number of connections to the runtime

On WAGO PFC200 devices in different firmware versions with special crafted packets an attacker with network access to the device could cause a denial of service for the login service of the runtime.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wagoWAGO
Product-750-8202750-831750-832_firmware750-8211750-893750-8202_firmware750-8216750-831_firmware750-8214750-881750-885_firmware750-829750-880750-8210_firmware750-823750-8203_firmware750-8213_firmware750-8214_firmware750-823_firmware750-881_firmware750-8212_firmware750-862750-8211_firmware750-8217_firmware750-882_firmware750-8207_firmware750-8203750-889_firmware750-891750-8212750-890_firmware750-8206_firmware750-8208_firmware750-832750-882750-852750-890750-8206750-8207750-8208750-889750-862_firmware750-893_firmware750-8204_firmware750-885750-8204750-8210750-8213750-8216_firmware750-852_firmware750-8217750-880_firmware750-829_firmware750-891_firmwareSeries Ethernet ControllerSeries PFC200 Controller
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-46666
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 14:09
Updated-22 Jul, 2025 | 21:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An allocation of resources without limits or throttling [CWE-770] vulnerability in FortiOS versions 7.6.0, versions 7.4.4 through 7.4.0, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent access to the GUI via specially crafted requests directed at specific endpoints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiosFortiOS
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-10599
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.94% / 75.29%
||
7 Day CHG+0.14%
Published-31 Oct, 2024 | 21:31
Updated-04 Nov, 2024 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Tongda OA 2017 package_static_resources.php resource consumption

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Tongda OA 2017 up to 11.7. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /inc/package_static_resources.php. The manipulation leads to resource consumption. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tongda2000Tongdatongda
Product-office_anywhereOA 2017oa_2017
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-32035
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2024 | 19:59
Updated-09 Jan, 2025 | 18:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value in SixLabors.ImageSharp

ImageSharp is a 2D graphics API. A vulnerability discovered in the ImageSharp library, where the processing of specially crafted files can lead to excessive memory usage in image decoders. The vulnerability is triggered when ImageSharp attempts to process image files that are designed to exploit this flaw. This flaw can be exploited to cause a denial of service (DoS) by depleting process memory, thereby affecting applications and services that rely on ImageSharp for image processing tasks. Users and administrators are advised to update to the latest version of ImageSharp that addresses this vulnerability to mitigate the risk of exploitation. The problem has been patched in v3.1.4 and v2.1.8.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sixlaborsSixLaborssixlabors
Product-imagesharpImageSharpimagesharp
CWE ID-CWE-789
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-5625
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 23.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2023 | 13:28
Updated-06 Dec, 2024 | 11:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Python-eventlet: patch regression for cve-2021-21419 in some red hat builds

A regression was introduced in the Red Hat build of python-eventlet due to a change in the patch application strategy, resulting in a patch for CVE-2021-21419 not being applied for all builds of all products.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-openshift_container_platform_ibm_z_systemsenterprise_linuxopenshift_container_platform_for_arm64openshift_container_platform_for_poweropenstack_platformopenshift_container_platform_for_linuxoneIronic content for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 8Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2019-16770
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.36% / 57.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2019 | 19:35
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Potential DOS attack in Puma

In Puma before versions 3.12.2 and 4.3.1, a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma's reactor and create a denial of service attack. If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough. This vulnerability is patched in Puma 4.3.1 and 3.12.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxPuma
Product-pumadebian_linuxpuma
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-0695
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.82%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-27 Jan, 2025 | 11:11
Updated-12 Feb, 2025 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Cesanta Frozen versions less than 1.7 allows an attacker to induce a crash of the component embedding the library by supplying a maliciously crafted JSON as input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cesanta
Product-Frozen
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-34450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.05% / 14.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jul, 2023 | 16:36
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 13:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CometBFT PeerState JSON serialization deadlock

