Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-50386

Summary
Assigner-apache
Assigner Org ID-f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At-12 Nov, 2024 | 14:34
Updated At-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:06
Rejected At-
Credits

Apache CloudStack: Directly downloaded templates can be used to abuse KVM-based infrastructure

Account users in Apache CloudStack by default are allowed to register templates to be downloaded directly to the primary storage for deploying instances. Due to missing validation checks for KVM-compatible templates in CloudStack 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.4 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.2, an attacker that can register templates, can use them to deploy malicious instances on KVM-based environments and exploit this to gain access to the host filesystems that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of KVM-based infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.5 or 4.19.1.3, or later, which addresses this issue. Additionally, all user-registered KVM-compatible templates can be scanned and checked that they are flat files that should not be using any additional or unnecessary features. For example, operators can run the following command on their file-based primary storage(s) and inspect the output. An empty output for the disk being validated means it has no references to the host filesystems; on the other hand, if the output for the disk being validated is not empty, it might indicate a compromised disk. However, bear in mind that (i) volumes created from templates will have references for the templates at first and (ii) volumes can be consolidated while migrating, losing their references to the templates. Therefore, the command execution for the primary storages can show both false positives and false negatives. for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info. If the output is not empty, that might indicate a compromised disk; check it carefully."; qemu-img info -U $file | grep file: ; printf "\n\n"; done For checking the whole template/volume features of each disk, operators can run the following command: for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info."; qemu-img info -U $file; printf "\n\n"; done

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:apache
Assigner Org ID:f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At:12 Nov, 2024 | 14:34
Updated At:12 Nov, 2024 | 20:06
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Apache CloudStack: Directly downloaded templates can be used to abuse KVM-based infrastructure

Account users in Apache CloudStack by default are allowed to register templates to be downloaded directly to the primary storage for deploying instances. Due to missing validation checks for KVM-compatible templates in CloudStack 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.4 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.2, an attacker that can register templates, can use them to deploy malicious instances on KVM-based environments and exploit this to gain access to the host filesystems that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of KVM-based infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.5 or 4.19.1.3, or later, which addresses this issue. Additionally, all user-registered KVM-compatible templates can be scanned and checked that they are flat files that should not be using any additional or unnecessary features. For example, operators can run the following command on their file-based primary storage(s) and inspect the output. An empty output for the disk being validated means it has no references to the host filesystems; on the other hand, if the output for the disk being validated is not empty, it might indicate a compromised disk. However, bear in mind that (i) volumes created from templates will have references for the templates at first and (ii) volumes can be consolidated while migrating, losing their references to the templates. Therefore, the command execution for the primary storages can show both false positives and false negatives. for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info. If the output is not empty, that might indicate a compromised disk; check it carefully."; qemu-img info -U $file | grep file: ; printf "\n\n"; done For checking the whole template/volume features of each disk, operators can run the following command: for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info."; qemu-img info -U $file; printf "\n\n"; done

Affected Products
Vendor
The Apache Software FoundationApache Software Foundation
Product
Apache CloudStack
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.4 (semver)
  • From 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.2 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Textual description of severity
text:
important
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

reporter
Kiran Chavala <kiranchavala@apache.org>
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/security-release-advisory-4.18.2.5-4.19.1.3
vendor-advisory
patch
https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0x83c2cyglzzdw8csbop7mj7h83z95y
mailing-list
https://www.shapeblue.com/shapeblue-security-advisory-apache-cloudstack-security-releases-4-18-2-5-and-4-19-1-3/
third-party-advisory
Hyperlink: https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/security-release-advisory-4.18.2.5-4.19.1.3
Resource:
vendor-advisory
patch
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0x83c2cyglzzdw8csbop7mj7h83z95y
Resource:
mailing-list
Hyperlink: https://www.shapeblue.com/shapeblue-security-advisory-apache-cloudstack-security-releases-4-18-2-5-and-4-19-1-3/
Resource:
third-party-advisory
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Vendor
The Apache Software Foundationapache
Product
cloudstack
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:cloudstack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.4 (semver)
  • From 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.2 (semver)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/3
N/A
Hyperlink: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/3
Resource: N/A
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@apache.org
Published At:12 Nov, 2024 | 15:15
Updated At:04 Feb, 2025 | 18:23

