Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-56820

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-21 Jul, 2026 | 22:26
Updated At-24 Jul, 2026 | 20:12
Rejected At-
Credits

Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:21 Jul, 2026 | 22:26
Updated At:24 Jul, 2026 | 20:12
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

Affected Products
Vendor
The Netty Projectnetty
Product
netty
Versions
Affected
  • >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final
  • < 4.1.136.Final
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:21 Jul, 2026 | 23:17
Updated At:24 Jul, 2026 | 21:16

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
N/A
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: N/A
Version:
Base score:
Base severity: N/A
Vector:
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003bsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6security-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Finalsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Finalsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwgsecurity-advisories@github.com
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

118Records found

CVE-2026-7821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 40.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-07 May, 2026 | 20:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to enroll a device belonging to a restricted set of unenrolled devices, leading to information disclosure about EPMM appliance and impacting on the integrity of the newly enrolled device identity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-endpoint_manager_mobileEndpoint Manager Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-6900
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.14% / 3.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 09:53
Updated-06 Jul, 2026 | 19:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation

Improper certificate validation vulnerability in B&R Industrial Automation GmbH APROL. This issue affects APROL: before R 4.4-01P5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-APROL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-6032
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 41.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Dec, 2019 | 15:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The NTV News24 prior to Ver.3.0.0 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ntvNippon Television Network Corporation
Product-news_24NTV News24
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-6687
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 38.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Dec, 2019 | 17:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On versions 15.0.0-15.0.1.1, the BIG-IP ASM Cloud Security Services profile uses a built-in verification mechanism that fails to properly authenticate the X.509 certificate of remote endpoints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP ASM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-29887
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 20.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2024 | 18:46
Updated-19 Dec, 2025 | 18:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Serverpod client accepts any certificate

Serverpod is an app and web server, built for the Flutter and Dart ecosystem. This bug bypassed the validation of TSL certificates on all none web HTTP clients in the `serverpod_client` package. Making them susceptible to a man in the middle attack against encrypted traffic between the client device and the server. An attacker would need to be able to intercept the traffic and highjack the connection to the server for this vulnerability to be used. Upgrading to version `1.2.6` resolves this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-serverpodserverpodserverpod
Product-serverpodserverpodserverpod
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-53475
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 16.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:55
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 14:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Assisted-migration-agent: tls verification disabled on all vcenter connections

A flaw was found in assisted-migration-agent. The application hardcodes insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections when communicating with vCenter. This vulnerability allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to intercept and harvest vCenter administrator credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access to vCenter.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kubev2v
Product-assisted_migration_agent
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-24461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2023 | 14:31
Updated-29 Jan, 2025 | 21:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS vulnerability

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.Microsoft CorporationF5, Inc.
Product-windowsbig-ip_access_policy_managermacosBIG-IP Edge Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 42.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2024 | 02:44
Updated-08 May, 2025 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in SAP Cloud Connector

Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-cloud_connectorSAP Cloud Connector
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3685
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 49.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Nov, 2019 | 09:30
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing TLS certificate validation for HTTPS connections in osc

Open Build Service before version 0.165.4 diddn't validate TLS certificates for HTTPS connections with the osc client binary

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open Build ServiceopenSUSE
Product-open_build_serviceOpen Build Service
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 23.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1748
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.18% / 64.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2019 | 23:50
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Network Plug-and-Play Agent Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Network Plug-and-Play (PnP) agent of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability exists because the affected software insufficiently validates certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt and modify confidential information on user connections to the affected software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ios_xeiosCisco IOS and IOS XE Software
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-54919
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.98%
||
7 Day CHG-0.10%
Published-10 Jul, 2026 | 16:06
Updated-14 Jul, 2026 | 05:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
cpp-httplib: TLS certificate chain verification bypassed for IP-literal hosts on Mbed TLS and wolfSSL backends