CometBFT is a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) middleware that takes a state transition machine and replicates it on many machines. An internal modification made in versions 0.34.28 and 0.37.1 to the way struct `PeerState` is serialized to JSON introduced a deadlock when new function MarshallJSON is called. This function can be called from two places. The first is via logs, setting the `consensus` logging module to "debug" level (should not happen in production), and setting the log output format to JSON. The second is via RPC `dump_consensus_state`. Case 1, which should not be hit in production, will eventually hit the deadlock in most goroutines, effectively halting the node. In case 2, only the data structures related to the first peer will be deadlocked, together with the thread(s) dealing with the RPC request(s). This means that only one of the channels of communication to the node's peers will be blocked. Eventually the peer will timeout and excluded from the list (typically after 2 minutes). The goroutines involved in the deadlock will not be garbage collected, but they will not interfere with the system after the peer is excluded. The theoretical worst case for case 2, is a network with only two validator nodes. In this case, each of the nodes only has one `PeerState` struct. If `dump_consensus_state` is called in either node (or both), the chain will halt until the peer connections time out, after which the nodes will reconnect (with different `PeerState` structs) and the chain will progress again. Then, the same process can be repeated. As the number of nodes in a network increases, and thus, the number of peer struct each node maintains, the possibility of reproducing the perturbation visible with two nodes decreases. Only the first `PeerState` struct will deadlock, and not the others (RPC `dump_consensus_state` accesses them in a for loop, so the deadlock at the first iteration causes the rest of the iterations of that "for" loop to never be reached). This regression was fixed in versions 0.34.29 and 0.37.2. Some workarounds are available. For case 1 (hitting the deadlock via logs), either don't set the log output to "json", leave at "plain", or don't set the consensus logging module to "debug", leave it at "info" or higher. For case 2 (hitting the deadlock via RPC `dump_consensus_state`), do not expose `dump_consensus_state` RPC endpoint to the public internet (e.g., via rules in one's nginx setup).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cometbftcometbft
Product-cometbftcometbft
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CWE ID-CWE-401
Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
CVE-2023-51393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Silicon Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Silicon Labs
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Feb, 2024 | 19:14
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Potential DoS due to BusFault and Assert in Ember ZNet legacy packet buffer

Due to an allocation of resources without limits, an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability exists in Silicon Labs Ember ZNet SDK prior to v7.4.0.0 (delivered as part of Silicon Labs Gecko SDK v4.4.0) which may enable attackers to trigger a bus fault and crash of the device, requiring a reboot in order to rejoin the network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-silabssilabs.comsilabs
Product-emberznetEmber ZNet SDKemberznet_sdk
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-3153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 11:13
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 14:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Service monitor mac flow is not rate limited

A flaw was found in Open Virtual Network where the service monitor MAC does not properly rate limit. This issue could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service, including on deployments with CoPP enabled and properly configured.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovnn/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-open_virtual_networkopenshift_container_platformenterprise_linuxfast_datapathovnFast Datapath for RHEL 7Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)Fast Datapath for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Fast Datapath for RHEL 8Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-29479
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-04 Feb, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ribose RNP before 0.16.3 may hang when the input is malformed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ribosen/a
Product-rnpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26048
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-36.14% / 96.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2023 | 20:30
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OutOfMemoryError for large multipart without filename in Eclipse Jetty

Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. In affected versions servlets with multipart support (e.g. annotated with `@MultipartConfig`) that call `HttpServletRequest.getParameter()` or `HttpServletRequest.getParts()` may cause `OutOfMemoryError` when the client sends a multipart request with a part that has a name but no filename and very large content. This happens even with the default settings of `fileSizeThreshold=0` which should stream the whole part content to disk. An attacker client may send a large multipart request and cause the server to throw `OutOfMemoryError`. However, the server may be able to recover after the `OutOfMemoryError` and continue its service -- although it may take some time. This issue has been patched in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, and 11.0.14. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may set the multipart parameter `maxRequestSize` which must be set to a non-negative value, so the whole multipart content is limited (although still read into memory).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-jettyjetty.project
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-54121
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 20.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2025 | 20:06
Updated-22 Jul, 2025 | 19:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Starlette has possible denial-of-service vector when parsing large files in multipart forms

Starlette is a lightweight ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) framework/toolkit, designed for building async web services in Python. In versions 0.47.1 and below, when parsing a multi-part form with large files (greater than the default max spool size) starlette will block the main thread to roll the file over to disk. This blocks the event thread which means the application can't accept new connections. The UploadFile code has a minor bug where instead of just checking for self._in_memory, the logic should also check if the additional bytes will cause a rollover. The vulnerability is fixed in version 0.47.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-encode
Product-starlette
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-54500
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2025 | 14:46
Updated-13 Aug, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTTP/2 Vulnerability

An HTTP/2 implementation flaw allows a denial-of-service (DoS) that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames in order to break the max concurrent streams limit (HTTP/2 MadeYouReset Attack).  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-BIG-IPBIG-IP Next for KubernetesBIG-IP Next CNFBIG-IP NextBIG-IP Next SPK
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-54939
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-27 Aug, 2025 | 15:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.3.1 has an lsquic_engine_packet_in memory leak.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-litespeedtechlitespeedtech
Product-litespeed_web_adclsquicopenlitespeedlitespeed_web_serverLSQUIC
CWE ID-CWE-401
Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-54575
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2025 | 19:55
Updated-31 Jul, 2025 | 18:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ImageSharp Triggers an Infinite Loop in its GIF Decoder When Skipping Malformed Comment Extension Blocks

