Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-28500

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-18 Mar, 2026 | 01:15
Updated At-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:11
Rejected At-
Credits

ONNX Untrusted Model Repository Warnings Suppressed by silent=True in onnx.hub.load() — Silent Supply-Chain Attack

Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) is an open standard for machine learning interoperability. In versions up to and including 1.20.1, a security control bypass exists in onnx.hub.load() due to improper logic in the repository trust verification mechanism. While the function is designed to warn users when loading models from non-official sources, the use of the silent=True parameter completely suppresses all security warnings and confirmation prompts. This vulnerability transforms a standard model-loading function into a vector for Zero-Interaction Supply-Chain Attacks. When chained with file-system vulnerabilities, an attacker can silently exfiltrate sensitive files (SSH keys, cloud credentials) from the victim's machine the moment the model is loaded. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:18 Mar, 2026 | 01:15
Updated At:15 Jul, 2026 | 01:11
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
ONNX Untrusted Model Repository Warnings Suppressed by silent=True in onnx.hub.load() — Silent Supply-Chain Attack

Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) is an open standard for machine learning interoperability. In versions up to and including 1.20.1, a security control bypass exists in onnx.hub.load() due to improper logic in the repository trust verification mechanism. While the function is designed to warn users when loading models from non-official sources, the use of the silent=True parameter completely suppresses all security warnings and confirmation prompts. This vulnerability transforms a standard model-loading function into a vector for Zero-Interaction Supply-Chain Attacks. When chained with file-system vulnerabilities, an attacker can silently exfiltrate sensitive files (SSH keys, cloud credentials) from the victim's machine the moment the model is loaded. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

Affected Products
Vendor
onnx
Product
onnx
Versions
Affected
  • <= 1.20.1
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-345CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWECWE-494CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check
CWECWE-693CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-345
Description: CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-494
Description: CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-693
Description: CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.6HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.6
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/onnx/onnx/security/advisories/GHSA-hqmj-h5c6-369m
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/onnx/onnx/security/advisories/GHSA-hqmj-h5c6-369m
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
exploit
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
Resource:
exploit
2. onnx: ONNX: Untrusted Model Repository Warnings Suppressed

A flaw was found in Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX), an open standard for machine learning interoperability. A security control bypass exists in the `onnx.hub.load()` function due to improper logic in its repository trust verification. An attacker can exploit this by providing a malicious model, which, when loaded with the `silent=True` parameter, suppresses all security warnings. This vulnerability transforms a standard model-loading function into a vector for Zero-Interaction Supply-Chain Attacks.

Affected Products
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078312 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078429 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780069222 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078632 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078416 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780417775 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078388 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780069146 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078413 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780069226 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078629 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078414 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780078632 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 1780069222 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
Collection URL
https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/
Package Name
rhoai/odh-openvino-model-server-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai
Default Status
affected
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-829Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-829
Description: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.6HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.6
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Red Hat severity rating
value:
Important
namespace:
https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25

Configurations

Workarounds

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Reported to Red Hat.2026-03-18 02:01:35
Made public.2026-03-18 01:15:07
Event: Reported to Red Hat.
Date: 2026-03-18 02:01:35
Event: Made public.
Date: 2026-03-18 01:15:07
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28500
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448518
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-28500.json
x_sadp-csaf-vex
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28500
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448518
Resource:
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-28500.json
Resource:
x_sadp-csaf-vex
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:18 Mar, 2026 | 02:16
Updated At:15 Jul, 2026 | 02:19

Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) is an open standard for machine learning interoperability. In versions up to and including 1.20.1, a security control bypass exists in onnx.hub.load() due to improper logic in the repository trust verification mechanism. While the function is designed to warn users when loading models from non-official sources, the use of the silent=True parameter completely suppresses all security warnings and confirmation prompts. This vulnerability transforms a standard model-loading function into a vector for Zero-Interaction Supply-Chain Attacks. When chained with file-system vulnerabilities, an attacker can silently exfiltrate sensitive files (SSH keys, cloud credentials) from the victim's machine the moment the model is loaded. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.18.6HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Primary3.19.1CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.18.6HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
N/A
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.6
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.1
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.6
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: N/A
Version:
Base score:
Base severity: N/A
Vector:
CPE Matches

The Linux Foundation
linuxfoundation
>>onnx>>Versions up to 1.20.1(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:onnx:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-345Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-494Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-693Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-829Secondary0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
CWE ID: CWE-345
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-494
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-693
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-829
Type: Secondary
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.mdsecurity-advisories@github.com
Patch
https://github.com/onnx/onnx/security/advisories/GHSA-hqmj-h5c6-369msecurity-advisories@github.com
Vendor Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:249770b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-285000b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=24485180b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Patch
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-28500.json0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/onnx/onnx/security/advisories/GHSA-hqmj-h5c6-369m
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28500
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448518
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/ZeroXJacks/CVEs/blob/main/2026/CVE-2026-28500.md
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-28500.json
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

157Records found

CVE-2026-2332
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 61.78%
||
7 Day CHG-0.04%
Published-14 Apr, 2026 | 10:59
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTTP Request Smuggling via Chunked Extension Quoted-String Parsing

