Buffer Overflow in Netgear R8000 Router with firmware v1.0.4.56 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted POST to '/bd_genie_create_account.cgi' with a sufficiently long parameter 'register_country'.

Pillow through 8.2.0 and PIL (aka Python Imaging Library) through 1.1.7 allow an attacker to pass controlled parameters directly into a convert function to trigger a buffer overflow in Convert.c.

A vulnerability in the vDaemon process in Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a buffer overflow on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient bounds checking when an affected device processes traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted traffic to the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a buffer overflow and possibly execute arbitrary commands with root-level privileges, or cause the device to reload, which could result in a denial of service condition.

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GetValue functionality of TCL LinkHub Mesh Wi-Fi MS1G_00_01.00_14. A specially-crafted configuration value can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can modify a configuration value to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability represents all occurances of the buffer overflow vulnerability within the cfm binary.

A flaw was found in libmicrohttpd. A missing bounds check in the post_process_urlencoded function leads to a buffer overflow, allowing a remote attacker to write arbitrary data in an application that uses libmicrohttpd. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. Only version 0.9.70 is vulnerable.

A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 relays with CPU variants CP050 (All versions < V8.80), SIPROTEC 5 relays with CPU variants CP100 (All versions < V8.80), SIPROTEC 5 relays with CPU variants CP300 (All versions < V8.80). Specially crafted packets sent to port 4443/tcp could cause a Denial-of-Service condition or potential remote code execution.

Tenda FH1202 v1.2.0.14(408) has a stack overflow vulnerability in the security parameter of the formWifiBasicSet function.

Tenda AX1803 v1.0.0.1 contains a stack overflow via the serviceName parameter in the function fromAdvSetMacMtuWan.

Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-mini v1.2.9 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the vpn_client_ip parameter at /apply.cgi.

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in NEXTU FLATA AX1500 Router v.1.0.2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the POST request handler component.

Buffer overflow in pngpread.c in libpng before 1.2.44 and 1.4.x before 1.4.3, as used in progressive applications, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PNG image that triggers an additional data row.

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in TOTOLink X5000R V9.1.0u.6118-B20201102 and A7000R V9.1.0u.6115-B20201022, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and cause a denial of service (DoS) via the IP field.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution.

D-Link DIR-820L 1.05B03 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the sub_451208 function.

Buffer Overflow vulnerability LINKSYS EA7500 3.0.1.207964 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP request to the IGD UPnP.

LookupCol.c in X.Org X through X11R7.7 and libX11 before 1.7.1 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The libX11 XLookupColor request (intended for server-side color lookup) contains a flaw allowing a client to send color-name requests with a name longer than the maximum size allowed by the protocol (and also longer than the maximum packet size for normal-sized packets). The user-controlled data exceeding the maximum size is then interpreted by the server as additional X protocol requests and executed, e.g., to disable X server authorization completely. For example, if the victim encounters malicious terminal control sequences for color codes, then the attacker may be able to take full control of the running graphical session.

TOTOLINK AC1200 T8 v4.1.5cu.861_B20230220 has a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setWiFiAclRules function via the desc parameter.

A buffer-overread issue was discovered in StringIO 3.0.1, as distributed in Ruby 3.0.x through 3.0.6 and 3.1.x through 3.1.4. The ungetbyte and ungetc methods on a StringIO can read past the end of a string, and a subsequent call to StringIO.gets may return the memory value. 3.0.3 is the main fixed version; however, for Ruby 3.0 users, a fixed version is stringio 3.0.1.1, and for Ruby 3.1 users, a fixed version is stringio 3.0.1.2.

Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in azerothcore azerothcore-wotlk (deps/zlib modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files inflate.C. This issue affects azerothcore-wotlk: through v4.0.0.

Meltytech Shotcut 25.10.31 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. A memory access violation occurs when processing MLT project files with manipulated width and height parameters. By setting these values to extremely large numbers, the application attempts to allocate excessive memory during image processing, triggering a buffer overflow in the mlt_image_fill_white function.

Buffer overflow in WinSCP 5.17.8 allows a malicious FTP server to cause a denial of service or possibly have other unspecified impact via a long file name.

Multiple Buffer overflows in the MMS Client in MZ Automation LibIEC61850 before commit 1f52be9ddeae00e69cd43e4cac3cb4f0c880c4f0 allow a malicious server to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via the MMS IdentifyResponse message.

