Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in OpenX 2.8.11 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) users via admin/agency-user-unlink.php, (2) advertisers via admin/advertiser-delete.php, (3) banners via admin/banner-delete.php, (4) campaigns via admin/campaign-delete.php, (5) channels via admin/channel-delete.php, (6) affiliate websites via admin/affiliate-delete.php, or (7) zones via admin/zone-delete.php.
PHP Scripts Mall Entrepreneur Job Portal Script 3.0.1 has Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Edit Profile feature.
The wp-ultimate-csv-importer plugin before 5.6.1 for WordPress has CSRF.
The contact-form-to-email plugin before 1.2.66 for WordPress has CSRF.
cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bluewrench-video-widget.php in the Blue Wrench Video Widget plugin before 2.0.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that embed arbitrary URLs via the bw_url parameter in the bw-videos page to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by embedding a URL to a JavaScript file.
NETGEAR ReadyNAS devices before 6.9.3 are affected by CSRF.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admBase/login.page in the Admin module in JForum allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the user group permissions of arbitrary users via a groupsSave action.
Google Chrome before 29 sends HTTP Cookie headers without first validating that they have the required character-set restrictions, which allows remote attackers to conduct the equivalent of a persistent Logout CSRF attack via a crafted parameter that forces a web application to set a malformed cookie within an HTTP response.
CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine before 5.2.1.6 allows remote attackers to bypass the Ruby on Rails protect_from_forgery mechanism and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a destructive action in a request.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ZCC page in Novell ZENworks Configuration Management (ZCM) before 11.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
The SourceHttpMessageConverter in Spring MVC in Spring Framework before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0.M1 through 4.0.0.RC1 does not disable external entity resolution, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, and conduct CSRF attacks via crafted XML, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, and a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4152 and CVE-2013-7315.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmd.cgi in Icinga 1.8.5, 1.9.4, 1.10.2, and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for unspecified commands via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by bypassing authentication requirements for CVE-2013-7106.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Axway SecureTransport 5.1 SP2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that upload arbitrary files via a crafted request to api/v1.0/files/.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) 7.1 through 7.2.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC Document Sciences xPression 4.1 SP1 before Patch 47, 4.2 before Patch 26, and 4.5 before Patch 05, as used in Documentum Edition, Enterprise Edition Publish Engine, and Enterprise Edition Compuset Engine, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that perform administrative actions in (1) xAdmin or (2) xDashboard.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ProjectForge before 5.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to (1) web/admin/, (2) web/core/, (3) web/dialog/, (4) web/fibu/, (5) web/mobile/, (6) web/task/, or (7) web/wicket/.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Opsview before 4.4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Operations Orchestration before 9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) discovered in tarteaucitron.js – Cookies legislation & GDPR WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.5.4), vulnerable parameters "tarteaucitronEmail" and "tarteaucitronPass".
In OpenNMS Horizon, versions opennms-1-0-stable through opennms-27.1.0-1; OpenNMS Meridian, versions meridian-foundation-2015.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2019.1.18-1; meridian-foundation-2020.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2020.1.6-1 are vulnerable to CSRF, due to no CSRF protection at `/opennms/admin/userGroupView/users/updateUser`. This flaw allows assigning `ROLE_ADMIN` security role to a normal user. Using this flaw, an attacker can trick the admin user to assign administrator privileges to a normal user by enticing him to click upon an attacker-controlled website.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siemens WinCC (TIA Portal) 11 and 12 before 12 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by leveraging improper configuration of SIMATIC HMI panels by the WinCC product.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TEQneers SEO Enhancements (tq_seo) extension before 5.0.1 for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Solution, as used in Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing and Unified MeetingPlace, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCui45209 and CSCui44674.
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.4.4701, CSRF via attachment upload was possible.
Various Vembu products allow an attacker to execute a (non-blind) http-only Cross Site Request Forgery (Other products or versions of products in this family may be affected too.)
Tweetbot 1.3.3 for Mac, and 2.8.5 for iPad and iPhone, does not require confirmation of (1) follow or (2) favorite actions, which allows remote attackers to automatically force the user to perform undesired actions, as demonstrated via the tweetbot:///follow/ URL.
inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DDSN Interactive cm3 Acora CMS 6.0.6/1a, 6.0.2/1a, 5.5.7/12b, 5.5.0/1b-p1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/update.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify arbitrary user accounts via an edit user action.
ClipperCMS 1.3.3 does not have CSRF protection on its kcfinder file upload (enabled by default). This can be used by an attacker to perform actions for an admin (or any user with the file upload capability). With this vulnerability, one can automatically upload files (by default, it allows html, pdf, xml, zip, and many other file types). A file can be accessed publicly under the "/assets/files" directory.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RiteCMS 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via an edit user action to cms/index.php.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Sharetronix 3.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change configuration settings or (2) create new administrative users via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Cognos Express 9.0 before IFIX 2, 9.5 before IFIX 2, 10.1 before IFIX 2, and 10.2.1 before FP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
WonderCMS before 2.0.3 has CSRF because of lack of a token in an unspecified context.
An issue was discovered in Elefant CMS before 2.0.5. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an account via user/add.
MicroPyramid Django-CRM 0.2 allows CSRF for /users/create/, /users/##/edit/, and /accounts/##/delete/ URIs.
An issue was discovered in QCMS 3.0.1. CSRF exists via the backend/user/admin/add.html URI.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Puppet Enterprise (PE) before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that deleting a (1) report, (2) group, or (3) class or possibly have other unspecified impact.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Global Site Selector (GSS) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuh42164.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/create.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative user via an add user action to index.php.
In Calibre-web, versions 0.6.0 to 0.6.13 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). By luring an authenticated user to click on a link, an attacker can create a new user role with admin privileges and attacker-controlled credentials, allowing them to take over the application.
Passwork On-Premise Edition before 4.6.13 allows CSRF via the groups, password, and history subsystems.
The Formidable Form Builder WordPress plugin before 4.09.05 allows to inject certain HTML Tags like <audio>,<video>,<img>,<a> and<button>.This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exploit a HTML-injection byinjecting a malicous link. The HTML-injection may trick authenticated users to follow the link. If the Link gets clicked, Javascript code can be executed. The vulnerability is due to insufficient sanitization of the "data-frmverify" tag for links in the web-based entry inspection page of affected systems. A successful exploitation incomibantion with CSRF could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. These actions include stealing the users account by changing their password or allowing attackers to submit their own code through an authenticated user resulting in Remote Code Execution. If an authenticated user who is able to edit Wordpress PHP Code in any kind, clicks the malicious link, PHP code can be edited.
Missing protections against Cross-Site Request Forgery in the web application in ZyXEL NSA325 V2 version 4.81 allow attackers to perform state-changing actions via crafted HTTP forms.
The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in user having access to the ticket lists dashboard set an arbitrary filter (stored in their cookies) with an XSS payload in it.
The omniauth-facebook gem 1.4.1 before 1.5.0 does not properly store the session parameter, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via the state parameter.
In the Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0, the process_bulk_action() function in "admin/orange-form-email.php" performs an unprepared SQL query with an unsanitized parameter ($id). Only admin can access the page that invokes the function, but because of lack of CSRF protection, it is actually exploitable and could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts for example
The Core Tweaks WP Setup WordPress plugin through 4.1 allows to bulk-set many settings in WordPress, including the admin email, as well as creating a new admin account. There is no CSRF protection in place, allowing an attacker to arbitrary change the admin email or create another admin account and takeover the website via CSRF attacks