In Eclipse Jetty, the HTTP/1.1 parser is vulnerable to request smuggling when chunk extensions are used, similar to the "funky chunks" techniques outlined here: * https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html * https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html Jetty terminates chunk extension parsing at \r\n inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error. POST / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost Transfer-Encoding: chunked 1;ext="val X 0 GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1 ... Note how the chunk extension does not close the double quotes, and it is able to inject a smuggled request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-jettyEclipse Jettystreams for Apache Kafka 2OpenShift Developer Tools and ServicesRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27streams for Apache Kafka 3Red Hat build of Debezium 3HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Red Hat Offline Knowledge Portal 1.2.9Red Hat JBoss Web Server 6Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat build of Debezium 2Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18 for Quarkus 3.33Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.5
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2026-33186
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.56% / 72.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Mar, 2026 | 22:23
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
gRPC-Go has an authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path

gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in `google.golang.org/grpc/authz` or custom interceptors relying on `info.FullMethod` or `grpc.Method(ctx)`; AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed `:path` headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a `:path` that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a `codes.Unimplemented` error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grpcgrpcRed Hat, Inc.
Product-grpcgrpc-goOpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat OpenShift for Windows ContainersLogical Volume Manager StorageBuilds for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14Kube Descheduler OperatorRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat OpenShift Dev Workspaces OperatorDevWorkspace Operator 0.4multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16Red Hat Web Terminal 1.15Red Hat Quay 3.14Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines 1.21OpenShift API for Data Protection 1.5Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Builds for Red Hat OpenShift 1.6.0Red Hat Quay 3.15Cryostat 4Deployment Validation OperatorMulticluster Global Hub 1.5.6Red Hat Quay 3OpenShift Service Mesh 2Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.1Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.4Red Hat Build of KueuePower monitoring for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.18Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9Red Hat OpenShift Builds 1.7.4Red Hat Quay 3.17Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager CLIRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8RHEM 1.1 for RHEL 9OpenShift Run Once Duration Override OperatorRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportOpenShift API for Data Protection 1.4multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9Migration Toolkit for ContainersStorage-Based RemediationExternalDNS OperatorRed Hat Edge Manager 1.1Red Hat Web Terminal 1.14cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShiftKernel Module Management Operator for Red Hat OpenshiftRHEM 1.1 for RHEL 10Machine Deletion Remediation OperatorRed Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewConfidential Compute AttestationRed Hat Service Interconnect 1Assisted Installer for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 2Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9RHEM 1.0 for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2Migration Toolkit for VirtualizationRed Hat AI Inference ServerLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift 6.4Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Leader Worker SetMigration Toolkit for Applications 8Job Set Tech PreviewRed Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Zero Trust Workload Identity Manager - Tech PreviewMulticluster Global Hub 1.4.5Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines 1.2Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.8Service Telemetry Framework 1.5Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3OpenShift LightspeedRed Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.21multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11.0Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat Connectivity Link 1Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Zero Trust Workload Identity Managermulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6Red Hat Lightspeed (formerly Insights) for Runtimes 1.0Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Custom Metric Autoscaler operator for Red Hat OpenshiftRed Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2File Integrity OperatorGatekeeper 3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2OpenShift Developer Tools and ServicesMulticluster Engine for KubernetesRed Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerExternal Secrets Operator for Red Hat OpenShiftOpenShift Secondary Scheduler OperatorRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14OpenShift API for Data ProtectionRed Hat Certification Program for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Quay 3.1Compliance Operator 1Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.20Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.19Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4Self Node Remediation OperatorMulticluster Global Hub 1.3.4Security Profiles OperatorRed Hat Edge Manager 1.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Build of Podman DesktopRed Hat Web Terminal 1.13Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9Multicluster Global HubRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19OpenShift API for Data Protection 1.6Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0OpenShift ServerlessRed Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat Quay 3.16Dynamic Accelerator Slicer Operator for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-285
Improper Authorization
CWE ID-CWE-551
Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization
CVE-2026-33216
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 29.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2026 | 19:41
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NATS has MQTT plaintext password disclosure

NATS-Server is a High-Performance server for NATS.io, a cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to versions 2.11.15 and 2.12.6, for MQTT deployments using usercodes/passwords: MQTT passwords are incorrectly classified as a non-authenticating identity statement (JWT) and exposed via monitoring endpoints. Versions 2.11.14 and 2.12.6 contain a fix. As a workaround, ensure monitoring end-points are adequately secured. Best practice remains to not expose the monitoring endpoint to the Internet or other untrusted network users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nats-ioThe Linux FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-nats-servernats-serverMulticluster Global Hub 1.4.5Red Hat multicluster global hub 1.5.2Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-213
Exposure of Sensitive Information Due to Incompatible Policies
CWE ID-CWE-256
Plaintext Storage of a Password
CVE-2025-41118
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Grafana Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Grafana Labs
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.41% / 33.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2026 | 19:15
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Sensitive COS `SecretKey` exposed in plaintext via configuration API due to missing type protection

Pyroscope is an open-source continuous profiling database. The database supports various storage backends, including Tencent Cloud Object Storage (COS). If the database is configured to use Tencent COS as the storage backend, an attacker could extract the secret_key configuration value from the Pyroscope API. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker needs direct access to the Pyroscope API. We highly recommend limiting the public internet exposure of all our databases, such that they are only accessible by trusted users or internal systems. This vulnerability is fixed in versions: 1.15.x: 1.15.2 and above. 1.16.x: 1.16.1 and above. 1.17.x: 1.17.0 and above (i.e. all versions). Thanks to Théo Cusnir for reporting this vulnerability to us via our bug bounty program.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Grafana Labs
Product-pyroscopePyroscopeRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Red Hat Ceph Storage 5Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Ceph Storage 6Multicluster Global HubMulticluster Global Hub 1.7.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-201
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
CWE ID-CWE-732
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
CVE-2026-42044
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.59% / 44.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2026 | 17:49
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Axios: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `parseReviver`

