Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-25153

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-30 Jan, 2026 | 21:31
Updated At-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected At-
Credits

@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via MkDocs hooks

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node provides common node.js functionalities for TechDocs. In versions of @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node prior to 1.13.11 and 1.14.1, when TechDocs is configured with `runIn: local`, a malicious actor who can submit or modify a repository's `mkdocs.yml` file can execute arbitrary Python code on the TechDocs build server via MkDocs hooks configuration. @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node versions 1.13.11 and 1.14.1 contain a fix. The fix introduces an allowlist of supported MkDocs configuration keys. Unsupported configuration keys (including `hooks`) are now removed from `mkdocs.yml` before running the generator, with a warning logged to indicate which keys were removed. Users of `@techdocs/cli` should also upgrade to the latest version, which includes the fixed `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` dependency. Some workarounds are available. Configure TechDocs with `runIn: docker` instead of `runIn: local` to provide container isolation, though it does not fully mitigate the risk. Limit who can modify `mkdocs.yml` files in repositories that TechDocs processes; only allow trusted contributors. Implement PR review requirements for changes to `mkdocs.yml` files to detect malicious `hooks` configurations before they are merged. Use MkDocs < 1.4.0 (e.g., 1.3.1) which does not support hooks. Note: This may limit access to newer MkDocs features. Building documentation in CI/CD pipelines using `@techdocs/cli` does not mitigate this vulnerability, as the CLI uses the same vulnerable `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` package.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:30 Jan, 2026 | 21:31
Updated At:30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via MkDocs hooks

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node provides common node.js functionalities for TechDocs. In versions of @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node prior to 1.13.11 and 1.14.1, when TechDocs is configured with `runIn: local`, a malicious actor who can submit or modify a repository's `mkdocs.yml` file can execute arbitrary Python code on the TechDocs build server via MkDocs hooks configuration. @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node versions 1.13.11 and 1.14.1 contain a fix. The fix introduces an allowlist of supported MkDocs configuration keys. Unsupported configuration keys (including `hooks`) are now removed from `mkdocs.yml` before running the generator, with a warning logged to indicate which keys were removed. Users of `@techdocs/cli` should also upgrade to the latest version, which includes the fixed `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` dependency. Some workarounds are available. Configure TechDocs with `runIn: docker` instead of `runIn: local` to provide container isolation, though it does not fully mitigate the risk. Limit who can modify `mkdocs.yml` files in repositories that TechDocs processes; only allow trusted contributors. Implement PR review requirements for changes to `mkdocs.yml` files to detect malicious `hooks` configurations before they are merged. Use MkDocs < 1.4.0 (e.g., 1.3.1) which does not support hooks. Note: This may limit access to newer MkDocs features. Building documentation in CI/CD pipelines using `@techdocs/cli` does not mitigate this vulnerability, as the CLI uses the same vulnerable `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` package.

Affected Products
Vendor
backstage
Product
backstage
Versions
Affected
  • < 1.13.11
  • = 1.14.0
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-94CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-94
Description: CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.7HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.7
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-6jr7-99pf-8vgf
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-6jr7-99pf-8vgf
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node: @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via MkDocs hooks

A code injection flaw has been discovered in the npm @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node library. When TechDocs is configured with `runIn: local`, a malicious actor who can submit or modify a repository's `mkdocs.yml` file can execute arbitrary Python code on the TechDocs build server via MkDocs hooks configuration.

Affected Products
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9
Default Status
affected
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9
Default Status
affected
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Self-service automation portal 2
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2
Default Status
affected
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-94
Description: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.7HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.7
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Metrics Other Info
Red Hat severity rating
value:
Important
namespace:
https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

RHSA-2026:6174: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8

RHSA-2026:6802: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9

Configurations

Workarounds

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Reported to Red Hat.2026-01-30 22:00:57
Made public.2026-01-30 21:31:58
Event: Reported to Red Hat.
Date: 2026-01-30 22:00:57
Event: Made public.
Date: 2026-01-30 21:31:58
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25153
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435576
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-25153.json
x_sadp-csaf-vex
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6174
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6802
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25153
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435576
Resource:
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-25153.json
Resource:
x_sadp-csaf-vex
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6174
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6802
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:30 Jan, 2026 | 22:15
Updated At:30 Jun, 2026 | 03:17

