Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-24461

Summary
Assigner-f5
Assigner Org ID-9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab
Published At-03 May, 2023 | 14:31
Updated At-29 Jan, 2025 | 21:41
Rejected At-
Credits

BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS vulnerability

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:f5
Assigner Org ID:9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab
Published At:03 May, 2023 | 14:31
Updated At:29 Jan, 2025 | 21:41
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS vulnerability

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Affected Products
Vendor
F5, Inc.F5
Product
BIG-IP Edge Client
Platforms
  • Windows
  • MacOS
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 7.2.2 before 7.2.4.1 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

finder
F5 acknowledges Gianluca Palma of Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. for bringing this issue to our attention and following the highest standards of coordinated disclosure.
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539
Resource:
vendor-advisory
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:f5sirt@f5.com
Published At:03 May, 2023 | 15:15
Updated At:10 May, 2023 | 18:29

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Edge Client for Windows and macOS and may allow an attacker to impersonate a BIG-IP APM system.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CPE Matches

F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 7.2.2(inclusive) to 7.2.4.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 13.1.0(inclusive) to 13.1.5(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 14.1.0(inclusive) to 14.1.5(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 15.1.0(inclusive) to 15.1.8(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 16.1.0(inclusive) to 16.1.3(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
F5, Inc.
f5
>>big-ip_access_policy_manager>>Versions from 17.0.0(inclusive) to 17.1.0(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Apple Inc.
apple
>>macos>>-
cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Microsoft Corporation
microsoft
>>windows>>-
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primaryf5sirt@f5.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: f5sirt@f5.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539f5sirt@f5.com
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000132539
Source: f5sirt@f5.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

259Records found

CVE-2024-25642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2024 | 02:44
Updated-08 May, 2025 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in SAP Cloud Connector

Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-cloud_connectorSAP Cloud Connector
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25053
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jun, 2024 | 18:53
Updated-01 Aug, 2024 | 23:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Cognos Analytics improper certificate validation

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.0, 11.2.1, 11.2.2, 11.2.3, 11.2.4, 12.0.0, 12.0.1, and 12.0.2 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation when using the IBM Planning Analytics Data Source Connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between IBM Planning Analytics server and IBM Cognos Analytics server. IBM X-Force ID: 283364.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-cognos_analyticsCognos Analytics
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-40147
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 41.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 12:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Management (All versions < V1.5.1). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-industrial_edge_managementIndustrial Edge Management
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39948
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 18:06
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiproxyfortiosFortiOSFortiProxy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-37437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.97%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-16 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ingest Actions UI in Splunk Enterprise 9.0.0 disabled TLS certificate validation

When using Ingest Actions to configure a destination that resides on Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) in Splunk Web, TLS certificate validation is not correctly performed and tested for the destination. The vulnerability only affects connections between Splunk Enterprise and an Ingest Actions Destination through Splunk Web and only applies to environments that have configured TLS certificate validation. It does not apply to Destinations configured directly in the outputs.conf configuration file. The vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise version 9.0.0 and does not affect versions below 9.0.0, including the 8.1.x and 8.2.x versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 07:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-universal_forwardersplunkSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-2402
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.68% / 85.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2017 | 22:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OkHttp before 2.7.4 and 3.x before 3.1.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass certificate pinning by sending a certificate chain with a certificate from a non-pinned trusted CA and the pinned certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-squareupn/a
Product-okhttpokhttp3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1184
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Tokyo Star bank App for Android before 1.4 and Tokyo Star bank App for iOS before 1.4 do not validate SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tokyostarbankn/a
Product-tokyo_star_bankn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Debian GNU/Linux
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Debian GNU/Linux
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-5.96% / 90.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The apt package in Debian jessie before 1.0.9.8.4, in Debian unstable before 1.4~beta2, in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS before 1.0.1ubuntu2.17, in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS before 1.2.15ubuntu0.2, and in Ubuntu 16.10 before 1.3.2ubuntu0.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a repository-signing protection mechanism by leveraging improper error handling when validating InRelease file signatures.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxadvanced_package_tooln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle Corporation
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsgraalvmmysql_enterprise_monitormysql_clustermysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44549
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server

Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_commons_messaging_mailApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44273
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Dec, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