cpp-httplib is a C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library. In affected Mbed TLS backend versions from 0.31.0 through 0.46.1 and wolfSSL backend versions from 0.33.0 through 0.46.1, when cpp-httplib is built with CPPHTTPLIB_MBEDTLS_SUPPORT or CPPHTTPLIB_WOLFSSL_SUPPORT and a client connects to an IP-literal host with server certificate verification enabled, SSLClient and Client in HTTPS mode skip certificate chain validation and WebSocketClient on the Mbed TLS backend skips verification altogether, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker positioned to intercept traffic to present a crafted certificate and read or modify the traffic. This issue is fixed in version 0.47.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yhiroseyhirose
Product-cpp-httplibcpp-httplib
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1683
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.87% / 55.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Feb, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5x5 Series IP Phones Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate handling component of the Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5X5 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to listen to or control some aspects of a Transport Level Security (TLS)-encrypted Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) conversation. The vulnerability is due to the improper validation of server certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious server certificate to present to the client. An exploit could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on TLS-encrypted traffic and potentially route or redirect calls initiated by an affected device. Affected software include version 7.6.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP Phones and version 1.4.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP Phones.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-spa501g_firmwarespa525g_firmwarespa512gspa500spa525gspa512g_firmwarespa525spa508gspa500s_firmwarespa525_firmwarespa502g_firmwarespa501gspa502gspa5x5spa500sspa509gspa500dsspa504g_firmwarespa112_firmwarespa5x5_firmwarespa509g_firmwarespa508g_firmwarespa112spa514g_firmwarespa514gspa500_firmwarespa500ds_firmwarespa504gCisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16209
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 50.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Nov, 2019 | 17:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability, in The ReportsTrustManager class of Brocade SANnav versions before v2.0, could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against Secure Sockets Layer(SSL)connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (Broadcom Inc.)Broadcom Inc.
Product-brocade_sannavBrocade SANnav
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16263
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.03% / 60.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Oct, 2019 | 11:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Twitter Kit framework through 3.4.2 for iOS does not properly validate the api.twitter.com SSL certificate. Although the certificate chain must contain one of a set of pinned certificates, there are certain implementation errors such as a lack of hostname verification. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twittern/a
Product-twitter_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-14823
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.86% / 54.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Oct, 2019 | 19:35
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the "Leaf and Chain" OCSP policy implementation in JSS' CryptoManager versions after 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.0, where it implicitly trusted the root certificate of a certificate chain. Applications using this policy may not properly verify the chain and could be vulnerable to attacks such as Man in the Middle.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jss_cryptomanager_projectDogtagLinux Kernel Organization, IncRed Hat, Inc.
Product-enterprise_linux_serverlinux_kernelenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linux_workstationenterprise_linuxenterprise_linux_eusjss_cryptomanagerenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_desktopJSS
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-55581
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 20.11%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When AdaCore Ada Web Server 25.0.0 is linked with GnuTLS, the default behaviour of AWS.Client is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack because of lack of verification of an HTTPS server's certificate (unless the using program specifies a TLS configuration).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-adacoren/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ada_web_serverdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-55436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.62%
||
7 Day CHG-0.10%
Published-08 Jul, 2026 | 00:26
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 19:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Coder's AI Bridge Proxy skips TLS certificate verification in default configuration

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.30.0 and prior to versions 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the AI Bridge Proxy (`aibridgeproxyd`) created a goproxy server whose default transport set `InsecureSkipVerify: true` and only assigned a secure transport when an upstream proxy was configured. In the default configuration (no upstream proxy), outbound HTTPS to the Coder access URL accepted any TLS certificate. Practical exploitation requires an on-path (man-in-the-middle) position between the AI Bridge Proxy and the Coder server. Deployments where they are co-located over loopback are effectively unaffected. The fix in versions 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 applies the secure transport (TLS 1.2 or higher using system root CAs) unconditionally. As a workaround, ensure the Coder access URL uses a trusted certificate and secure the network path between the AI Bridge Proxy and the Coder server (for example, loopback or mTLS).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-codercoder
Product-codercoder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12098
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.98% / 78.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 May, 2019 | 22:41
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 21:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In the client side of Heimdal before 7.6.0, failure to verify anonymous PKINIT PA-PKINIT-KX key exchange permits a man-in-the-middle attack. This issue is in krb5_init_creds_step in lib/krb5/init_creds_pw.c.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxleapbackports_slefedoraheimdaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6056
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.68%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:31
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Self-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11164)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of self-signed certificates. The product is found to trust certificates signed with the RIPEMD-160 hashing algorithm without proper validation, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 30.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 16:02
Updated-06 Jun, 2026 | 04:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in GitLab