Account users in Apache CloudStack by default are allowed to register templates to be downloaded directly to the primary storage for deploying instances. Due to missing validation checks for KVM-compatible templates in CloudStack 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.4 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.2, an attacker that can register templates, can use them to deploy malicious instances on KVM-based environments and exploit this to gain access to the host filesystems that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of KVM-based infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.5 or 4.19.1.3, or later, which addresses this issue. Additionally, all user-registered KVM-compatible templates can be scanned and checked that they are flat files that should not be using any additional or unnecessary features. For example, operators can run the following command on their file-based primary storage(s) and inspect the output. An empty output for the disk being validated means it has no references to the host filesystems; on the other hand, if the output for the disk being validated is not empty, it might indicate a compromised disk. However, bear in mind that (i) volumes created from templates will have references for the templates at first and (ii) volumes can be consolidated while migrating, losing their references to the templates. Therefore, the command execution for the primary storages can show both false positives and false negatives. for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info. If the output is not empty, that might indicate a compromised disk; check it carefully."; qemu-img info -U $file | grep file: ; printf "\n\n"; done For checking the whole template/volume features of each disk, operators can run the following command: for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info."; qemu-img info -U $file; printf "\n\n"; done

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.18.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary3.19.9CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.9
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CPE Matches

The Apache Software Foundation
apache
>>cloudstack>>Versions from 4.0.0(inclusive) to 4.18.2.5(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:apache:cloudstack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
The Apache Software Foundation
apache
>>cloudstack>>Versions from 4.19.0.0(inclusive) to 4.19.1.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:apache:cloudstack:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-20Secondarysecurity@apache.org
NVD-CWE-noinfoPrimarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: security@apache.org
CWE ID: NVD-CWE-noinfo
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/security-release-advisory-4.18.2.5-4.19.1.3security@apache.org
Vendor Advisory
https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0x83c2cyglzzdw8csbop7mj7h83z95ysecurity@apache.org
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory
https://www.shapeblue.com/shapeblue-security-advisory-apache-cloudstack-security-releases-4-18-2-5-and-4-19-1-3/security@apache.org
Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/3af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Mailing List
Hyperlink: https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/security-release-advisory-4.18.2.5-4.19.1.3
Source: security@apache.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0x83c2cyglzzdw8csbop7mj7h83z95y
Source: security@apache.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.shapeblue.com/shapeblue-security-advisory-apache-cloudstack-security-releases-4-18-2-5-and-4-19-1-3/
Source: security@apache.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/3
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Mailing List

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

328Records found

CVE-2026-42811
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.43% / 35.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:37
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 13:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Polaris: could broaden vended GCS credentials through unescaped identifier content in access-boundary CEL conditions

In plain terms, Apache Polaris is supposed to issue short-lived GCS credentials that only work for one table's files, but a crafted namespace or table name can cause those credentials to work across the configured bucket instead. Apache Polaris builds Google Cloud Storage downscoped credentials by creating a Credential Access Boundary (CAB) with CEL conditions that are intended to restrict access to the requested table's storage path. The relevant CEL string is built from the bucket name and the table path. That table path is derived from namespace and table identifiers. In current code, that path appears to be inserted into the CEL expression without escaping. As a result, a namespace or table identifier containing a single quote and other URI-safe CEL fragments can break out of the intended quoted string and change the meaning of the CEL condition. In private testing against Polaris 1.4.0 on real Google Cloud Storage, it was confirmed that Polaris accepted a crafted identifier and returned delegated GCS credentials whose CEL path restriction had effectively collapsed. Those delegated credentials could then: - list another table's object prefix; - read another table's metadata control file (Iceberg metadata JSON); - create and delete an object under another table's object prefix; - and also list, read, create, and delete objects under an unrelated external prefix in the same bucket that was not part of any table path. That last point is important. The issue is not limited to "another table". In the confirmed setup, once Apache Polaris returned credentials for the crafted table, the path restriction inside the configured bucket was effectively gone. The practical effect is that temporary credentials for one crafted table can be broader than the table Polaris was asked to authorize, and can become effectively bucket-wide within the configured bucket. The current GCS testing used a Polaris principal with broad catalog privileges for setup. A separate least-privilege Polaris RBAC variant has not yet been tested on GCS. However, the storage-credential broadening behavior itself has been confirmed on GCS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-polarisApache Polaris
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CVE-2026-42809
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.36% / 28.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:22
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 13:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Polaris: staged table creation could vend storage credentials for unvalidated locations