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.15.2, he Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses — including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass. The default transformResponse function at lib/defaults/index.js:124 calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver), where this is the merged config object. Because parseReviver is not present in Axios defaults, not validated by assertOptions, and not subject to any constraints, a polluted Object.prototype.parseReviver function is called for every key-value pair in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axiosaxiosRed Hat, Inc.
Product-axiosaxiosRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Quay 3.17Network Observability OperatorStreams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzermulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14Self-service automation portal 2Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Satellite 6.18Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.15Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewRed Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11.0multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat Developer HubRed Hat Quay 3.14Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2streams for Apache Kafka 3Red Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Quay 3.15Cryostat 4Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Gatekeeper 3OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Quay 3.16
CWE ID-CWE-1321
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CVE-2026-39832
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.60% / 45.17%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-22 May, 2026 | 02:31
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invoking agent constraints dropped when forwarding keys in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent

When adding a key to a remote agent constraint extensions such as restrict-destination-v00@openssh.com were not serialized in the request. Destination restrictions were silently stripped when forwarding keys, allowing unrestricted use of the key on the remote host. The client now serializes all constraint extensions. Additionally, the in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() now rejects keys with unsupported constraint extensions instead of silently ignoring them.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/cryptoRed Hat, Inc.Go
Product-cryptogolang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agentRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9Red Hat OpenShift Builds 1.7.4Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Multicluster Engine for KubernetesRed Hat Quay 3.12RHEM 1.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10External Secrets Operator for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Ceph Storage 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4Red Hat Edge Manager 1.1Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRHEM 1.1 for RHEL 10Red Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat OpenShift Dev Workspaces OperatorRed Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat OpenShift Builds 1.8.1Assisted Installer for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 2Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.22RHEM 1.0 for RHEL 9Red Hat Edge Manager 1.0Red Hat Quay 3.15OpenShift API for Data Protection 1.6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1Red Hat Quay 3Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2OpenShift PipelinesOpenShift ServerlessRed Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0Red Hat Quay 3.16
CWE ID-CWE-281
Improper Preservation of Permissions
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CVE-2026-44492
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 55.09%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 15:29
Updated-27 Jul, 2026 | 13:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Axios: shouldBypassProxy does not recognize IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, allowing NO_PROXY bypass (incomplete fix for CVE-2025-62718)

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios does not normalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. When NO_PROXY lists an IPv4 address such as 127.0.0.1 or 169.254.169.254, a request URL using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form (::ffff:7f00:1, ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe) still routes through the configured proxy. Node.js resolves these addresses to the underlying IPv4 host, so the request reaches the internal service via the proxy rather than being blocked. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axiosaxiosRed Hat, Inc.
Product-axiosaxiosRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.14Network Observability OperatorRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzermulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.13Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Quay 3.16Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.2Red Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.29Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewRed Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Quay 3.15Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Cryostat 4multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Gatekeeper 3OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10
CWE ID-CWE-289
Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-8450
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.40% / 69.62%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-27 May, 2026 | 04:22
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 11:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTTP::Daemon versions before 6.17 for Perl allow OS command injection via send_file()

HTTP::Daemon versions before 6.17 for Perl allow OS command injection via send_file(). send_file() opens its string argument with Perl's 2-arg open(). The 2-arg form interprets magic prefixes: '| cmd' and 'cmd |' open a pipe to a subprocess, '> path' and '>> path' open the path for write or append. Untrusted input passed to send_file() can run OS commands at the daemon process UID. The read-pipe form ('cmd |') also leaks subprocess stdout into the HTTP response body. The write-mode forms can create or truncate files at attacker chosen paths.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OALDERSRed Hat, Inc.
Product-HTTP::DaemonRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-73
External Control of File Name or Path
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CVE-2025-68428
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.06% / 79.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jan, 2026 | 21:43
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
jsPDF has Local File Inclusion/Path Traversal vulnerability

jsPDF is a library to generate PDFs in JavaScript. Prior to version 4.0.0, user control of the first argument of the loadFile method in the node.js build allows local file inclusion/path traversal. If given the possibility to pass unsanitized paths to the loadFile method, a user can retrieve file contents of arbitrary files in the local file system the node process is running in. The file contents are included verbatim in the generated PDFs. Other affected methods are `addImage`, `html`, and `addFont`. Only the node.js builds of the library are affected, namely the `dist/jspdf.node.js` and `dist/jspdf.node.min.js` files. The vulnerability has been fixed in jsPDF@4.0.0. This version restricts file system access per default. This semver-major update does not introduce other breaking changes. Some workarounds areavailable. With recent node versions, jsPDF recommends using the `--permission` flag in production. The feature was introduced experimentally in v20.0.0 and is stable since v22.13.0/v23.5.0/v24.0.0. For older node versions, sanitize user-provided paths before passing them to jsPDF.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parallparallaxRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jspdfjsPDFRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4
CWE ID-CWE-35
Path Traversal: '.../...//'
CWE ID-CWE-73
External Control of File Name or Path
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2019-14887
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.07% / 61.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 14:48
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found when an OpenSSL security provider is used with Wildfly, the 'enabled-protocols' value in the Wildfly configuration isn't honored. An attacker could target the traffic sent from Wildfly and downgrade the connection to a weaker version of TLS, potentially breaking the encryption. This could lead to a leak of the data being passed over the network. Wildfly version 7.2.0.GA, 7.2.3.GA and 7.2.5.CR2 are believed to be vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-jboss_data_gridsingle_sign-onopenshift_application_runtimesjboss_fusejboss_enterprise_application_platformwildflywildfly
CWE ID-CWE-757
Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade')
CVE-2019-14837
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.72% / 75.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2020 | 16:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in keycloack before version 8.0.0. The owner of 'placeholder.org' domain can setup mail server on this domain and knowing only name of a client can reset password and then log in. For example, for client name 'test' the email address will be 'service-account-test@placeholder.org'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-single_sign-onkeycloakkeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-547
Use of Hard-coded, Security-relevant Constants
CWE ID-CWE-798
Use of Hard-coded Credentials
CVE-2026-8948
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.42% / 34.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2026 | 12:29
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Same-origin policy bypass in the DOM: Networking component

