Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-28042

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-01 Nov, 2020 | 04:50
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected At-
Credits

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:01 Nov, 2020 | 04:50
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:02 Nov, 2020 | 21:15
Updated At:17 Nov, 2020 | 17:55

ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

servicestack
servicestack
>>servicestack>>Versions before 5.9.2(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:servicestack:servicestack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850cve@mitre.org
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585eecve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://forums.servicestack.net/t/servicestack-v5-9-2-released/8850
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/commit/540d4060e877a03ae95343c1a8560a26768585ee
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/advisories/servicestack-jwt-signature-verification-bypass/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.shielder.it/blog/2020/11/re-discovering-a-jwt-authentication-bypass-in-servicestack/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

75Records found

CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13101
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2020 | 07:04
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OASIS Digital Signature Services (DSS) 1.0, an attacker can control the validation outcome (i.e., trigger either a valid or invalid outcome for a valid or invalid signature) via a crafted XML signature, when the InlineXML option is used. This defeats the expectation of non-repudiation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oasis-openn/a
Product-oasis_digital_signature_servicesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-11093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 20:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authorization bypass in Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger Indy Node is the server portion of a distributed ledger purpose-built for decentralized identity. In Hyperledger Indy before version 1.12.4, there is lack of signature verification on a specific transaction which enables an attacker to make certain unauthorized alterations to the ledger. Updating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender. A malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because 1) Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions), 2) Any DID can change any other DID's alias, 3) The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerThe Linux Foundation
Product-indy-nodeindy-node
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-28804
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 9.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2023 | 13:33
Updated-17 Oct, 2024 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Linux ZCC allows unsigned updates, allowing elevated Code Execution

An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector on Linux allows replacing binaries.This issue affects Linux Client Connector: before 1.4.0.105

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zscaler, Inc.
Product-client_connectorClient Connectorclient_connector
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-9154
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 60.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:39
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to pass off unsigned data as signed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openpgpjsn/a
Product-openpgpjsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-9153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 58.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openpgpjsn/a
Product-openpgpjsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2017-17847
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Dec, 2017 | 23:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-enigmailn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxenigmailn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2017-17848
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 75.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Dec, 2017 | 23:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. In a variant of CVE-2017-17847, signature spoofing is possible for multipart/related messages because a signed message part can be referenced with a cid: URI but not actually displayed. In other words, the entire containing message appears to be signed, but the recipient does not see any of the signed text.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-enigmailn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxenigmailn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2017-16005
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Http-signature is a "Reference implementation of Joyent's HTTP Signature Scheme". In versions <=0.9.11, http-signature signs only the header values, but not the header names. This makes http-signature vulnerable to header forgery. Thus, if an attacker can intercept a request, he can swap header names and change the meaning of the request without changing the signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-joyentHackerOne
Product-http-signaturehttp-signature node module
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-44878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pac4jn/a
Product-pac4jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-28818
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-19 Feb, 2025 | 22:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics 11 before 11.2.0. The application upgrade process included unsigned files that could be exploited and result in a customer installing unauthentic components. A malicious actor could install rogue Collector executable files (aptare.jar or upgrademanager.zip) on the Portal server, which might then be downloaded and installed on collectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aVeritas Technologies LLC
Product-netbackup_it_analyticsaptare_it_analyticsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-494
Download of Code Without Integrity Check
CVE-2025-68925
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 6.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jan, 2026 | 19:30
Updated-20 Jan, 2026 | 17:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Jervis has a JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability

Jervis is a library for Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Prior to 2.2, the code doesn't validate that the JWT header specifies "alg":"RS256". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-samrocketmansamrocketman
Product-jervisjervis
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41830
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 74.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double Certificate Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate signed documents and macros to appear to come from a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25633 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41832
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 74.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Certificate Validation Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate documents to appear to be signed by a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25635 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-2030
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.04% / 14.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jan, 2024 | 13:57
Updated-20 Nov, 2025 | 04:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in GitLab

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.2 prior to 16.5.6, 16.6 prior to 16.6.4, and 16.7 prior to 16.7.2 in which an attacker could potentially modify the metadata of signed commits.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.44% / 81.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate the timestamp of signed documents. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25634 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2015-7336
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2020 | 14:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 07:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A vulnerability was reported (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo System Update version 5.07.0008 and prior that could allow the signature check of an update to be bypassed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aLenovo Group Limited
Product-system_updaten/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-34433
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 15.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2021 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-californiumEclipse Californium
CWE ID-CWE-322
Key Exchange without Entity Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-33054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:40
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-inversen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxsogon/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-30130
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpseclibn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxphpseclibn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29500
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 20:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature

bubble fireworks is an open source java package relating to Spring Framework. In bubble fireworks before version 2021.BUILD-SNAPSHOT there is a vulnerability in which the package did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows to forgery of valid JWTs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bubble_fireworks_projectfxbin
Product-bubble_fireworksbubble-fireworks
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24772
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24771
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in node-forge

