A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Users logged into the Apache CloudStack's web interface can be tricked to submit malicious CSRF requests due to missing validation of the origin of the requests. This can allow an attacker to gain privileges and access to resources of the authenticated users and may lead to account takeover, disruption, exposure of sensitive data and compromise integrity of the resources owned by the user account that are managed by the platform. This issue affects Apache CloudStack from 4.15.1.0 through 4.18.2.3 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.1 Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.4 or 4.19.1.2, or later, which addresses this issue.

payment_manage.ajax.php and various *_manage.ajax.php in MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.4 directly insert values from the sSortDir_0 parameter into a SQL string. This allows an attacker to inject their own SQL and manipulate the query, typically extracting data from the database, aka SQL Injection. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-19732.

A flaw in the WordPress plugin, WP Maintenance before 5.0.6, allowed attackers to enable a vulnerable site's maintenance mode and inject malicious code affecting site visitors. There was CSRF with resultant XSS.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.18.0, 5.17.2, 5.16.4, 5.15.4, and 5.9.7. CSRF can sometimes occur via a crafted web site for account takeover attacks.

In MIELE XGW 3000 ZigBee Gateway before 2.4.0, a malicious website visited by an authenticated admin user or a malicious mail is allowed to make arbitrary changes in the "admin panel" because there is no CSRF protection.

Delta Controls enteliTOUCH 3.40.3935, 3.40.3706, and 3.33.4005 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP request.

WooCommerce before 3.6.5, when it handles CSV imports of products, has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issue with resultant stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via includes/admin/importers/class-wc-product-csv-importer-controller.php.

An issue was discovered on NETGEAR WNR1000V4 1.1.0.54 devices. Multiple actions within the WNR1000V4 web management console are vulnerable to an unauthenticated GET request (exploitable directly or through CSRF), as demonstrated by the setup.cgi?todo=save_htp_account URI.

A CSRF issue was discovered on Intelbras IWR 3000N 1.8.7 devices, leading to complete control of the router, as demonstrated by v1/system/user.

Axigen Mail Server before 10.5.57 and 10.6.x before 10.6.26 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAdmin interface through improper handling of the _s (breadcrumb) parameter. The application accepts state-changing requests via the GET method and automatically processes base64-encoded commands queued in the _s parameter immediately after administrator authentication. Attackers can craft malicious URLs that, when clicked by administrators, execute arbitrary administrative actions upon login without further user interaction, including creating rogue administrator accounts or modifying critical server configurations.

An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. It does not use CSRF Tokens to mitigate against CSRF; it uses the Origin header (which must match the request origin). This is problematic in conjunction with XSS: one can escalate privileges from User level to Administrator.

MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.3 does not set the SameSite flag on session cookies, allowing the cookie to be sent in cross-site requests and potentially be used in cross-site request forgery attacks.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.

RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to CSRF because GET requests can be used for renames and deletions.

index.php/team_members/add_team_member in RISE Ultimate Project Manager 2.3 has CSRF for adding authorized users.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Edit Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can take over a user account by changing the password, update users' details, and escalate privileges via RAPR/DefineUsersSet.html.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brevo Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue.This issue affects Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue: from n/a through 3.1.82.

FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/page/add.

In Zmanda Management Console 3.3.9, ZMC_Admin_Advanced?form=adminTasks&action=Apply&command= allows CSRF, as demonstrated by command injection with shell metacharacters. This may depend on weak default credentials.

Intelbras RF1200 1.1.3 devices allow CSRF to bypass the login.html form, as demonstrated by launching a scrapy process.

Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows CSRF in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component admin_room_removed.php of Hotel Management System commit 91caab8 allows attackers to escalate privileges.

Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/admin_group.php?mode=delete&group_id=3

The wpForo plugin 1.6.5 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=wpforo-usergroups CSRF.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component delete_user.php of Warehouse Inventory System v2.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges.

Xerox AltaLink C8035 printers allow CSRF. A request to add users is made in the Device User Database form field to the xerox.set URI. (The frmUserName value must have a unique name.)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10up Simple Local Avatars.This issue affects Simple Local Avatars: from n/a through 2.7.10.

An issue was discovered in fastadmin 1.0.0.20190705_beta. There is a public/index.php/admin/auth/admin/add CSRF vulnerability.

The animate-it plugin before 2.3.6 for WordPress has CSRF in edsanimate.php.

WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.

The csrf_callback function in the CSRF Magic library through 2016-03-27 is vulnerable to CSRF protection bypass as it allows one to tamper with the csrf token values. A remote attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious page and dispersing it to a victim via social engineering, enticing them to click the link. Once the user/victim clicks the "try again" button, the attacker can take over the account and perform unintended actions on the victim's behalf. NOTE: A third-party maintainer has stated that this CVE is a false report. They state that the csrf_callback function is actually a callback function to the callers own handler for output. The function called can be changed via configuration to a custom callback to handle failed validation differently. They also stated that there is no way for an attacker to change tokens to make them valid from the client side. The only thing an attack can do is to pull the token out of the javascript, but that will always be possible and has nothing to do with the callback

An issue was discovered on V-Zug Combi-Steam MSLQ devices before Ethernet R07 and before WLAN R05. There is no CSRF protection established on the web service.

A CSRF issue in WiKID 2FA Enterprise Server through 4.2.0-b2053 allows a remote attacker to trick an authenticated user into performing unintended actions such as (1) create or delete admin users; (2) create or delete groups; or (3) create, delete, enable, or disable normal users or devices.

OpenWRT firmware version 18.06.4 is vulnerable to CSRF via wireless/radio0.network1, wireless/radio1.network1, firewall, firewall/zones, firewall/forwards, firewall/rules, network/wan, network/wan6, or network/lan under /cgi-bin/luci/admin/network/.

Sourcecodester Online Grading System 1.0 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability due to a lack of CSRF protection. This could lead to an attacker tricking the administrator into executing arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page, as demonstrated by a Create User action at the admin/modules/user/controller.php?action=add URI.

CSRF vulnerability in narda miteq Uplink Power Contril Unit UPC2 v.1.17 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Web-based management interface and specifically the /system_setup.htm, /set_clock.htm, /receiver_setup.htm, /cal.htm?..., and /channel_setup.htm endpoints

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments.

FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/layout/edit/1.

For Eclipse Che versions 6.16 to 7.3.0, with both authentication and TLS disabled, visiting a malicious web site could trigger the start of an arbitrary Che workspace. Che with no authentication and no TLS is not usually deployed on a public network but is often used for local installations (e.g. on personal laptops). In that case, even if the Che API is not exposed externally, some javascript running in the local browser is able to send requests to it.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user, including modifying the device configuration. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an interface user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user. Software versions prior to 8.3.150.0, 8.5.135.0, and 8.8.100.0 are affected.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user interface of Fortinet FortiSIEM 5.2.5 could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform arbitrary actions using an authenticated user's session by persuading the victim to follow a malicious link.

OSIsoft PI Vision, All versions of PI Vision prior to 2019. The affected product is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery that may be introduced on the PI Vision administration site.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/slide/delete.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/nav/save.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/category/delete.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/friend_link/update.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/friend_link/delete.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 1.22 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified hostname and port using attacker-specified username and password.