Same-origin policy bypass in the DOM: Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151 and Thunderbird 151.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Mozilla Corporation
Product-thunderbirdfirefoxThunderbirdFirefoxRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CWE ID-CWE-942
Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains
CVE-2023-6394
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.81% / 53.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2023 | 01:26
Updated-24 Mar, 2026 | 12:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Quarkus: graphql operations over websockets bypass

A flaw was found in Quarkus. This issue occurs when receiving a request over websocket with no role-based permission specified on the GraphQL operation, Quarkus processes the request without authentication despite the endpoint being secured. This can allow an attacker to access information and functionality outside of normal granted API permissions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quarkusRed Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_quarkusquarkusRed Hat build of Quarkus 3.2.9.FinalRed Hat build of Quarkus 2.13.9.Final
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2025-61686
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-15.91% / 96.55%
||
7 Day CHG-0.19%
Published-10 Jan, 2026 | 02:41
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
React Router has Path Traversal in File Session Storage

React Router is a router for React. In @react-router/node versions 7.0.0 through 7.9.3, @remix-run/deno prior to version 2.17.2, and @remix-run/node prior to version 2.17.2, if createFileSessionStorage() is being used from @react-router/node (or @remix-run/node/@remix-run/deno in Remix v2) with an unsigned cookie, it is possible for an attacker to cause the session to try to read/write from a location outside the specified session file directory. The success of the attack would depend on the permissions of the web server process to access those files. Read files cannot be returned directly to the attacker. Session file reads would only succeed if the file matched the expected session file format. If the file matched the session file format, the data would be populated into the server side session but not directly returned to the attacker unless the application logic returned specific session information. This issue has been patched in @react-router/node version 7.9.4, @remix-run/deno version 2.17.2, and @remix-run/node version 2.17.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-shopifyremix-runRed Hat, Inc.
Product-remix-run\/denoreact-router\/noderemix-run\/nodereact-routerRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Quay 3Migration Toolkit for Applications 7Red Hat Developer HubRed Hat Build of KueueOpenShift PipelinesMulticluster Engine for KubernetesRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat Discovery 2Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Network Observability OperatorRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Migration Toolkit for VirtualizationOpenShift Service Mesh 2Red Hat Edge Manager 1Red Hat Edge Manager previewRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesRed Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat Fuse 7Gatekeeper 3Migration Toolkit for ContainersRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Node HealthCheck OperatorLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Cryostat 4Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Migration Toolkit for Applications 8OpenShift LightspeedRed Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Connectivity Link 1Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2026-53622
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 21.10%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-23 Jun, 2026 | 19:13
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik: HTTP/3 mTLS bypass via exact SNI TLSOptions lookup for wildcard and mixed-case hosts

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 3.7.3, there is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikRed Hat, Inc.
Product-traefiktraefikRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
CWE ID-CWE-288
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
CWE ID-CWE-289
Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name
CVE-2026-5081
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.30% / 22.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2026 | 12:16
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueId versions from 1.54 through 1.94 for Perl session ids are insecure

Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueId versions from 1.54 through 1.94 for Perl session ids are insecure. Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueId (added in version 1.54) uses the value of the UNIQUE_ID environment variable for the session id. The UNIQUE_ID variable is set by the Apache mod_unique_id plugin, which generates unique ids for the request. The id is based on the IPv4 address, the process id, the epoch time, a 16-bit counter and a thread index, with no obfuscation. The server IP is often available to the public, and if not available, can be guessed from previous session ids being issued. The process ids may also be guessed from previous session ids. The timestamp is easily guessed (and leaked in the HTTP Date response header). The purpose of mod_unique_id is to assign a unique id to requests so that events can be correlated in different logs. The id is not designed, nor is it suitable for security purposes.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-chornyCHORNYRed Hat, Inc.
Product-apache\Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueIdRed Hat Hardened Images
CWE ID-CWE-340
Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers
CWE ID-CWE-341
Predictable from Observable State
CVE-2026-48020
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 54.94%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-23 Jun, 2026 | 19:10
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik StripPrefix Route-Level Auth Bypass via Path Normalization

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.48, 3.6.19, and 3.7.3, there is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's StripPrefix middleware that allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass route-level authentication and authorization. When a public router matches on a PathPrefix rule and applies the StripPrefix middleware, a request path containing .. or its percent-encoded form %2e%2e can match the public route at routing time and then, after the prefix is stripped and the path is normalized, resolve to a path served by a separate, authenticated router. As a result, an attacker can reach protected backend paths — such as admin or internal configuration endpoints — without satisfying the authentication middleware attached to the protected router. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.11.48, 3.6.19, and 3.7.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikRed Hat, Inc.
Product-traefiktraefikRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CWE ID-CWE-288
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
CVE-2026-48491
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 20.18%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-23 Jun, 2026 | 19:12
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik: SNICheck ignores wildcard TLSOptions mappings, allowing domain-fronted mTLS bypass

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.7.0 until 3.7.3, there is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's domain-fronting protection (SNICheck) that allows an unauthenticated client to bypass mutual TLS enforced through wildcard router TLSOptions. When a router uses a wildcard host rule such as Host(*.example.com) with stricter TLS options (for example RequireAndVerifyClientCert), SNICheck resolves the TLS options for the HTTP Host header using exact map lookups only and never applies wildcard matching. If another permissive SNI is served on the same entrypoint, an attacker can complete the TLS handshake under the permissive options and then send an HTTP Host header targeting the wildcard-protected backend, reaching it without presenting a client certificate. This affects the regular HTTPS / HTTP-2 path and does not require HTTP/3. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikRed Hat, Inc.
Product-traefiktraefikRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
CWE ID-CWE-288
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
CWE ID-CWE-807
Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
CVE-2026-46244
Matching Score-8
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 24.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2026 | 15:48
Updated-22 Jul, 2026 | 20:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
netfilter: nft_inner: Fix IPv6 inner_thoff desync