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24884
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.12% / 31.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 May, 2022 | 23:50
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Trivial signature forgery in ecdsautils

ecdsautils is a tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify). `ecdsa_verify_[prepare_]legacy()` does not check whether the signature values `r` and `s` are non-zero. A signature consisting only of zeroes is always considered valid, making it trivial to forge signatures. Requiring multiple signatures from different public keys does not mitigate the issue: `ecdsa_verify_list_legacy()` will accept an arbitrary number of such forged signatures. Both the `ecdsautil verify` CLI command and the libecdsautil library are affected. The issue has been fixed in ecdsautils 0.4.1. All older versions of ecdsautils (including versions before the split into a library and a CLI utility) are vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecdsautils_projectfreifunk-gluonFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ecdsautilsdebian_linuxfedoraecdsautils
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-17561
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 73.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:44
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not fully validate code signatures. An attacker could modify the downloaded nbm and include additional code. "Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29455
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2021 | 19:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature in `grassrootza/grassroot-platform`

Grassroot Platform is an application to make it faster, cheaper and easier to persistently organize and mobilize people in low-income communities. Grassroot Platform before master deployment as of 2021-04-16 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens when refreshing an existing JWT. This allows to forge a valid JWT. The problem has been patched in version 1.3.1 by deprecating the JWT refresh function, which was an overdue deprecation regardless (the "refresh" flow is no longer used).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grassrootgrassrootza
Product-grassroot_platformgrassroot-platform
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-28091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.64% / 70.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:39
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Lasso all versions prior to 2.7.0 has improper verification of a cryptographic signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-entrouvertn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-lassodebian_linuxfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-15545
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2019 | 17:07
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the libp2p-core crate before 0.8.1 for Rust. Attackers can spoof ed25519 signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libp2pn/a
Product-libp2pn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-49394
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 02:07
Updated-21 Nov, 2025 | 06:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Mutt: neomutt: in-reply-to email header field it not protected by cryptograpic signing

In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-neomuttmuttRed Hat, Inc.
Product-enterprise_linuxmuttneomuttRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39200
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 28.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Sep, 2022 | 20:10
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Signature checks not applied to some retrieved missing events

Dendrite is a Matrix homeserver written in Go. In affected versions events retrieved from a remote homeserver using the `/get_missing_events` path did not have their signatures verified correctly. This could potentially allow a remote homeserver to provide invalid/modified events to Dendrite via this endpoint. Note that this does not apply to events retrieved through other endpoints (e.g. `/event`, `/state`) as they have been correctly verified. Homeservers that have federation disabled are not vulnerable. The problem has been fixed in Dendrite 0.9.8. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Matrix.org Foundation
Product-dendritedendrite
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-11755
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.41% / 61.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2019 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A crafted S/MIME message consisting of an inner encryption layer and an outer SignedData layer was shown as having a valid digital signature, although the signer might have had no access to the contents of the encrypted message, and might have stripped a different signature from the encrypted message. Previous versions had only suppressed showing a digital signature for messages with an outer multipart/signed layer. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 68.1.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-thunderbirdThunderbird
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-45607
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.91% / 76.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Sep, 2024 | 19:58
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 02:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
whatsapp-api-js fails to validate message's signature

whatsapp-api-js is a TypeScript server agnostic Whatsapp's Official API framework. It's possible to check the payload validation using the WhatsAppAPI.verifyRequestSignature and expect false when the signature is valid. Incorrect Access Control, anyone using the post or verifyRequestSignature methods to handle messages is impacted. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.0.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-secreto31126Secreto31126
Product-whatsapp-api-jswhatsapp-api-js
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-7644
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.86%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-05 Mar, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The XmlSecLibs library as used in the saml2 library in SimpleSAMLphp before 1.15.3 incorrectly verifies signatures on SAML assertions, allowing a remote attacker to construct a crafted SAML assertion on behalf of an Identity Provider that would pass as cryptographically valid, thereby allowing them to impersonate a user from that Identity Provider, aka a key confusion issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-simplesamlphpn/a
Product-simplesamlphpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-7340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2019 | 14:01
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Multiple SAML libraries may allow authentication bypass via incorrect XML canonicalization and DOM traversal