An improper certificate validation issue in Smartcard authentication in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.6 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows an attacker to authenticate as another user given their public key if they use Smartcard authentication. Smartcard authentication is an experimental feature and has to be manually enabled by an administrator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6055
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 14.45%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:17
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11158)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software fails to properly validate website certificates. Specifically, if a site certificate lacks the "Server Authentication" specification in the Extended Key Usage extension, the product does not verify the certificate's compliance with the site, deeming such certificates as valid. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11688
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.10% / 62.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 14:58
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ASUSTOR exFAT Driver through 1.0.0.r20. When conducting license validation, exfat.cgi and exfatctl accept any certificate for asustornasapi.asustor.com. In other words, there is Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aASUSTOR Inc.
Product-exfat_drivern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-10091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.38% / 69.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 13:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-geodeApache Geode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6057
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.68%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:38
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of DSA-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11166)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of certificates issued using the DSA signature algorithm. The product does not properly check the certificate chain, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites using a DSA-signed certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 41.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-31 Mar, 2025 | 16:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in pyload/pyload

Improper Certificate Validation in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev44.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pyload-ng_projectpyloadpyload
Product-pyload-ngpyloadpyload/pyload
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.59% / 44.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2026-50752
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.55% / 90.58%
||
7 Day CHG-0.31%
Published-08 Jun, 2026 | 11:00
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 07:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Validation Bypass in VPN Site-to-Site Connections Using IKEv1

A weakness in the certificate validation logic of the deprecated IKEv1 key exchange may allow an unauthenticated attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to bypass certificate validation in VPN site-to-site connections that use certificate-based authentication. Successful exploitation could allow interception or modification of traffic traversing the VPN tunnel.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Product-Quantum Security GatewaySpark Firewalls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-12765
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PostgreSQL
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PostgreSQL
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 9.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2025 | 13:00
Updated-19 Nov, 2025 | 21:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
pgAdmin 4: LDAP authentication flow vulnerable to TLS certificate verification bypass.

pgAdmin <= 9.9  is affected by a vulnerability in the LDAP authentication mechanism allows bypassing TLS certificate verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pgadminpgadmin.org
Product-pgadmin_4pgAdmin 4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11043
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 10.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2026 | 15:52
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Server Certificate Validation in Automation Studio

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the OPC-UA client and ANSL over TLS client used in Automation Studio versions before 6.5 could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the network to position themselves to intercept and interfere with data exchanges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-B&R Automation Studio
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-49570
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 08:07
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Basic Constraints certificate in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11210)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software trusts a certificate issued by an entity that isn't authorized to issue certificates. This occurs when the "Basic Constraints" extension in the certificate indicates that it is meant to be an "End Entity”. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39948
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 19.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 18:06
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiproxyfortiosFortiOSFortiProxy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-28021
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 18.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2024 | 13:30
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server that affects the message queueing mechanism’s certificate validation. If exploited an attacker could spoof a trusted entity causing a loss of confidentiality and integrity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-foxman-unfoxman_ununemFOXMAN-UNUNEMfoxman-ununem
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-40147
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 26.95%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 12:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Management (All versions < V1.5.1). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-industrial_edge_managementIndustrial Edge Management
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-7383
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 31.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Aug, 2024 | 13:19
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Libnbd: nbd server improper certificate validation