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node provides common node.js functionalities for TechDocs. In versions of @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node prior to 1.13.11 and 1.14.1, when TechDocs is configured with `runIn: local`, a malicious actor who can submit or modify a repository's `mkdocs.yml` file can execute arbitrary Python code on the TechDocs build server via MkDocs hooks configuration. @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node versions 1.13.11 and 1.14.1 contain a fix. The fix introduces an allowlist of supported MkDocs configuration keys. Unsupported configuration keys (including `hooks`) are now removed from `mkdocs.yml` before running the generator, with a warning logged to indicate which keys were removed. Users of `@techdocs/cli` should also upgrade to the latest version, which includes the fixed `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` dependency. Some workarounds are available. Configure TechDocs with `runIn: docker` instead of `runIn: local` to provide container isolation, though it does not fully mitigate the risk. Limit who can modify `mkdocs.yml` files in repositories that TechDocs processes; only allow trusted contributors. Implement PR review requirements for changes to `mkdocs.yml` files to detect malicious `hooks` configurations before they are merged. Use MkDocs < 1.4.0 (e.g., 1.3.1) which does not support hooks. Note: This may limit access to newer MkDocs features. Building documentation in CI/CD pipelines using `@techdocs/cli` does not mitigate this vulnerability, as the CLI uses the same vulnerable `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` package.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.7HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Primary3.18.8HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Secondary3.17.7HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
N/A
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.7
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.8
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.7
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Type: N/A
Version:
Base score:
Base severity: N/A
Vector:
CPE Matches

The Linux Foundation
linuxfoundation
>>backstage>>Versions before 1.13.11(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:backstage:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
The Linux Foundation
linuxfoundation
>>backstage>>Versions from 1.14.0(inclusive) to 1.14.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:backstage:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-94Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-94Secondary0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
CWE ID: CWE-94
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-94
Type: Secondary
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-6jr7-99pf-8vgfsecurity-advisories@github.com
Vendor Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61740b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68020b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-251530b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=24355760b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-25153.json0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-6jr7-99pf-8vgf
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6174
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6802
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25153
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435576
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-25153.json
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

618Records found

CVE-2025-14287
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-1.46% / 70.31%
||
7 Day CHG+0.22%
Published-15 Mar, 2026 | 09:27
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow

A command injection vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow versions before v3.7.0, specifically in the `mlflow/sagemaker/__init__.py` file at lines 161-167. The vulnerability arises from the direct interpolation of user-supplied container image names into shell commands without proper sanitization, which are then executed using `os.system()`. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by supplying malicious input through the `--container` parameter of the CLI. The issue affects environments where MLflow is used, including development setups, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud deployments.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lfprojectsmlflowRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mlflowmlflow/mlflowRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-14576
Matching Score-6
Assigner-The Qt Company
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-The Qt Company
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Apr, 2026 | 12:39
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Possible QML code injection in VectorImage component

Insufficient validation of node IDs in Qt SVG module allows arbitrary QML/JavaScript code injection when loading malicious SVG files through the VectorImage component in Qt Quick. While QML execution is typically more restricted than native code execution, this could still lead to denial of service, information disclosure, or other impacts depending on the application's privilege level and data access.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qtThe Qt CompanyRed Hat, Inc.
Product-qtdeclarativeQtMulticluster Global HubRed Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat Enterprise Linux CodeReady Linux Builder (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2024-6655
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jul, 2024 | 15:05
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gtk3: gtk2: library injection from cwd

A flaw was found in the GTK library. Under certain conditions, it is possible for a library to be injected into a GTK application from the current working directory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2011-2964
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-4.96% / 91.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jul, 2011 | 20:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

foomaticrip.c in foomatic-rip in foomatic-filters in Foomatic 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted *FoomaticRIPCommandLine field in a .ppd file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-2697.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Linux Foundation
Product-foomaticn/a
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-24781
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.16% / 63.15%
||
7 Day CHG+0.17%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:33
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Breakout Through Inspect

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to version 3.11.0, VM2 suffers from a sandbox breakout vulnerability through the inspect function. This allows attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system. This issue has been patched in version 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-693
Protection Mechanism Failure
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2019-14867
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-6.33% / 92.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Nov, 2019 | 08:05
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in IPA, all 4.6.x versions before 4.6.7, all 4.7.x versions before 4.7.4 and all 4.8.x versions before 4.8.3, in the way the internal function ber_scanf() was used in some components of the IPA server, which parsed kerberos key data. An unauthenticated attacker who could trigger parsing of the krb principal key could cause the IPA server to crash or in some conditions, cause arbitrary code to be executed on the server hosting the IPA server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-freeipaRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-freeipafedoraipa
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2024-24421
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.93% / 56.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jan, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-03 Jul, 2025 | 00:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A type confusion in the nas_message_decode function of Magma <= 1.8.0 (fixed in v1.9 commit 08472ba98b8321f802e95f5622fa90fec2dea486) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted NAS packet.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Linux Foundation
Product-magman/a
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-52860
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.90%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 18:33
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via Python Omni-Completion

