A vulnerability was found in Exit Strategy Plugin 1.55 on WordPress and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function exitpageadmin of the file exitpage.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.59 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as d964b8e961b2634158719f3328f16eda16ce93ac. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-225266 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in E4J s.R.L. VikBooking Hotel Booking Engine & PMS plugin <= 1.6.1 versions.

An attacker could send a malicious link to an authenticated operator, which may allow remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of the user on the Sunny WebBox Firmware Version 1.6 and prior. This device uses IP addresses to maintain communication after a successful login, which would increase the ease of exploitation.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Himanshu Parashar Google Site Verification plugin using Meta Tag.This issue affects Google Site Verification plugin using Meta Tag: from n/a through 1.2.

The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability resend an email to an arbitrary address (for example a password reset email could be resent to an attacker controlled email, and allow them to take over an account).

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.4, and 12.0.0 is vulnerable to form action hijacking where it is possible to modify the form action to reference an arbitrary path. IBM X-Force ID: 255898.

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V2.0 SP1). Some parts of the web application are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker that is able to trigger requests of a logged-in user to the application. The vulnerability could allow switching the connectivity state of a user or a device. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

In OSIsoft PI Web API and prior, the affected product is vulnerable to a direct attack due to a cross-site request forgery protection setting that has not taken effect.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stiofan UsersWP userswp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects UsersWP: from n/a through <= 1.2.53.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in xtemos WoodMart - Multipurpose WooCommerce Theme <= 7.1.1 versions.

All versions of @fastify/oauth2 used a statically generated state parameter at startup time and were used across all requests for all users. The purpose of the Oauth2 state parameter is to prevent Cross-Site-Request-Forgery attacks. As such, it should be unique per user and should be connected to the user's session in some way that will allow the server to validate it. v7.2.0 changes the default behavior to store the state in a cookie with the http-only and same-site=lax attributes set. The state is now by default generated for every user. Note that this contains a breaking change in the checkStateFunction function, which now accepts the full Request object.

D-Link DIR-655 C devices before 3.02B05 BETA03 allow CSRF for the entire management console.

index.php/admin/permissions in Ignited CMS through 2017-02-19 allows CSRF to add an administrator.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arul Prasad J Publish Confirm Message plugin <= 1.3.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BRANDbrilliance Post State Tags plugin <= 2.0.6 versions.

The Apptivo Business Site CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'awp_ip_deny' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to block IP addresses via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sybre Waaijer Pro Mime Types – Manage file media types plugin <= 1.0.7 versions.

SolarWinds Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) Web client before 15.1.6 Hotfix 2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the file upload functionality via ?Command=Upload with the Dir and File parameters.

The CAPTCHA 4WP WordPress plugin before 7.1.0 lets user input reach a sensitive require_once call in one of its admin-side templates. This can be abused by attackers, via a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack to run arbitrary code on the server.

The Houzez Property Feed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the "deleteexport" action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete property feed exports via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Steinbrecher WP BrowserUpdate plugin <= 4.4.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ReCorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS plugin <= 2.1.9 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token bypass was identified in PRTG 23.2.84.1566 and earlier versions that allows remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. This could force PRTG to execute different actions, such as creating new users. The severity of this vulnerability is high and received a score of 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

icingaweb2-module-jira provides integration with Atlassian Jira. Starting in version 1.3.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, template and field configuration forms perform the deletion action before user input is validated, including the cross site request forgery token. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2. There are no known workarounds.

The Page Builder by AZEXO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.27.133. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'azh_add_post', 'azh_duplicate_post', 'azh_update_post' and 'azh_remove_post' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, modify, and delete a post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Page Builder by AZEXO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.27.133. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'azh_save' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the post content and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

On the D-Link DIR-615 before v20.12PTb04, if a victim logged in to the Router's Web Interface visits a malicious site from another Browser tab, the malicious site then can send requests to the victim's Router without knowing the credentials (CSRF). An attacker can host a page that sends a POST request to Form2File.htm that tries to upload Firmware to victim's Router. This causes the router to reboot/crash resulting in Denial of Service. An attacker may succeed in uploading malicious Firmware.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chronosly Chronosly Events Calendar plugin <= 2.6.2 versions.

CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin.

Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior lack CSRF protections for state-changing actions in the administrative interface. An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into performing unauthorized configuration changes.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in uPress Enable Accessibility plugin <= 1.4 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomSky JS Job Manager plugin <= 2.0.0 versions.

Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 387.v938a_ecb_f7fe9 and earlier does not require POST requests for an HTTP endpoint, allowing attackers to reindex the database.

The Voo branded NETGEAR CG3700b custom firmware V2.02.03 allows CSRF against all /goform/ URIs. An attacker can modify all settings including WEP/WPA/WPA2 keys, restore the router to factory settings, or even upload an entire malicious configuration file.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Faraz Quazi Floating Action Button plugin <= 1.2.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kilian Evang Ultimate Noindex Nofollow Tool II plugin <= 1.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Benic Simple Giveaways – Grow your business, email lists and traffic with contests plugin <= 2.46.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database plugin <= 2.4.9 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arshid Easy Hide Login.This issue affects Easy Hide Login: from n/a through 1.0.8.

The WP Image Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gky_image_uploader_main_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Simple:Press Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.10.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sp_save_edited_post' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify a forum post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

In SilverStripe through 4.3.3, the previous fix for SS-2018-007 does not completely mitigate the risk of CSRF in GraphQL mutations,

PlaciPy is a placement management system designed for educational institutions. In version 1.0.0, the application enables credentialed CORS requests but does not implement any CSRF protection mechanism.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themelooks Enter Addons enteraddons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enter Addons: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.

The WebDorado Contact Form Builder plugin before 1.0.69 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST['action'] value and the $_GET['action'] value, and the latter is unsanitized.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Moose Kenta Companion kenta-companion allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kenta Companion: from n/a through <= 1.3.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpzita Zita Elementor Site Library zita-site-library allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zita Elementor Site Library: from n/a through <= 1.6.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themastercut Revision Manager TMC revision-manager-tmc allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Revision Manager TMC: from n/a through <= 2.8.22.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ultimate Member plugin <= 2.6.0 versions.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in EyouCMS v1.6.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a supplying a crafted HTML file to the Upload software format function.