A flaw was found in libnbd. The client did not always correctly verify the NBD server's certificate when using TLS to connect to an NBD server. This issue allows a man-in-the-middle attack on NBD traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced VirtualizationRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-24 Jul, 2026 | 11:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 does not verify TLS certificates on outbound HTTPS connections. The execute_web_request_secure() function in src/fast_library.cpp creates a boost::asio::ssl::context with tls_client mode and calls set_default_verify_paths() to load CA certificates, but never calls set_verify_mode(boost::asio::ssl::verify_peer). Without this call, OpenSSL performs the TLS handshake without validating the server's certificate chain, making all HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. This function is used for telemetry reporting to community-stats.fastnetmon.com, which sends system information including CPU model, kernel version, traffic statistics, and software configuration. An attacker can intercept and modify this data or redirect it to a malicious server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pavel-odintsovn/a
Product-fastnetmonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 39.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2021 | 11:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_manage_mytoolssinumerik_manage_myprogramssinumerik_integrate_clientsinumerik_analyse_myconditionsinumerik_manage_myresources_firmwaresinumerik_analyse_mycondition_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mytools_firmwaresinumerik_optimize_myprogramming_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mymachinessinumerik_optimize_myprogrammingsinumerik_analyze_myperformance_firmwaresinumerik_analyze_myperformancesinumerik_integrate_client_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_productionsinumerik_manage_myresourcessinumerik_manage_mymachines_firmwaresinumerik_operate_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_production_firmwaresinumerik_operatesinumerik_manage_myprograms_firmwareSINUMERIK Analyse MyConditionSINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-TuningSINUMERIK Operate V4.94SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel MonitorSINUMERIK Integrate Client 02SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam EditorSINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ToolsSINUMERIK Manage MyMachinesSINUMERIK Operate V4.93SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformanceSINUMERIK Operate V4.8SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-MonitorSINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /RemoteSINUMERIK Manage MyProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate Client 04SINUMERIK Manage MyTools
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-54848
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 22.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-02 Oct, 2025 | 16:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper handling and storage of certificates in CP Plus CP-VNR-3104 B3223P22C02424 allow attackers to decrypt communications or execute a man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCP PLUS (Aditya Group - Aditya Infotech Limited)
Product-cp-vnr-3104cp-vnr-3104_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5822
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 45.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The contribution feature in Zamboni does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to use of the Python urllib2 library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-zambonin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52330
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.34% / 26.52%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic, possibly modifying firmware updates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-deebot_x1s_pro_plusdeebot_x5_pro_ultradeebot_x1_turbodeebot_x1_omnideebot_x5_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_firmwaredeebot_t10_firmwaredeebot_x2_omnideebot_x1_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omnideebot_t10_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1_firmwaredeebot_x2sdeebot_x2_combodeebot_t10_plus_firmwaredeebot_x2_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1deebot_t10_plusdeebot_x1_pro_omnideebot_x2_combo_firmwaredeebot_t10_turbodeebot_x1_pro_omni_firmwaremate_xdeebot_x5_pro_ultra_firmwaredeebot_x5_pro_firmwaredeebot_x5_prodeebot_x2_pro_firmwaremate_x_firmwaredeebot_x2_prodeebot_x5_pro_plusdeebot_x2s_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omnideebot_x1_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_plusdeebot_x1s_prodeebot_t10DEEBOT X1 TURBODEEBOT T10 OMNIDEEBOT T10 TURBODEEBOT T10 PLUSDEEBOT X2 PRODEEBOT X5 PRODEEBOT X1 PRO OMNIDEEBOT X1 PLUSDEEBOT X2 OMNIMate XDEEBOT X2SDEEBOT X5 PRO ULTRADEEBOT X5 PRO PLUSDEEBOT X1S PRODEEBOT X1S PRO PLUSDEEBOT T10DEEBOT X1 OMNIDEEBOT X1DEEBOT X2 COMBODEEBOT X1e OMNI
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52329
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 29.76%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins for specific robots do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic and obtain authentication tokens.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-homeECOVACS HOME
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 50.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-50691
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SunGrow iSolarCloud Android app V2.1.6.20241104 and prior suffers from Missing SSL Certificate Validation. The app explicitly ignores certificate errors and is vulnerable to MiTM attacks. Attackers can impersonate the iSolarCloud server and communicate with the Android app.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sungrowpowern/a
Product-isolarcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.76% / 51.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 62.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-09 Jun, 2026 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-45389
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 9.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-17 Jun, 2026 | 15:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-44393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-22 Jul, 2026 | 20:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in OpenStack oslo.messaging 1.0.0 through 17.3.0. The oslo.messaging RabbitMQ driver does not perform TLS hostname verification when connecting to the message broker. When ssl_ca_file is configured, the driver enables certificate chain validation but does not pass the expected broker hostname into the underlying TLS stack. Any certificate signed by the deployment CA is accepted regardless of hostname, allowing an attacker who can intercept control-plane traffic to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker and perform a man-in-the-middle attack on RPC and notification traffic. All OpenStack services using oslo.messaging with RabbitMQ over TLS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2022-2996
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 40.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the python-scciclient when making an HTTPS connection to a server where the server's certificate would not be verified. This issue opens up the connection to possible Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-python-scciclient_projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-python-scciclientdebian_linuxpython-scciclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42790
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
CVSS Score-7.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 26.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 May, 2026 | 15:09
Updated-24 Jul, 2026 | 15:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in public_key hostname verification

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_cert and public_key modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification. Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com): First, pubkey_cert:validate_names/6 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_cert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName. Second, public_key:pkix_verify_hostname/3 in lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkix_verify_hostname_match_fun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback. The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verify_peer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher. This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 29.0.1, OTP 28.5.0.1, OTP 27.3.4.12 and OTP 26.2.5.21, corresponding to public_key from 1.4 before 1.21.1, 1.20.3.1, 1.17.1.3 and 1.15.1.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-erlangErlangRed Hat, Inc.
Product-erlang\/otpOTPRed Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2022-27890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 13.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-palantirPalantir
Product-atlasdbAtlasDB
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found