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to version 9.2.0597, Vim's Python omni-completion executes reconstructed function and class definitions from the current buffer with exec() as part of populating the completion dictionary. Python evaluates function default values, parameter annotations, and class base expressions at definition time, so a hostile buffer can execute attacker-controlled Python expressions during omni-completion. The existing g:pythoncomplete_allow_import mitigation (GHSA-52mc-rq6p-rc7c) does not cover this path, because the attacker-controlled code is not a harvested import/from statement. This issue has been patched in version 9.2.0597.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VimRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vimvimRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-4800
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-1.74% / 74.90%
||
7 Day CHG+0.71%
Published-31 Mar, 2026 | 19:25
Updated-03 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names

Impact: The fix for CVE-2021-23337 (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink. When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time. Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function(). Patches: Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0. Workarounds: Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lodashlodashRed Hat, Inc.
Product-lodash-eslodashlodash-amdlodash.templatelodash-eslodashlodash-amdlodash.templateRed Hat Developer Hub 1.8Red Hat Directory Server 13Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 10)Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.6)Red Hat Quay 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux HighAvailability EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.4)Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18Red Hat Directory Server 11Red Hat Directory Server 12Red Hat Developer HubMulticluster Engine for KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5Red Hat Build of Podman DesktopRed Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat Discovery 2Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 9)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16Gatekeeper 3Migration Toolkit for ContainersRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Node HealthCheck OperatorRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux ResilientStorage E4S (v.9.0)Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.2)Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9OpenShift LightspeedRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Build of KeycloakRed Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)Red Hat Satellite 6.18OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.2Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.0)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.6)Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability AUS (v.8.4)Confidential Compute AttestationRed Hat Edge Manager 1Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 9)Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.6)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Connectivity Link 1Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2023-6395
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.55% / 72.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jan, 2024 | 14:33
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Mock: privilege escalation for users that can access mock configuration

The Mock software contains a vulnerability wherein an attacker could potentially exploit privilege escalation, enabling the execution of arbitrary code with root user privileges. This weakness stems from the absence of proper sandboxing during the expansion and execution of Jinja2 templates, which may be included in certain configuration parameters. While the Mock documentation advises treating users added to the mock group as privileged, certain build systems invoking mock on behalf of users might inadvertently permit less privileged users to define configuration tags. These tags could then be passed as parameters to mock during execution, potentially leading to the utilization of Jinja2 templates for remote privilege escalation and the execution of arbitrary code as the root user on the build server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rpm-software-managementn/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-mockextra_packages_for_enterprise_linuxfedoraRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6Extra Packages for Enterprise LinuxmockFedora
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-48962
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.91%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-27 May, 2026 | 03:12
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IO::Compress versions before 2.220 for Perl can execute arbitrary code in File::GlobMapper via an attacker-controlled output glob

IO::Compress versions before 2.220 for Perl can execute arbitrary code in File::GlobMapper via an attacker-controlled output glob. _parseOutputGlob() wraps the caller-supplied output glob string in double quotes and stores it in the parser state; _getFiles() then runs the stored expression through eval STRING. A literal double quote in the output glob closes the dquote wrapper, and the characters that follow are evaluated as Perl. Arbitrary Perl in the output glob executes at the calling process's privilege.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-PMQSRed Hat, Inc.
Product-IO::CompressRed Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS AUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS AUS (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS EUS EXTENSION (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2026-47162
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.29%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 18:32
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vim: Vimscript Code Injection in netrw NetrwBookHistSave() via crafted directory name

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to version 9.2.0495, a Vimscript code injection vulnerability exists in s:NetrwBookHistSave() in the netrw plugin (runtime/pack/dist/opt/netrw/autoload/netrw.vim) when serializing browsed directory paths to the history file ~/.vim/.netrwhist. A directory name derived from the filesystem is interpolated into a single-quoted Vimscript string literal without escaping embedded single quotes, allowing a crafted directory name to break out of the string context and execute arbitrary Vimscript, including shell commands via system() and :!, the next time the history file is sourced. This issue has been patched in version 9.2.0495.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VimRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vimvimRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-140
Improper Neutralization of Delimiters
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-45829
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-12.39% / 95.71%
||
7 Day CHG+2.12%
Published-18 May, 2026 | 15:59
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 12:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A pre-authentication, code injection vulnerability in version 1.0.0 or later of the ChromaDB Python project allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary code on the server by sending a malicious model repository and trust_remote_code set to true in the /api/v2/tenants/{tenant}/databases/{db}/collections endpoint.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ChromaRed Hat, Inc.
Product-ChromaDBRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-43997
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.98% / 57.78%
||
7 Day CHG+0.24%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:17
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, it is possible to obtain the host Object. There are various ways to use the host Object, to escape the sandbox, one example would be using HostObject.getOwnPropertySymbols to obtain Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom). This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44005
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.84% / 53.42%
||
7 Day CHG+0.28%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:40
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. From 3.9.6 to 3.10.5, vm2's bridge exposes mutable proxies for real host-realm intrinsic prototypes and then forwards sandbox writes into the underlying host objects with otherReflectSet() and otherReflectDefineProperty(), which lets attacker-controlled JavaScript running in a default VM or inherited NodeVM mutate shared host Object.prototype, Array.prototype, and Function.prototype from inside the sandbox This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-1321
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44006
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.81% / 52.61%
||
7 Day CHG+0.22%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:31
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, It is possible to reach BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf, which can be used to get arbitrary prototypes. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-914
Improper Control of Dynamically-Identified Variables
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44513
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.86% / 54.21%
||
7 Day CHG+0.18%
Published-14 May, 2026 | 16:26
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Diffusers: `trust_remote_code` bypass via `custom_pipeline` and local custom components

Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, a trust_remote_code bypass in DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained allows arbitrary remote code execution despite the user passing trust_remote_code=False (or omitting it, which is the default). The vulnerability has three variants, all sharing the same root cause — the trust_remote_code gate was implemented inside DiffusionPipeline.download() rather than at the actual dynamic-module load site, so any code path that bypassed or short-circuited download() also bypassed the security check. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('repoA', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the gate evaluated against repoA's file list rather than repoB's, so repoB's pipeline.py was loaded and executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the local-path branch never invoked download(), so the gate was never reached and remote code from repoB executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', trust_remote_code=False) where the snapshot contains custom component files (e.g. unet/my_unet_model.py) referenced from model_index.json — same root cause; the local path skipped download() and custom component code executed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.38.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-huggingfacehuggingfaceRed Hat, Inc.
Product-diffusersdiffusersRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44495
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 38.84%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 15:33
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Axios: Credential Theft and Response Hijacking via Prototype Pollution Gadget in Config Merge

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axiosRed Hat, Inc.
Product-axiosRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat Quay 3OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.14Network Observability OperatorRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10Red Hat Fuse 7Gatekeeper 3Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13Migration Toolkit for ContainersRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerOpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Cryostat 4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-1321
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44016
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 30.40%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-24 Jun, 2026 | 17:42
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Docling: Unsafe Playwright-based HTML Rendering

Docling simplifies document processing by parsing diverse formats and providing integrations with the generative AI ecosystem. FIn versions >= 2.82.0, < 2.91.0, if the HTML backend was explicitly configured for rendering (rendering option by default deactivated), then the Playwright-based rendering feature could allow JavaScript execution and unrestricted network access when processing untrusted HTML documents. An attacker could craft malicious HTML that executes arbitrary JavaScript in the rendering context or makes unauthorized network requests to internal services, potentially leading to SSRF attacks, data exfiltration, or remote code execution in the rendering environment. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.91.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-doclingdocling-projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-doclingdoclingRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2023-35926
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-1.89% / 77.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2023 | 13:29
Updated-05 Dec, 2024 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure sandbox in Backstage Scaffolder plugin

Backstage is an open platform for building developer portals. The Backstage scaffolder-backend plugin uses a templating library that requires sandbox, as it by design allows for code injection. The library used for this sandbox so far has been `vm2`, but in light of several past vulnerabilities and existing vulnerabilities that may not have a fix, the plugin has switched to using a different sandbox library. A malicious actor with write access to a registered scaffolder template could manipulate the template in a way that allows for remote code execution on the scaffolder-backend instance. This was only exploitable in the template YAML definition itself and not by user input data. This is vulnerability is fixed in version 1.15.0 of `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend`.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-backstageThe Linux Foundation
Product-backstagebackstage
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41179
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-9.20% / 94.71%
||
7 Day CHG+0.82%
Published-23 Apr, 2026 | 00:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RClone: Unauthenticated operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution

Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint `operations/fsinfo` is exposed without `AuthRequired: true` and accepts attacker-controlled `fs` input. Because `rc.GetFs(...)` supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, `bearer_token_command` is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication. Version 1.73.5 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rclonercloneRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rclonercloneRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2OpenShift API for Data Protection
CWE ID-CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41246
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 38.04%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-23 Apr, 2026 | 18:44
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Contour: Lua code injection via Cookie Path Rewrite Policy

Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. From v1.19.0 to before v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6, Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature is vulnerable to Lua code injection. An attacker with RBAC permissions to create or modify HTTPProxy resources can craft a malicious value in spec.routes[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value or spec.routes[].services[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value that results in arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. The cookie rewriting feature is internally implemented using Envoy's HTTP Lua filter. User-controlled values are interpolated into Lua source code using Go text/template without sufficient sanitization. The injected code only executes when processing traffic on the attacker's own route, which they already control. However, since Envoy runs as shared infrastructure, the injected code can also read Envoy's xDS client credentials from the filesystem or cause denial of service for other tenants sharing the Envoy instance. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-projectcontourprojectcontourRed Hat, Inc.
Product-contourcontourExternalDNS Operator
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41523
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.84%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-22 Jun, 2026 | 22:18
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vLLM: Security Check Bypass via assert Statement in Activation Function Loading Allows Arbitrary Code Execution