ImageSharp is a 2D graphics library. In versions below 2.1.11 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.10, a specially crafted GIF file containing a malformed comment extension block (with a missing block terminator) can cause the ImageSharp GIF decoder to enter an infinite loop while attempting to skip the block. This leads to a denial of service. Applications processing untrusted GIF input should upgrade to a patched version. This issue is fixed in versions 2.1.11 and 3.1.11.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SixLabors
Product-ImageSharp
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2021-28096
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.38% / 58.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2022 | 14:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS before 4.2.3 (when the proxy is used). An attacker can saturate the proxy connection table. This would result in the proxy denying any new connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldn/a
Product-stormshield_network_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-54879
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.82%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-05 Aug, 2025 | 23:39
Updated-26 Aug, 2025 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Mastodon e‑mail throttle misconfiguration allows unlimited email confirmations against unconfirmed emails

Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub Mastodon which facilitates LDAP configuration for authentication. In versions 3.1.5 through 4.2.24, 4.3.0 through 4.3.11 and 4.4.0 through 4.4.3, Mastodon's rate-limiting system has a critical configuration error where the email-based throttle for confirmation emails incorrectly checks the password reset path instead of the confirmation path, effectively disabling per-email limits for confirmation requests. This allows attackers to bypass rate limits by rotating IP addresses and send unlimited confirmation emails to any email address, as only a weak IP-based throttle (25 requests per 5 minutes) remains active. The vulnerability enables denial-of-service attacks that can overwhelm mail queues and facilitate user harassment through confirmation email spam. This is fixed in versions 4.2.24, 4.3.11 and 4.4.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-joinmastodonmastodon
Product-mastodonmastodon
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-0809
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 5.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2023 | 18:56
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Mosquitto before 2.0.16, excessive memory is allocated based on malicious initial packets that are not CONNECT packets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-mosquittoMosquitto
CWE ID-CWE-789
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-4820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.08%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-18 Jun, 2025 | 15:45
Updated-06 Aug, 2025 | 17:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect congestion window growth by optimistic ACK

Impact Cloudflare quiche was discovered to be vulnerable to incorrect congestion window growth, which could cause it to send data at a rate faster than the path might actually support. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability by first completing a handshake and initiating a congestion-controlled data transfer towards itself. Then, it could manipulate the victim's congestion control state by sending ACK frames exercising an opportunistic ACK attack; see RFC 9000 Section 21.4. The victim could grow the congestion window beyond typical expectations and allow more bytes in flight than the path might really support. Patches quiche 0.24.4 is the earliest version containing the fix for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cloudflare, Inc.
Product-quichequiche
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-35915
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.40% / 59.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 21:05
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unbounded gas consumption in @openzeppelin/contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The target contract of an EIP-165 `supportsInterface` query can cause unbounded gas consumption by returning a lot of data, while it is generally assumed that this operation has a bounded cost. The issue has been fixed in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openzeppelinOpenZeppelin
Product-contractsopenzeppelin-ethcontracts_upgradeableopenzeppelin-solidityopenzeppelin-contracts
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-4432
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 35.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 May, 2025 | 16:06
Updated-25 Jul, 2025 | 05:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ring: some aes functions may panic when overflow checking is enabled in ring

A flaw was found in Rust's Ring package. A panic may be triggered when overflow checking is enabled. In the QUIC protocol, this flaw allows an attacker to induce this panic by sending a specially crafted packet. It will likely occur unintentionally in 1 out of every 2**32 packets sent or received.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Satellite 6
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-34439
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Oct, 2022 | 18:05
Updated-07 May, 2025 | 14:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.0.x-9.4.0.x contain allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service and performance issue on that node.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_powerscale_onefsPowerScale OneFS
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-33749
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Xen Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Xen Project
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 08:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

XAPI open file limit DoS It is possible for an unauthenticated client on the network to cause XAPI to hit its file-descriptor limit. This causes XAPI to be unable to accept new requests for other (trusted) clients, and blocks XAPI from carrying out any tasks that require the opening of file descriptors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-XapiXen Project
Product-xapiXapi
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-41717
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Dec, 2022 | 19:03
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive memory growth in net/http and golang.org/x/net/http2

An attacker can cause excessive memory growth in a Go server accepting HTTP/2 requests. HTTP/2 server connections contain a cache of HTTP header keys sent by the client. While the total number of entries in this cache is capped, an attacker sending very large keys can cause the server to allocate approximately 64 MiB per open connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard librarygolang.org/x/netFedora ProjectGo
Product-gofedorahttp2golang.org/x/net/http2net/http
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found