Apache Polaris can issue broad temporary ("vended") storage credentials during staged table creation before the effective table location has been validated or durably reserved. Those temporary credentials are meant to limit the scope of accessible table data and metadata, but this scope limitation becomes attacker- directed because the attacker can choose a reachable target location. In the confirmed variant, if the caller supplies a custom `location` during stage create and requests credential vending, Apache Polaris uses that location to construct delegated storage credentials immediately. The stage-create path itself neither runs the normal location validation nor the overlap checks before those credentials are issued. Closely related to that, the staged-create flow also accepts `write.data.path` / `write.metadata.path` in the request properties and feeds those location overrides into the same effective table location set used for credential vending. Those fields are secondary to the main custom-`location` exploit, but they are still attacker-influenced location inputs that should be validated before any credentials are issued.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-polarisApache Polaris
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2026-42812
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.36% / 28.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:19
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Polaris: No protection on `write.metadata.path`

In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) bypasses the commit-time branch that is supposed to revalidate storage locations. The full persisted / credential-vending variant requires the affected catalog to have `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=true`, with `allowedLocations` broad enough to include the attacker-chosen target. `allowedLocations` is the admin-configured allowlist of storage paths that the catalog is allowed to use. Public project materials suggest that this flag is a real supported compatibility / layout mode, not just a contrived lab-only prerequisite. In that configuration, a user who can change table settings can cause Apache Polaris itself to write new table metadata to an attacker-chosen reachable storage location before the intended location-validation branch runs. If the later concrete-path validation also accepts that location, Polaris persists the resulting metadata path into stored table state. Later table-load and credential APIs can then return temporary cloud-storage credentials for the same location without revalidating it. In plain terms, Polaris can later hand out temporary storage access for the same attacker-chosen area. That attacker-chosen area does not need to be limited to the poisoned table's own files. If it is a broader storage prefix, another table's prefix, or, depending on configuration or provider behavior, even a bucket/container root, the resulting disclosure or corruption scope can extend to any data and metadata Polaris can reach there. The practical consequences are therefore similar to the staged-create credential-vending issue already discussed: data and metadata reachable in that storage scope can be exposed and, if write-capable credentials are later issued, modified, corrupted, or removed. Even before that later credential step, Polaris itself performs the metadata write to the unchecked location. So the core issue is not only later credential vending. The primary defect is that Polaris skips its intended location checks before performing a security- sensitive metadata write when only `write.metadata.path` changes. When `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=false`, current code review suggests the later `updateTableLike(...)` validation usually rejects out-of-tree metadata locations before the unsafe path is persisted. That may reduce the persisted / credential-vending variant, but it does not prevent the underlying defect: Polaris still skips the intended pre-write location check when only `write.metadata.path` changes.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-polarisApache Polaris
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control
CWE ID-CWE-732
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
CWE ID-CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2026-42810
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.42% / 34.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2026 | 16:48
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 13:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Polaris: could broaden vended S3 credentials through wildcard-bearing namespace or table names

Apache Polaris accepts literal `*` characters in namespace and table names. When it later builds temporary S3 access policies for delegated table access, those same characters appear to be reused unescaped in S3 IAM resource patterns and `s3:prefix` conditions. In S3 IAM policy matching, `*` is treated as a wildcard rather than as ordinary text. That means temporary credentials issued for one crafted table can match the storage path of a different table. In private testing against Polaris 1.4.0 using Polaris' AWS S3 temporary- credential path on both MinIO and real AWS S3, credentials returned for crafted tables such as `f*.t1`, `f*.*`, `*.*`, and `foo.*` could reach other tables' S3 locations. The confirmed behavior includes: - reading another table's metadata control file ([Iceberg metadata JSON]); - listing another table's exact S3 table prefix ([table prefix]); - and, when write delegation was returned for the crafted table, creating and deleting an object under another table's exact S3 table prefix. A control case using ordinary different names did not allow the same cross-table access. A least-privilege AWS S3 variant was also confirmed in which the attacker principal had no Polaris permissions on the victim table and only the minimal permissions required to create and use a crafted wildcard table (namespace-scoped `TABLE_CREATE` and `TABLE_WRITE_DATA` on `*`). In that setup, direct Polaris access to `foo.t1` remained forbidden, but the attacker could still create and load `*.*`, receive delegated S3 credentials, and use those credentials to list, read, create, and delete objects under `foo.t1`. In Iceberg, the metadata JSON file is a control file: it tells readers which data files belong to the table, which snapshots exist, and which table version to read. So unauthorized access to it is already a meaningful confidentiality problem. The confirmed write-capable variant means the issue is not limited to disclosure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-polarisApache Polaris
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-45219
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.23% / 65.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Oct, 2024 | 07:55
Updated-01 Jul, 2025 | 20:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CloudStack: Uploaded and registered templates and volumes can be used to abuse KVM-based infrastructure