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, an assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vllmvllm-projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vllmvllmRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-35093
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 8.19%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-01 Apr, 2026 | 13:54
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Libinput: libinput: unauthorized code execution and information disclosure through lua bytecode plugins

A flaw was found in libinput. A local attacker who can place a specially crafted Lua bytecode file in certain system or user configuration directories can bypass security restrictions. This allows the attacker to run unauthorized code with the same permissions as the program using libinput, such as a graphical compositor. This could lead to the attacker monitoring keyboard input and sending that information to an external location.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectRed Hat, Inc.freedesktop.org
Product-libinputfedoraRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-35171
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.71% / 49.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2026 | 17:45
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 15:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious Logging Configuration in Kedro

Kedro is a toolbox for production-ready data science. Prior to 1.3.0, Kedro allows the logging configuration file path to be set via the KEDRO_LOGGING_CONFIG environment variable and loads it without validation. The logging configuration schema supports the special () key, which enables arbitrary callable instantiation. An attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary system commands during application startup. This is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability caused by unsafe use of logging.config.dictConfig() with user-controlled input. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kedro-orgThe Linux Foundation
Product-kedrokedro
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33937
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.78% / 75.55%
||
7 Day CHG+0.49%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:03
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, `Handlebars.compile()` accepts a pre-parsed AST object in addition to a template string. The `value` field of a `NumberLiteral` AST node is emitted directly into the generated JavaScript without quoting or sanitization. An attacker who can supply a crafted AST to `compile()` can therefore inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript, leading to Remote Code Execution on the server. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Validate input type before calling `Handlebars.compile()`; ensure the argument is always a `string`, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value. Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time; `compile()` will be unavailable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33938
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 48.97%
||
7 Day CHG+0.09%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:05
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion by tampering @partial-block

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, the `@partial-block` special variable is stored in the template data context and is reachable and mutable from within a template via helpers that accept arbitrary objects. When a helper overwrites `@partial-block` with a crafted Handlebars AST, a subsequent invocation of `{{> @partial-block}}` compiles and executes that AST, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution on the server. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, use the runtime-only build (`require('handlebars/runtime')`). The `compile()` method is absent, eliminating the vulnerable fallback path. Second, audit registered helpers for any that write arbitrary values to context objects. Helpers should treat context data as read-only. Third, avoid registering helpers from third-party packages (such as `handlebars-helpers`) in contexts where templates or context data can be influenced by untrusted input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33940
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.70% / 48.76%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:11
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion when passing an object as dynamic partial

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, a crafted object placed in the template context can bypass all conditional guards in `resolvePartial()` and cause `invokePartial()` to return `undefined`. The Handlebars runtime then treats the unresolved partial as a source that needs to be compiled, passing the crafted object to `env.compile()`. Because the object is a valid Handlebars AST containing injected code, the generated JavaScript executes arbitrary commands on the server. The attack requires the adversary to control a value that can be returned by a dynamic partial lookup. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, use the runtime-only build (`require('handlebars/runtime')`). Without `compile()`, the fallback compilation path in `invokePartial` is unreachable. Second, sanitize context data before rendering: Ensure no value in the context is a non-primitive object that could be passed to a dynamic partial. Third, avoid dynamic partial lookups (`{{> (lookup ...)}}`) when context data is user-controlled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33941
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.84%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:13
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection in CLI Precompiler via Unescaped Names and Options

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, the Handlebars CLI precompiler (`bin/handlebars` / `lib/precompiler.js`) concatenates user-controlled strings — template file names and several CLI options — directly into the JavaScript it emits, without any escaping or sanitization. An attacker who can influence template filenames or CLI arguments can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when the generated bundle is loaded in Node.js or a browser. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, validate all CLI inputs before invoking the precompiler. Reject filenames and option values that contain characters with JavaScript string-escaping significance (`"`, `'`, `;`, etc.). Second, use a fixed, trusted namespace string passed via a configuration file rather than command-line arguments in automated pipelines. Third, run the precompiler in a sandboxed environment (container with no write access to sensitive paths) to limit the impact of successful exploitation. Fourth, audit template filenames in any repository or package that is consumed by an automated build pipeline.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33943
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 51.71%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:15
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Happy DOM ECMAScriptModuleCompiler: unsanitized export names are interpolated as executable code

Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. In versions 15.10.0 through 20.8.7, a code injection vulnerability in `ECMAScriptModuleCompiler` allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by injecting arbitrary JavaScript expressions inside `export { }` declarations in ES module scripts processed by happy-dom. The compiler directly interpolates unsanitized content into generated code as an executable expression, and the quote filter does not strip backticks, allowing template literal-based payloads to bypass sanitization. Version 20.8.8 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-capricorn86capricorn86Red Hat, Inc.
Product-happy_domhappy-domRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-32640
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 39.87%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-13 Mar, 2026 | 21:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
(SimpleEval) Objects (including modules) can leak dangerous modules through to direct access inside the sandbox.