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_inner: Fix IPv6 inner_thoff desync In nft_inner_parse_l2l3(), when processing inner IPv6 packets, ipv6_find_hdr() correctly computes the transport header offset traversing all extension headers, but the result is immediately overwritten with nhoff + sizeof(_ip6h) (40 bytes), which only accounts for the IPv6 base header. This creates a desync between inner_thoff (wrong — points to extension header start) and l4proto (correct — e.g., IPPROTO_TCP), enabling transport header forgery and potential firewall bypass. This issue affects stable versions from Linux 6.2. For comparison, the normal (non-inner) IPv6 path correctly preserves ipv6_find_hdr()'s result. Removing the incorrect overwrite ensures that ipv6_find_hdr()'s calculated transport header offset is preserved, thereby fixing the desynchronization.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions
CWE ID-CWE-823
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset
CVE-2026-4601
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.30% / 22.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-26 Jul, 2026 | 15:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.1.1 are vulnerable to Missing Cryptographic Step via the KJUR.crypto.DSA.signWithMessageHash process in the DSA signing implementation. An attacker can recover the private key by forcing r or s to be zero, so the library emits an invalid signature without retrying, and then solves for x from the resulting signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kjurn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jsrsasignjsrsasignorg.webjars.npm:jsrsasignMigration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9Red Hat Quay 3.1Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Quay 3.16Red Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat Quay 3.15
CWE ID-CWE-325
Missing Cryptographic Step
CVE-2026-4599
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.48% / 38.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 15:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package jsrsasign from 7.0.0 and before 11.1.1 are vulnerable to Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors via the getRandomBigIntegerZeroToMax and getRandomBigIntegerMinToMax functions in src/crypto-1.1.js; an attacker can recover the private key by exploiting the incorrect compareTo checks that accept out-of-range candidates and thus bias DSA nonces during signature generation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kjurn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jsrsasignjsrsasignorg.webjars.npm:jsrsasignMigration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9Red Hat Quay 3.1Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Quay 3.16Red Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat Quay 3.15
CWE ID-CWE-1023
Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors
CWE ID-CWE-338
Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)
CVE-2026-4600
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 13.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.1.1 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature via the DSA domain-parameter validation in KJUR.crypto.DSA.setPublic (and the related DSA/X509 verification flow in src/dsa-2.0.js). An attacker can forge DSA signatures or X.509 certificates that X509.verifySignature() accepts by supplying malicious domain parameters such as g=1, y=1, and a fixed r=1, which make the verification equation true for any hash.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kjurn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jsrsasignjsrsasignorg.webjars.npm:jsrsasignMigration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9Red Hat Quay 3.1Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Quay 3.16Red Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat Quay 3.15
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-44578
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-38.87% / 98.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:01
Updated-16 Jul, 2026 | 12:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Next.js: Server-side request forgery in applications using WebSocket upgrades

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests. An attacker can cause the server to proxy requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, which may expose internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Vercel-hosted deployments are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.16 and 16.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vercelvercelRed Hat, Inc.
Product-next.jsnext.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7streams for Apache Kafka 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.4Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-44172
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 44.09%
||
7 Day CHG+0.26%
Published-12 Jun, 2026 | 17:34
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MariaDB: mysql_real_escape_string() incorrectly handled big5

MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. In versions 3.3.18 and 3.4.8, an application that was taking non-validated user input, escaping it with mysql_real_escape_string() and sending it to the database using text protocol and big5 character set was vulnerable to SQL injections, even though mysql_real_escape_string() was supposed to prevent them. This issue has been patched in versions 3.3.19 and 3.4.9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.MariaDB Foundation
Product-mariadbenterprise_linuxserverRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Hardened Images
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CVE-2026-40976
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.49% / 39.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2026 | 23:34
Updated-24 Jul, 2026 | 21:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In certain circumstances, Spring Boot's default web security is ineffective allowing unauthorized access to all endpoints. For an application to be vulnerable, it must: be a servlet-based web application; have no Spring Security configuration of its own and rely on the default web security filter chain; depend on spring-boot-actuator-autoconfigure; not depend on spring-boot-health. If any of the above does not apply, the application is not vulnerable. Affected: Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5; upgrade to 4.0.6 or later per vendor advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)Red Hat, Inc.
Product-spring_bootSpring BootRed Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat AMQ ClientsRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2026-40982
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.73% / 50.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 03:49
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Spring Cloud Config allows applications to serve arbitrary text and binary files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead to a directory traversal attack. Spring Cloud Config 3.1.x: affected from 3.1.0 through 3.1.13 (inclusive); upgrade to 3.1.14 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.1.x: affected from 4.1.0 through 4.1.9 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.1.10 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.2.x: affected from 4.2.0 through 4.2.6 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.2.7 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.3.x: affected from 4.3.0 through 4.3.2 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.3.3 or greater. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.x: affected from 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 (inclusive); upgrade to 5.0.3 or greater.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)Red Hat, Inc.
Product-spring_cloud_configSpring Cloud ConfigRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2026-35030
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.49% / 39.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2026 | 16:47
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
LiteLLM has an authentication bypass via OIDC userinfo cache key collision