Duo Network Gateway 1.2.9 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Duo SecurityCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-duo_network_gatewayDuo Network Gateway
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-5387
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jul, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Wizkunde SAMLBase may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wizkundeWizkunde
Product-samlbaseSAMLBase
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24773
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not properly check `DigestInfo` for a proper ASN.1 structure. This can lead to successful verification with signatures that contain invalid structures but a valid digest. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-8133
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 37.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2020 | 14:25
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A wrong generation of the passphrase for the encrypted block in Nextcloud Server 19.0.1 allowed an attacker to overwrite blocks in a file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNextcloud GmbH
Product-nextcloud_serverNextcloud Server
CWE ID-CWE-657
Violation of Secure Design Principles
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-21134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 60.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 19:10
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 19:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A firmware update vulnerability exists in the &quot;update&quot; firmware checks functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to firmware update. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aReolink Innovation Limited
Product-rlc-410w_firmwarerlc-410wn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-16151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.68% / 82.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Sep, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-03 Dec, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data after the encoded algorithm OID during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Similar to the flaw in the same version of strongSwan regarding digestAlgorithm.parameters, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-strongswann/aCanonical Ltd.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-strongswanubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-15836
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Sep, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In verify_signed_hash() in lib/liboswkeys/signatures.c in Openswan before 2.6.50.1, the RSA implementation does not verify the value of padding string during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used. IKEv2 signature verification is affected when RAW RSA keys are used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-xelerancen/a
Product-openswann/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2018-18509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Apr, 2019 | 16:13
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 11:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw during verification of certain S/MIME signatures causes emails to be shown in Thunderbird as having a valid digital signature, even if the shown message contents aren't covered by the signature. The flaw allows an attacker to reuse a valid S/MIME signature to craft an email message with arbitrary content. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.5.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-thunderbirdThunderbird
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-5390
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.76% / 73.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jan, 2020 | 18:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertion that have been signed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pysaml2_projectn/aCanonical Ltd.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-ubuntu_linuxpysaml2debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2016-1000342
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 65.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 17:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bouncycastlen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxbc-javan/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2016-1000338
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.37% / 59.24%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-01 Jun, 2018 | 00:00
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 14:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bouncycastlen/aRed Hat, Inc.NetApp, Inc.Canonical Ltd.
Product-satellite_capsulesatellite7-mode_transition_toolubuntu_linuxlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-apin/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36563
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 29.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Dec, 2022 | 21:13
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Weak hash (SHA-1) in github.com/RobotsAndPencils/go-saml

XML Digital Signatures generated and validated using this package use SHA-1, which may allow an attacker to craft inputs which cause hash collisions depending on their control over the input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-robotsandpencilsgithub.com/RobotsAndPencils/go-saml
Product-go-samlgithub.com/RobotsAndPencils/go-saml
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-21405
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 21:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BLS Signature "Malleability"

Lotus is an Implementation of the Filecoin protocol written in Go. BLS signature validation in lotus uses blst library method VerifyCompressed. This method accepts signatures in 2 forms: "serialized", and "compressed", meaning that BLS signatures can be provided as either of 2 unique byte arrays. Lotus block validation functions perform a uniqueness check on provided blocks. Two blocks are considered distinct if the CIDs of their blockheader do not match. The CID method for blockheader includes the BlockSig of the block. The result of these issues is that it would be possible to punish miners for valid blocks, as there are two different valid block CIDs available for each block, even though this must be unique. By switching from the go based `blst` bindings over to the bindings in `filecoin-ffi`, the code paths now ensure that all signatures are compressed by size and the way they are deserialized. This happened in https://github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/pull/5393.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filecoinfilecoin-project
Product-lotuslotus
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36284
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:36
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.4.93.4.9, for android, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-28086
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 26.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2020 | 18:09
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

pass through 1.7.3 has a possibility of using a password for an unintended resource. For exploitation to occur, the user must do a git pull, decrypt a password, and log into a remote service with the password. If an attacker controls the central Git server or one of the other members' machines, and also controls one of the services already in the password store, they can rename one of the password files in the Git repository to something else: pass doesn't correctly verify that the content of a file matches the filename, so a user might be tricked into decrypting the wrong password and sending that to a service that the attacker controls. NOTE: for environments in which this threat model is of concern, signing commits can be a solution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zx2c4n/a
Product-password-storen/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found