SimpleEval is a library for adding evaluatable expressions into python projects. Prior to 1.0.5, objects (including modules) can leak dangerous modules through to direct access inside the sandbox. If the objects you've passed in as names to SimpleEval have modules or other disallowed / dangerous objects available as attrs. Additionally, dangerous functions or modules could be accessed by passing them as callbacks to other safe functions to call. The latest version 1.0.5 has this issue fixed. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-danthedeckiedanthedeckieRed Hat, Inc.
Product-simpleevalsimpleevalRed Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2021-47952
Matching Score-6
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.70% / 48.49%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-16 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-27 Jun, 2026 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
python jsonpickle 2.0.0 Remote Code Execution via py/repr

python jsonpickle 2.0.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary Python commands by deserializing malicious JSON payloads containing py/repr objects. Attackers can craft JSON strings with py/repr directives that invoke the eval function during deserialization to execute arbitrary code.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JsonpickleRed Hat, Inc.
Product-python jsonpickleRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33414
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.61% / 44.73%
||
7 Day CHG+0.10%
Published-14 Apr, 2026 | 22:42
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PowerShell Command Injection in Podman HyperV Machine

Podman is a tool for managing OCI containers and pods. Versions 4.8.0 through 5.8.1 contain a command injection vulnerability in the HyperV machine backend in pkg/machine/hyperv/stubber.go, where the VM image path is inserted into a PowerShell double-quoted string without sanitization, allowing $() subexpression injection. Because PowerShell evaluates subexpressions inside double-quoted strings before executing the outer command, an attacker who can control the VM image path through a crafted machine name or image directory can execute arbitrary PowerShell commands with the privileges of the Podman process. On typical Windows installations this means SYSTEM-level code execution, and only Windows is affected as the code is exclusive to the HyperV backend. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-podman_projectcontainersMicrosoft CorporationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-windowspodmanpodmanRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-32613
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.55% / 42.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Apr, 2026 | 20:07
Updated-23 Apr, 2026 | 18:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Spinnaker vulnerable to RCE via expression parsing due to unrestricted context handling

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Echo like some other services, uses SPeL (Spring Expression Language) to process information - specifically around expected artifacts. In versions prior to 2026.1.0, 2026.0.1, 2025.4.2, and 2025.3.2, unlike orca, it was NOT restricting that context to a set of trusted classes, but allowing FULL JVM access. This enabled a user to use arbitrary java classes which allow deep access to the system. This enabled the ability to invoke commands, access files, etc. Versions 2026.1.0, 2026.0.1, 2025.4.2, and 2025.3.2 contain a patch. As a workaround, disable echo entirely.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-spinnakerThe Linux Foundation
Product-spinnakerspinnaker
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-32304
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.57% / 43.07%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-12 Mar, 2026 | 21:24
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Locutus: RCE via unsanitized input in create_function()

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Prior to 3.0.14, the create_function(args, code) function passes both parameters directly to the Function constructor without any sanitization, allowing arbitrary code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2026-29091 which was call_user_func_array using eval() in v2.x. This finding affects create_function using new Function() in v3.x. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.14.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-locutuslocutusjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-locutuslocutusLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-88
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-31898
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 27.63%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-18 Mar, 2026 | 03:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
jsPDF has a PDF Object Injection via FreeText color

jsPDF is a library to generate PDFs in JavaScript. Prior to version 4.2.1, user control of arguments of the `createAnnotation` method allows users to inject arbitrary PDF objects, such as JavaScript actions. If given the possibility to pass unsanitized input to the following method, a user can inject arbitrary PDF objects, such as JavaScript actions, which might trigger when the PDF is opened or interacted with the `createAnnotation`: `color` parameter. The vulnerability has been fixed in jsPDF@4.2.1. As a workaround, sanitize user input before passing it to the vulnerable API members.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parallparallaxRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jspdfjsPDFRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-29091
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 51.65%
||
7 Day CHG+0.16%
Published-06 Mar, 2026 | 17:48
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Locutus: Remote Code Execution (RCE) in locutus call_user_func_array due to Code Injection