e2guardian v5.4.x <= v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode (i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy), with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers that it connected to, and thus was itself vulnerable to MITM attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-e2bnn/a
Product-e2guardiann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6057
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 20.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:38
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of DSA-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11166)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of certificates issued using the DSA signature algorithm. The product does not properly check the certificate chain, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites using a DSA-signed certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-29.49% / 96.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2016 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMariaDB FoundationRed Hat, Inc.Fedora ProjectThe PHP GroupDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_server_ausmysql_connector\/centerprise_linux_eusfedoramariadbmysqlenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_workstationphpdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6056
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 17.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:31
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Self-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11164)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of self-signed certificates. The product is found to trust certificates signed with the RIPEMD-160 hashing algorithm without proper validation, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3547
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 13.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 10:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/a
Product-openvpnOpenVPN 3 Core Library
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6055
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:17
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11158)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software fails to properly validate website certificates. Specifically, if a site certificate lacks the "Server Authentication" specification in the Extended Key Usage extension, the product does not verify the certificate's compliance with the site, deeming such certificates as valid. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 66.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2021 | 14:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-windriverSonicWall Inc.FreeBSD FoundationFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.McAfee, LLCNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-freebsdpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsopensslnessus_agentsonicosmysql_connectorssantricity_smi-s_providerstoragegridnode.jsjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsgraalvmontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityfedorasma100_firmwarenessus_network_monitornessusweb_gatewayjd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementcloud_volumes_ontap_mediatorcapture_clientsma100linuxoncommand_workflow_automationmysql_workbenchsantricity_smi-s_provider_firmwareweblogic_serverstoragegrid_firmwaremysql_enterprise_monitorsecure_global_desktopemail_securityweb_gateway_cloud_servicesecure_backupcommerce_guided_searchmysql_serverOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-50949
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2024 | 16:54
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 22:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM QRadar improper certificate validation

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5 could allow an unauthorized user to perform unauthorized actions due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 275706.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-QRadar SIEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-2996
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the python-scciclient when making an HTTPS connection to a server where the server's certificate would not be verified. This issue opens up the connection to possible Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-python-scciclient_projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-python-scciclientdebian_linuxpython-scciclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-50178
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.99%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-09 Jul, 2024 | 15:33
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 16:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions and 6.0 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and various remote servers such as private SDN connectors and FortiToken Cloud.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiadcFortiADCfortiadc
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-49570
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 17.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 08:07
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Basic Constraints certificate in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11210)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software trusts a certificate issued by an entity that isn't authorized to issue certificates. This occurs when the "Basic Constraints" extension in the certificate indicates that it is meant to be an "End Entity”. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-48054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Nov, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL certificate validation in localstack v2.3.2 allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications between the host and server via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-localstackn/a
Product-localstackn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29504
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.85% / 73.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wp-cliwp-cli
Product-wp-cliwp-cli
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 5.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 16:02
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in GitLab

An improper certificate validation issue in Smartcard authentication in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.6 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows an attacker to authenticate as another user given their public key if they use Smartcard authentication. Smartcard authentication is an experimental feature and has to be manually enabled by an administrator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-48052
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Nov, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-14 Aug, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL certificate validation in HTTPie v3.2.2 allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications between the host and server via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-httpien/ahttpie
Product-httpien/ahttpie
CWE ID-CWE-599
Missing Validation of OpenSSL Certificate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 May, 2020 | 18:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by Missing SSL Certificate Validation. This affects R7000 1.0.9.6_1.2.19 through 1.0.11.100_10.2.10, and possibly R6120, R7800, R6220, R8000, R6350, R9000, R6400, RAX120, R6400v2, RBR20, R6800, XR300, R6850, XR500, and R7000P.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNETGEAR, Inc.
Product-r6350_firmwarer9000_firmwarer6120r6850_firmwarer6220_firmwarer8000r6800_firmwarexr300r6400_firmwarer7000pr6120_firmwarer9000rbr20r6800xr300_firmwarer7800rax120_firmwarer6850r6350r6220rbr20_firmwarexr500_firmwarer7800_firmwarer6400rax120xr500r8000_firmwarer7000p_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.62%
||
7 Day CHG+0.18%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5817
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Codehaus XFire 1.2.6 and earlier, as used in the Amazon EC2 API Tools Java library and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-codehausamazonn/a
Product-ec2_api_tools_java_libraryxfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13163
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2020 | 21:22
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

em-imap 0.5 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library. The hostname in a TLS server certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-em-imap_projectn/a
Product-em-imapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-26911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2021 | 20:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-canarymaillibmailcoren/a
Product-canary_mailmailcore2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13482
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2020 | 21:49
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EM-HTTP-Request 1.1.5 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library. The hostname in a TLS server certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-em-http-request_projectn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraem-http-requestn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-47700
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 8.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Feb, 2024 | 16:20
Updated-22 Aug, 2024 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Storage Virtualize improper certificate validation

IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM FlashSystem and IBM Storage Virtualize 8.6 products could allow a remote attacker to spoof a trusted system that would not be correctly validated by the Storwize server. This could lead to a user connecting to a malicious host, believing that it was a trusted system and deceived into accepting spoofed data. IBM X-Force ID: 271016.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-storage_virtualizeStorage Virtualize
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-11617
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Aug, 2020 | 14:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The RSS application on THOMSON THT741FTA 2.2.1 and Philips DTR3502BFTA DVB-T2 2.2.1 set-top boxes doesn't validate the SSL certificates of RSS servers, which allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to modify the data delivered to the client.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-thomsonstbn/aPhilips
Product-tht741fta_firmwaretht741ftadtr3502bfta_dvb-t2dtr3502bfta_dvb-t2_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.36% / 57.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2021 | 15:49
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nextcloud Desktop Client before 3.3.1 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation due to lack of SSL certificate verification when using the "Register with a Provider" flow.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxNextcloud GmbH
Product-desktopdebian_linuxNextcloud Desktop Client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-4586
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 10:46
Updated-23 Nov, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Hotrod-client: hot rod client does not enable hostname validation when using tls that lead to a mitm attack