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. Prior to 1.83.0, when JWT authentication is enabled (enable_jwt_auth: true), the OIDC userinfo cache uses token[:20] as the cache key. JWT headers produced by the same signing algorithm generate identical first 20 characters. This configuration option is not enabled by default. Most instances are not affected. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a token whose first 20 characters match a legitimate user's cached token. On cache hit, the attacker inherits the legitimate user's identity and permissions. This affects deployments with JWT/OIDC authentication enabled. Fixed in v1.83.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-litellmBerriAIRed Hat, Inc.
Product-litellmlitellmLightspeed CoreRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-222
Truncation of Security-relevant Information
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2026-34582
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 14.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 21:13
Updated-24 Jul, 2026 | 22:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has a TLS 1.3 certificate authentication bypass

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. Prior to version 3.11.1, the TLS 1.3 implementation allowed ApplicationData records to be processed prior to the Finished message being received. A server which is attempting to enforce client authentication via certificates can by bypassed by a client which entirely omits Certificate, CertificateVerify, and the Finished message and instead sends application data records. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombitRed Hat, Inc.
Product-botanbotanRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-166
Improper Handling of Missing Special Element
CWE ID-CWE-841
Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow
CVE-2026-33557
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.68% / 48.79%
||
7 Day CHG+0.10%
Published-20 Apr, 2026 | 13:28
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Kafka: Missing JWT token validation in OAUTHBEARER authentication

A possible security vulnerability has been identified in Apache Kafka. By default, the broker property `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` is set to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.DefaultJwtValidator`. It accepts any JWT token without validating its signature, issuer, or audience. An attacker can generate a JWT token from any issuer with the `preferred_username` set to any user, and the broker will accept it. We advise the Kafka users using kafka v4.1.0 or v4.1.1 to set the config `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.BrokerJwtValidator` explicitly to avoid this vulnerability. Since Kafka v4.1.2 and v4.2.0 and later, the issue is fixed and will correctly validate the JWT token.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-kafkaApache KafkaRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat build of Debezium 2Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8streams for Apache Kafka 3Red Hat build of Debezium 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8OpenShift ServerlessRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7streams for Apache Kafka 2Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat build of Quarkus
CWE ID-CWE-1285
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input
CWE ID-CWE-303
Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
CVE-2026-28802
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.43% / 34.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2026 | 06:44
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authlib: Setting `alg: none` and a blank signature appears to bypass signature verification

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. From version 1.6.5 to before version 1.6.7, previous tests involving passing a malicious JWT containing alg: none and an empty signature was passing the signature verification step without any changes to the application code when a failure was expected.. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authlibauthlibRed Hat, Inc.
Product-authlibauthlibRed Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat Quay 3.16Red Hat Quay 3.9Red Hat Quay 3.15
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-28498
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 13.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2026 | 18:03
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authlib: Fail-Open Cryptographic Verification in OIDC Hash Binding

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.9, a library-level vulnerability was identified in the Authlib Python library concerning the validation of OpenID Connect (OIDC) ID Tokens. Specifically, the internal hash verification logic (_verify_hash) responsible for validating the at_hash (Access Token Hash) and c_hash (Authorization Code Hash) claims exhibits a fail-open behavior when encountering an unsupported or unknown cryptographic algorithm. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass mandatory integrity protections by supplying a forged ID Token with a deliberately unrecognized alg header parameter. The library intercepts the unsupported state and silently returns True (validation passed), inherently violating fundamental cryptographic design principles and direct OIDC specifications. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-authlibauthlibRed Hat, Inc.
Product-authlibauthlibRed Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Lightspeed CoreRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Quay 3.12Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat Quay 3.16Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Quay 3.15
CWE ID-CWE-325
Missing Cryptographic Step
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CWE ID-CWE-573
Improper Following of Specification by Caller
CVE-2026-28367
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 49.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 16:13
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 10:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator

A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator. This can be used for request smuggling with certain proxy servers, such as older versions of Apache Traffic Server and Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer, potentially leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_apache_camel_for_spring_bootdata_gridsingle_sign-onjboss_enterprise_application_platformfusejboss_enterprise_application_platform_expansion_packundertowbuild_of_apache_camel_-_hawtioprocess_automationRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2026-28368
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.70% / 49.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 16:13
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 10:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via inconsistent header parsing

A flaw was found in Undertow. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to construct specially crafted requests where header names are parsed differently by Undertow compared to upstream proxies. This discrepancy in header interpretation can be exploited to launch request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing unauthorized resources.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_apache_camel_for_spring_bootdata_gridsingle_sign-onenterprise_linuxjboss_enterprise_application_platformfusejboss_enterprise_application_platform_expansion_packundertowbuild_of_apache_camel_-_hawtioprocess_automationRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2026-28369
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.68% / 48.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 16:13
Updated-22 Jul, 2026 | 06:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via malformed http request headers

A flaw was found in Undertow. When Undertow receives an HTTP request where the first header line starts with one or more spaces, it incorrectly processes the request by stripping these leading spaces. This behavior, which violates HTTP standards, can be exploited by a remote attacker to perform request smuggling. Request smuggling allows an attacker to bypass security mechanisms, access restricted information, or manipulate web caches, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or data exposure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_apache_camel_for_spring_bootprocess_automationfusedata_gridsingle_sign-onjboss_enterprise_application_platform_expansion_packbuild_of_apache_camel_-_hawtiojboss_enterprise_application_platformenterprise_linuxundertowRed Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2026-27606
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-1.40% / 69.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Feb, 2026 | 02:08
Updated-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rollup 4 has Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal

Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript. Versions prior to 2.80.0, 3.30.0, and 4.59.0 of the Rollup module bundler (specifically v4.x and present in current source) is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal. Insecure file name sanitization in the core engine allows an attacker to control output filenames (e.g., via CLI named inputs, manual chunk aliases, or malicious plugins) and use traversal sequences (`../`) to overwrite files anywhere on the host filesystem that the build process has permissions for. This can lead to persistent Remote Code Execution (RCE) by overwriting critical system or user configuration files. Versions 2.80.0, 3.30.0, and 4.59.0 contain a patch for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rollupjsrollupRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rolluprollupRed Hat Developer Hub 1.8Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat Quay 3.1Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2026-27446
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-10.63% / 95.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Mar, 2026 | 08:48
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Artemis, Apache ActiveMQ Artemis: Auth bypass for Core downstream federation

Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306) vulnerability in Apache Artemis, Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the Core protocol to force a target broker to establish an outbound Core federation connection to an attacker-controlled rogue broker. This could potentially result in message injection into any queue and/or message exfiltration from any queue via the rogue broker. This impacts environments that allow both: - incoming Core protocol connections from untrusted sources to the broker - outgoing Core protocol connections from the broker to untrusted targets This issue affects: - Apache Artemis from 2.50.0 through 2.51.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Artemis from 2.11.0 through 2.44.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Artemis version 2.52.0, which fixes the issue. The issue can be mitigated by one of the following: - Remove Core protocol support from any acceptor receiving connections from untrusted sources. Incoming Core protocol connections are supported by default via the "artemis" acceptor listening on port 61616. See the "protocols" URL parameter configured for the acceptor. An acceptor URL without this parameter supports all protocols by default, including Core. - Use two-way SSL (i.e. certificate-based authentication) in order to force every client to present the proper SSL certificate when establishing a connection before any message protocol handshake is attempted. This will prevent unauthenticated exploitation of this vulnerability. - Implement and deploy a Core interceptor to deny all Core downstream federation connect packets. Such packets have a type of (int) -16 or (byte) 0xfffffff0. Documentation for interceptors is available at  https://artemis.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/intercepting-operations.html .

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AGThe Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-artemisApache ActiveMQ ArtemisApache ArtemisRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat AMQ ClientsRed Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.12.6Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8Opcenter RDnLRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.4Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8
CWE ID-CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CVE-2019-14859
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.60% / 73.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2020 | 14:15
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in all python-ecdsa versions before 0.13.3, where it did not correctly verify whether signatures used DER encoding. Without this verification, a malformed signature could be accepted, making the signature malleable. Without proper verification, an attacker could use a malleable signature to create false transactions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-python-ecdsa_projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-python-ecdsavirtualizationopenstackceph_storagepython-ecdsa
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-25965
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.67% / 48.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2026 | 01:20
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ImageMagick's policy bypass through path traversal allows reading restricted content despite secured policy

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40, ImageMagick’s path security policy is enforced on the raw filename string before the filesystem resolves it. As a result, a policy rule such as /etc/* can be bypassed by a path traversal. The OS resolves the traversal and opens the sensitive file, but the policy matcher only sees the unnormalized path and therefore allows the read. This enables local file disclosure (LFI) even when policy-secure.xml is applied. Actions to prevent reading from files have been taken in versions .7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40 But it make sure writing is also not possible the following should be added to one's policy. This will also be included in ImageMagick's more secure policies by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.ImageMagick Studio LLC
Product-imagemagickImageMagickRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2026-25580
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 44.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2026 | 21:01
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Pydantic AI Affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in URL Download Handling

Pydantic AI is a Python agent framework for building applications and workflows with Generative AI. From 0.0.26 to before 1.56.0, aServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Pydantic AI's URL download functionality. When applications accept message history from untrusted sources, attackers can include malicious URLs that cause the server to make HTTP requests to internal network resources, potentially accessing internal services or cloud credentials. This vulnerability only affects applications that accept message history from external users. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.56.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pydanticpydanticRed Hat, Inc.
Product-pydantic_aipydantic-aiRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-20912
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Gitea Limited
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Gitea Limited
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.41% / 34.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jan, 2026 | 22:01
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gitea: Cross-Repository Authorization Bypass via Release Attachment Linking Leads to Private Attachment Disclosure

Gitea does not properly validate repository ownership when linking attachments to releases. An attachment uploaded to a private repository could potentially be linked to a release in a different public repository, making it accessible to unauthorized users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-giteaGiteaRed Hat, Inc.
Product-giteaGitea Open Source Git ServerOpenShift Pipelines
CWE ID-CWE-283
Unverified Ownership
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control
CWE ID-CWE-639
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CVE-2026-0532
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Elastic
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Elastic
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.42% / 34.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2026 | 10:14
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
External Control of File Name or Path and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Kibana Google Gemini Connector

External Control of File Name or Path (CWE-73) combined with Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) can allow an attacker to cause arbitrary file disclosure through a specially crafted credentials JSON payload in the Google Gemini connector configuration. This requires an attacker to have authenticated access with privileges sufficient to create or modify connectors (Alerts & Connectors: All). The server processes a configuration without proper validation, allowing for arbitrary network requests and for arbitrary file reads.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Elasticsearch BV
Product-KibanaRed Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-59088
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 36.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2025 | 16:35
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Python-kdcproxy: unauthenticated ssrf via realm‑controlled dns srv

If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where the "use_dns" setting is explicitly set to false are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-latchsetRed Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-OnRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP SolutionskdcproxyRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-55130
Matching Score-8
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.1||HIGH
EPSS-1.63% / 73.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2026 | 20:41
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw in Node.js’s Permissions model allows attackers to bypass `--allow-fs-read` and `--allow-fs-write` restrictions using crafted relative symlink paths. By chaining directories and symlinks, a script granted access only to the current directory can escape the allowed path and read sensitive files. This breaks the expected isolation guarantees and enables arbitrary file read/write, leading to potential system compromise. This vulnerability affects users of the permission model on Node.js v20, v22, v24, and v25.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-node.jsnodeRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Hardened Images
CWE ID-CWE-281
Improper Preservation of Permissions
CWE ID-CWE-289
Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name
CVE-2026-40575
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.48% / 38.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2026 | 23:20
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OAuth2 Proxy has an Authentication Bypass via X-Forwarded-Uri Header Spoofing

OAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Versions 7.5.0 through 7.15.1 may trust a client-supplied `X-Forwarded-Uri` header when `--reverse-proxy` is enabled and `--skip-auth-regex` or `--skip-auth-route` is configured. An attacker can spoof this header so OAuth2 Proxy evaluates authentication and skip-auth rules against a different path than the one actually sent to the upstream application. This can result in an unauthenticated remote attacker bypassing authentication and accessing protected routes without a valid session. Impacted users are deployments that run oauth2-proxy with `--reverse-proxy` enabled and configure at least one `--skip-auth-regex` or `--skip-auth-route` rule. This issue is patched in `v7.15.2`. Some workarounds are available for those who cannot upgrade immediately. Strip any client-provided `X-Forwarded-Uri` header at the reverse proxy or load balancer level; explicitly overwrite `X-Forwarded-Uri` with the actual request URI before forwarding requests to OAuth2 Proxy; restrict direct client access to OAuth2 Proxy so it can only be reached through a trusted reverse proxy; and/or remove or narrow `--skip-auth-regex` / `--skip-auth-route` rules where possible. For nginx-based deployments, ensure `X-Forwarded-Uri` is set by nginx and not passed through from the client.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oauth2_proxy_projectoauth2-proxyRed Hat, Inc.
Product-oauth2_proxyoauth2-proxyRed Hat Ceph Storage 9
CWE ID-CWE-290
Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
CVE-2012-5562
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-1.03% / 60.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Dec, 2019 | 18:12
Updated-09 Apr, 2026 | 18:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rhn-proxy: rhn-satellite: rhn-proxy: information disclosure via clear-text credential transmission when accessing rhn satellite

A flaw was found in rhn-proxy. This vulnerability may allow the rhn-proxy to transmit user credentials in clear-text when it accesses RHN Satellite. This could lead to information disclosure, where sensitive authentication details are exposed to unauthorized parties.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-satelliteRed Hat Satellite 6
CWE ID-CWE-319
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
CVE-2024-12225
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.33% / 25.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2025 | 19:49
Updated-20 Nov, 2025 | 07:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Io.quarkus:quarkus-security-webauthn: quarkus webauthn unexpected authentication bypass

A vulnerability was found in Quarkus in the quarkus-security-webauthn module. The Quarkus WebAuthn module publishes default REST endpoints for registering and logging users in while allowing developers to provide custom REST endpoints. When developers provide custom REST endpoints, the default endpoints remain accessible, potentially allowing attackers to obtain a login cookie that has no corresponding user in the Quarkus application or, depending on how the application is written, could correspond to an existing user that has no relation with the current attacker, allowing anyone to log in as an existing user by just knowing that user's user name.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quarkusRed Hat, Inc.
Product-quarkusRed Hat build of Quarkus
CWE ID-CWE-288
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
CVE-2025-15031
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.85% / 54.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2026 | 22:06
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Path Traversal Vulnerability in mlflow/mlflow

A vulnerability in MLflow's pyfunc extraction process allows for arbitrary file writes due to improper handling of tar archive entries. Specifically, the use of `tarfile.extractall` without path validation enables crafted tar.gz files containing `..` or absolute paths to escape the intended extraction directory. This issue affects the latest version of MLflow and poses a high/critical risk in scenarios involving multi-tenant environments or ingestion of untrusted artifacts, as it can lead to arbitrary file overwrites and potential remote code execution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lfprojectsmlflowRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mlflowmlflow/mlflowRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2025-10263
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Arm Limited
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Arm Limited
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.55% / 42.72%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-09 Jun, 2026 | 09:23
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 08:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Arm C1-Ultra, C1-Premium, Neoverse V3 & V3AE, Neoverse V2, Neoverse V1, Neoverse-N2, Neoverse-N1, Cortex-X925, Cortex-X4, Cortex-X3, Cortex-X2, Cortex-X1 & X1C, Cortex-A710, Cortex-A78, A78AE & A78C, Cortex-A77, Cortex-A76 & A76A may allow writes to resources owned by a higher exception level.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Arm Limited
Product-Cortex-X4Neoverse V3Cortex-A78Cortex-X1Cortex-X3C1-PremiumCortex-X1CCortex-A78AECortex-X2C1-UltraNeoverse N2Neoverse V1Neoverse V3AECortex-A76Cortex-A76AENeoverse N1Cortex-X925Cortex-A710Cortex-A77Cortex-A78CRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux for NVIDIA 26Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-266
Incorrect Privilege Assignment
CWE ID-CWE-362
Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
CVE-2017-17697
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-1.39% / 69.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2017 | 09:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Ping() function in ui/api/target.go in Harbor through 1.3.0-rc4 has SSRF via the endpoint parameter to /api/targets/ping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Linux Foundation
Product-harborn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-5367
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 55.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2026 | 12:25
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ovn: ovn: information disclosure via crafted dhcpv6 packets

A flaw was found in OVN (Open Virtual Network). A remote attacker, by sending crafted DHCPv6 (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6) SOLICIT packets with an inflated Client ID length, could cause the ovn-controller to read beyond the bounds of a packet. This out-of-bounds read can lead to the disclosure of sensitive information stored in heap memory, which is then returned to the attacker's virtual machine port.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Fast Datapath for RHEL 8Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Fast Datapath for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Fast Datapath for RHEL 8Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Fast Datapath for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Fast Datapath for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-130
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found