TOTOLINK AC1200 T8 v4.1.5cu.861_B20230220 has a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setWizardCfg function via the ssid5g parameter.

Tenda AC8v4 V16.03.34.06 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the fromAdvSetMacMtuWan function.

Extreme Networks IQ Engine before 10.6r1a, and through 10.6r4 before 10.6r5, has a buffer overflow. This issue arises from the ah_webui service, which listens on TCP port 3009 by default.

Tenda AX1806 v1.0.0.1 contains a stack overflow via the iptv.city.vlan parameter in the function setIptvInfo.

A flaw was found in the gstreamer h264 component of gst-plugins-bad before v1.18.1 where when parsing a h264 header, an attacker could cause the stack to be smashed, memory corruption and possibly code execution.

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GetValue functionality of TCL LinkHub Mesh Wi-Fi MS1G_00_01.00_14. A specially-crafted configuration value can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can modify a configuration value to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability represents all occurances of the buffer overflow vulnerability within the multiWAN binary.

SuperScan v4.1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the Hostname/IP parameter.

In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before 6.4.0, if an attacker can control parameters of __portable_aligned_alloc() could cause an integer wrap-around and an allocation smaller than expected. This could cause subsequent heap buffer overflows.

There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying CLI service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Frhed hex editor, affecting version 1.6.0. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a long filename argument through the Structured Exception Handler (SEH) registers.

aom_dsp/noise_model.c in libaom in AOMedia before 2021-03-24 has a buffer overflow.

There are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying CLI service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.

An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow.

There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the underlying AirWave client service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.

A Buffer overflow vulnerability in DreamSecurity MagicLine4NX versions 1.0.0.1 to 1.0.0.26 allows an attacker to remotely execute code.

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GetValue functionality of TCL LinkHub Mesh Wi-Fi MS1G_00_01.00_14. A specially-crafted configuration value can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can modify a configuration value to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability represents all occurances of the buffer overflow vulnerability within the cwmpd binary.

The rad_packet_recv function in radius/packet.c suffers from a memcpy buffer overflow, resulting in an overly-large recvfrom into a fixed buffer that causes a buffer overflow and overwrites arbitrary memory. If the server connects with a malicious client, crafted client requests can remotely trigger this vulnerability.

A vulnerability was found in UTT 进取 750W up to 5.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/setSysAdm of the component API. The manipulation of the argument passwd1 leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Memory corruption while parsing qcp clip with invalid chunk data size.

General Device Manager 2.5.2.2 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.

A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS (All versions < V10.4.4). Ptmcast executable used for testing cache validation service in affected application is vulnerable to Structured Exception Handler (SEH) based buffer overflow. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target system or cause denial of service condition.

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. The `concat` built-in can write over the bounds of the memory buffer that was allocated for it and thus overwrite existing valid data. The root cause is that the `build_IR` for `concat` doesn't properly adhere to the API of copy functions (for `>=0.3.2` the `copy_bytes` function). A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The buffer overflow can result in the change of semantics of the contract. The overflow is length-dependent and thus it might go unnoticed during contract testing. However, certainly not all usages of concat will result in overwritten valid data as we require it to be in an internal function and close to the return statement where other memory allocations don't occur. This issue has been addressed in 0.4.0.

overkill has buffer overflow via long player names that can corrupt data on the server machine

Xerox Phaser 6510 before 64.65.51 and 64.59.11 (Bridge), WorkCentre 6515 before 65.65.51 and 65.59.11 (Bridge), VersaLink B400 before 37.65.51 and 37.59.01 (Bridge), B405 before 38.65.51 and 38.59.01 (Bridge), B600/B610 before 32.65.51 and 32.59.01 (Bridge), B605/B615 before 33.65.51 and 33.59.01 (Bridge), B7025/30/35 before 58.65.51 and 58.59.11 (Bridge), C400 before 67.65.51 and 67.59.01 (Bridge), C405 before 68.65.51 and 68.59.01 (Bridge), C500/C600 before 61.65.51 and 61.59.01 (Bridge), C505/C605 before 62.65.51 and 62.59.01 (Bridge), C7000 before 56.65.51 and 56.59.01 (Bridge), C7020/25/30 before 57.65.51 and 57.59.01 (Bridge), C8000/C9000 before 70.65.51 and 70.59.01 (Bridge), C8000W before 72.65.51 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through a buffer overflow in Web page parameter handling.