A vulnerability was found in the Hot Rod client. This security issue occurs as the Hot Rod client does not enable hostname validation when using TLS, possibly resulting in a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-infinispanRed Hat, Inc.
Product-data_gridhot_rodRed Hat Data Grid 8.4.6
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 27.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-palantirPalantir
Product-atlasdbAtlasDB
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-8167
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2019 | 16:11
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 13:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

vdsm and vdsclient does not validate certficate hostname from another vdsm which could facilitate a man-in-the-middle attack

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vdsm and vdsclientRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vdscliententerprise_virtualizationvirtual_desktop_server_managervdsm and vdsclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-20833
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Oct, 2021 | 08:31
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The SNKRDUNK Market Place App for iOS versions prior to 2.2.0 does not verify server certificate properly, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to eavesdrop on and/or alter encrypted communication via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-soda-incSODA, Inc.
Product-snkrdunkSNKRDUNK Market Place App for iOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-21548
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 16.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2023 | 05:07
Updated-26 Feb, 2025 | 14:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax versions before 9.1.0.27, Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance versions before 9.1.0.27, and PowerMax OS Release 5978 contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim’s data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_unisphere_for_powermaxpowermax_osemc_unisphere_for_powermax_virtual_applianceUnisphere for PowerMax, Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance , PowerMax OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-0161
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 09:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ovirt-engine-sdk-python before 3.4.0.7 and 3.5.0.4 does not verify that the hostname of the remote endpoint matches the Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName as specified by its x.509 certificate in a TLS/SSL session. This could allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof remote endpoints via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovirt-engine-sdk-python_projectovirt-engine-sdk-python
Product-ovirt-engine-sdk-pythonovirt-engine-sdk-python
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-21373
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Mar, 2021 | 21:25
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nimble falls back to insecure http url when fetching packages

Nimble is a package manager for the Nim programming language. In Nim release versions before versions 1.2.10 and 1.4.4, "nimble refresh" fetches a list of Nimble packages over HTTPS by default. In case of error it falls back to a non-TLS URL http://irclogs.nim-lang.org/packages.json. An attacker able to perform MitM can deliver a modified package list containing malicious software packages. If the packages are installed and used the attack escalates to untrusted code execution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3230
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 61.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2020 | 15:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The libwww-perl LWP::Protocol::https module 6.04 through 6.06 for Perl, when using IO::Socket::SSL as the SSL socket class, allows attackers to disable server certificate validation via the (1) HTTPS_CA_DIR or (2) HTTPS_CA_FILE environment variable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lwp\libwww-perl
Product-\LWP::Protocol::https
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3685
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Nov, 2019 | 09:30
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing TLS certificate validation for HTTPS connections in osc

Open Build Service before version 0.165.4 diddn't validate TLS certificates for HTTPS connections with the osc client binary

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open Build ServiceopenSUSE
Product-open_build_serviceOpen Build Service
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-0104
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2020 | 16:54
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 09:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In fence-agents before 4.0.17 does not verify remote SSL certificates in the fence_cisco_ucs.py script which can potentially allow for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via arbitrary SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-clusterlabsfence-agents
Product-fence-agentsfence-agents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jun, 2021 | 03:05
Updated-23 Jul, 2025 | 15:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco DNA Center Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) integration feature of the Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to an incomplete validation of the X.509 certificate used when establishing a connection between DNA Center and an ISE server. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate and could then intercept communications between the ISE and DNA Center. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view and alter sensitive information that the ISE maintains about clients that are connected to the network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-catalyst_centerCisco Digital Network Architecture Center (DNA Center)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1566
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2021 | 17:45
Updated-07 Nov, 2024 | 22:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Web Security Appliance Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints integration of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept traffic between an affected device and the AMP servers. This vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation when an affected device establishes TLS connections. A man-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to spoof a trusted host and then extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-asyncosemail_security_applianceweb_security_applianceCisco Web Security Appliance (WSA)
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-19946
Matching Score-4
Assigner-QNAP Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-QNAP Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Sep, 2020 | 14:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 11:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The vulnerability have been reported to affect earlier versions of Helpdesk. If exploited, this improper certificate validation vulnerability could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client. QNAP has already fixed the issue in Helpdesk 3.0.3 and later.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-QNAP Systems, Inc.
Product-helpdeskHelpdesk
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2013-2255
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2019 | 18:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HTTPSConnections in OpenStack Keystone 2013, OpenStack Compute 2013.1, and possibly other OpenStack components, fail to validate server-side SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxOpenStackRed Hat, Inc.
Product-keystonedebian_linuxopenstackcomputeKeystoneCompute
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
Details not found