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Prior to version 3.0.0, a remote code execution (RCE) flaw was discovered in the locutus project, specifically within the call_user_func_array function implementation. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into the application's runtime environment. This issue stems from an insecure implementation of the call_user_func_array function (and its wrapper call_user_func), which fails to properly validate all components of a callback array before passing them to eval(). This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-locutuslocutusjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-locutuslocutusLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2026-31236
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.33% / 24.57%
||
7 Day CHG-0.18%
Published-12 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line argument. This argument is intended to allow users to provide custom Python function definitions. However, the tool directly executes the provided code using the unsafe exec() function without any sanitization, sandboxing, or security restrictions. An attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious llm command with arbitrary Python code in the --functions argument and using social engineering to trick a victim into running it. This leads to arbitrary code execution on the victim's system, potentially granting the attacker full control.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-27830
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.9||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 41.15%
||
7 Day CHG+0.23%
Published-26 Feb, 2026 | 00:45
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
c3p0 vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via unsafe deserialization of userOverridesAsString property

c3p0, a JDBC Connection pooling library, is vulnerable to attack via maliciously crafted Java-serialized objects and `javax.naming.Reference` instances. Several c3p0 `ConnectionPoolDataSource` implementations have a property called `userOverridesAsString` which conceptually represents a `Map<String,Map<String,String>>`. Prior to v0.12.0, that property was maintained as a hex-encoded serialized object. Any attacker able to reset this property, on an existing `ConnectionPoolDataSource` or via maliciously crafted serialized objects or `javax.naming.Reference` instances could be tailored execute unexpected code on the application's `CLASSPATH`. The danger of this vulnerability was strongly magnified by vulnerabilities in c3p0's main dependency, mchange-commons-java. This library includes code that mirrors early implementations of JNDI functionality, including ungated support for remote `factoryClassLocation` values. Attackers could set c3p0's `userOverridesAsString` hex-encoded serialized objects that include objects "indirectly serialized" via JNDI references. Deserialization of those objects and dereferencing of the embedded `javax.naming.Reference` objects could provoke download and execution of malicious code from a remote `factoryClassLocation`. Although hazard presented by c3p0's vulnerabilites are exarcerbated by vulnerabilities in mchange-commons-java, use of Java-serialized-object hex as the format for a writable Java-Bean property, of objects that may be exposed across JNDI interfaces, represents a serious independent fragility. The `userOverridesAsString` property of c3p0 `ConnectionPoolDataSource` classes has been reimplemented to use a safe CSV-based format, rather than rely upon potentially dangerous Java object deserialization. c3p0-0.12.0+ and above depend upon mchange-commons-java 0.4.0+, which gates support for remote `factoryClassLocation` values by configuration parameters that default to restrictive values. c3p0 additionally enforces the new mchange-commons-java `com.mchange.v2.naming.nameGuardClassName` to prevent injection of unexpected, potentially remote JNDI names. There is no supported workaround for versions of c3p0 prior to 0.12.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-swaldmanRed Hat, Inc.
Product-c3p0Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat build of Debezium 3Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat build of Debezium 2streams for Apache Kafka 2Red Hat JBoss EAP 8.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.14.4 for Spring Boot 3.5.11Red Hat Build of Debezium 3.2streams for Apache Kafka 3Red Hat JBoss EAP 8.1 for RHEL 8Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2024-9050
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 36.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2024 | 12:14
Updated-26 Jun, 2026 | 00:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Networkmanager-libreswan: local privilege escalation via leftupdown

A flaw was found in the libreswan client plugin for NetworkManager (NetkworkManager-libreswan), where it fails to properly sanitize the VPN configuration from the local unprivileged user. In this configuration, composed by a key-value format, the plugin fails to escape special characters, leading the application to interpret values as keys. One of the most critical parameters that could be abused by a malicious user is the `leftupdown`key. This key takes an executable command as a value and is used to specify what executes as a callback in NetworkManager-libreswan to retrieve configuration settings back to NetworkManager. As NetworkManager uses Polkit to allow an unprivileged user to control the system's network configuration, a malicious actor could achieve local privilege escalation and potential code execution as root in the targeted machine by creating a malicious configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-27876
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Grafana Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Grafana Labs
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.93% / 77.52%
||
7 Day CHG+0.65%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 14:24
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RCE on Grafana via sqlExpressions

A chained attack via SQL Expressions and a Grafana Enterprise plugin can lead to a remote arbitrary code execution impact (RCE). This is enabled by a feature in Grafana (OSS), so all users are always recommended to update to avoid future attack vectors going this path. Only instances with the sqlExpressions feature toggle enabled are vulnerable. Only instances in the following version ranges are affected: - 11.6.0 (inclusive) to 11.6.14 (exclusive): 11.6.14 has the fix. 11.5 and below are not affected. - 12.0.0 (inclusive) to 12.1.10 (exclusive): 12.1.10 has the fix. 12.0 did not receive an update, as it is end-of-life. - 12.2.0 (inclusive) to 12.2.8 (exclusive): 12.2.8 has the fix. - 12.3.0 (inclusive) to 12.3.6 (exclusive): 12.3.6 has the fix. - 12.4.0 (inclusive) to 12.4.2 (exclusive): 12.4.2 has the fix. 13.0.0 and above also have the fix: no v13 release is affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Grafana Labs
Product-grafanaGrafanaRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-26332
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.71% / 49.02%
||
7 Day CHG+0.13%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:35
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to version 3.11.0, SuppressedError allows attackers to escape the sandbox and run arbitrary code. This issue has been patched in version 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-693
Protection Mechanism Failure
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-25755
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.82% / 52.66%
||
7 Day CHG+0.18%
Published-19 Feb, 2026 | 14:41
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
jsPDF has PDF Object Injection via Unsanitized Input in addJS Method

jsPDF is a library to generate PDFs in JavaScript. Prior to 4.2.0, user control of the argument of the `addJS` method allows an attacker to inject arbitrary PDF objects into the generated document. By crafting a payload that escapes the JavaScript string delimiter, an attacker can execute malicious actions or alter the document structure, impacting any user who opens the generated PDF. The vulnerability has been fixed in jspdf@4.2.0. As a workaround, escape parentheses in user-provided JavaScript code before passing them to the `addJS` method.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parallparallaxRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jspdfjsPDFRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-24747
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 48.45%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-27 Jan, 2026 | 21:13
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PyTorch Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Untrusted Checkpoint Files

PyTorch is a Python package that provides tensor computation. Prior to version 2.10.0, a vulnerability in PyTorch's `weights_only` unpickler allows an attacker to craft a malicious checkpoint file (`.pth`) that, when loaded with `torch.load(..., weights_only=True)`, can corrupt memory and potentially lead to arbitrary code execution. Version 2.10.0 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pytorchThe Linux FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-pytorchpytorchRed Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-24118
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.92% / 55.84%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:28
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
VM2 Sandbox Breakout Through __lookupGetter__

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to version 3.11.0, VM2 suffers from a sandbox breakout vulnerability. This allows attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system. This issue has been patched in version 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-693
Protection Mechanism Failure
CWE ID-CWE-749
Exposed Dangerous Method or Function
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-24120
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.90% / 55.16%
||
7 Day CHG+0.16%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:31
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Breakout Through Promise Species

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to version 3.10.5, the fix for CVE-2023-37466 is insufficient and can be circumvented allowing attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system. This issue has been patched in version 3.10.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-693
Protection Mechanism Failure
CWE ID-CWE-807
Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-22807
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 50.00%
||
7 Day CHG+0.19%
Published-21 Jan, 2026 | 21:13
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vLLM affected by RCE via auto_map dynamic module loading during model initialization

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Starting in version 0.10.1 and prior to version 0.14.0, vLLM loads Hugging Face `auto_map` dynamic modules during model resolution without gating on `trust_remote_code`, allowing attacker-controlled Python code in a model repo/path to execute at server startup. An attacker who can influence the model repo/path (local directory or remote Hugging Face repo) can achieve arbitrary code execution on the vLLM host during model load. This happens before any request handling and does not require API access. Version 0.14.0 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vllmvllm-projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vllmvllmRed Hat OpenShift AI 3.4Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2Red Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-1615
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.05% / 60.07%
||
7 Day CHG+0.21%
Published-09 Feb, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 15:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package jsonpath before 1.3.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via unsafe evaluation of user-supplied JSON Path expressions. The library relies on the static-eval module to process JSON Path input, which is not designed to handle untrusted data safely. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a malicious JSON Path expression that, when evaluated, executes arbitrary JavaScript code, leading to Remote Code Execution in Node.js environments or Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in browser contexts. This affects all methods that evaluate JSON Paths against objects, including .query, .nodes, .paths, .value, .parent, and .apply.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jsonpathorg.webjars.npm:jsonpathSelf-service automation portal 2Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Quay 3Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Migration Toolkit for Virtualization
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-69872
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.51% / 39.71%
||
7 Day CHG-0.04%
Published-11 Feb, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-03 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

DiskCache (python-diskcache) through 5.6.3 uses Python pickle for serialization by default. An attacker with write access to the cache directory can achieve arbitrary code execution when a victim application reads from the cache.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-61732
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 37.46%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-05 Feb, 2026 | 03:42
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Potential code smuggling via doc comments in cmd/cgo

A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go toolchainGoRed Hat, Inc.
Product-gocmd/cgoRed Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.6)Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces (RHOSDS) 3.26Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.4)Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • ...
  • 12
  • 13
  • Next
Details not found