Account users in Apache CloudStack by default are allowed to upload and register templates for deploying instances and volumes for attaching them as data disks to their existing instances. Due to missing validation checks for KVM-compatible templates or volumes in CloudStack 4.0.0 through 4.18.2.3 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.1, an attacker that can upload or register templates and volumes, can use them to deploy malicious instances or attach uploaded volumes to their existing instances on KVM-based environments and exploit this to gain access to the host filesystems that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of KVM-based infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.4 or 4.19.1.2, or later, which addresses this issue. Additionally, all user-uploaded or registered KVM-compatible templates and volumes can be scanned and checked that they are flat files that should not be using any additional or unnecessary features. For example, operators can run this on their secondary storage(s) and inspect output. An empty output for the disk being validated means it has no references to the host filesystems; on the other hand, if the output for the disk being validated is not empty, it might indicate a compromised disk. for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info. If the output is not empty, that might indicate a compromised disk; check it carefully."; qemu-img info -U $file | grep file: ; printf "\n\n"; done The command can also be run for the file-based primary storages; however, bear in mind that (i) volumes created from templates will have references for the templates at first and (ii) volumes can be consolidated while migrating, losing their references to the templates. Therefore, the command execution for the primary storages can show both false positives and false negatives. For checking the whole template/volume features of each disk, operators can run the following command: for file in $(find /path/to/storage/ -type f -regex [a-f0-9\-]*.*); do echo "Retrieving file [$file] info."; qemu-img info -U $file; printf "\n\n"; done

Action-Not Available
Vendor-apache_software_foundationThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-cloudstackApache CloudStackapache_cloudstack
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-27894
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.90% / 77.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2024 | 18:19
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar: Pulsar Functions Worker Allows Unauthorized File Access and Unauthorized HTTP/HTTPS Proxying

The Pulsar Functions Worker includes a capability that permits authenticated users to create functions where the function's implementation is referenced by a URL. The supported URL schemes include "file", "http", and "https". When a function is created using this method, the Functions Worker will retrieve the implementation from the URL provided by the user. However, this feature introduces a vulnerability that can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorized access to any file that the Pulsar Functions Worker process has permissions to read. This includes reading the process environment which potentially includes sensitive information, such as secrets. Furthermore, an attacker could leverage this vulnerability to use the Pulsar Functions Worker as a proxy to access the content of remote HTTP and HTTPS endpoint URLs. This could also be used to carry out denial of service attacks. This vulnerability also applies to the Pulsar Broker when it is configured with "functionsWorkerEnabled=true". This issue affects Apache Pulsar versions from 2.4.0 to 2.10.5, from 2.11.0 to 2.11.3, from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2, from 3.1.0 to 3.1.2, and 3.2.0. 2.10 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.10.6. 2.11 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.11.4. 3.0 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.0.3. 3.1 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.1.3. 3.2 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.2.1. Users operating versions prior to those listed above should upgrade to the aforementioned patched versions or newer versions. The updated versions of Pulsar Functions Worker will, by default, impose restrictions on the creation of functions using URLs. For users who rely on this functionality, the Function Worker configuration provides two configuration keys: "additionalEnabledConnectorUrlPatterns" and "additionalEnabledFunctionsUrlPatterns". These keys allow users to specify a set of URL patterns that are permitted, enabling the creation of functions using URLs that match the defined patterns. This approach ensures that the feature remains available to those who require it, while limiting the potential for unauthorized access and exploitation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-552
Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties
CVE-2024-27135
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.5||HIGH
EPSS-5.98% / 92.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2024 | 18:18
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 18:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar: Improper Input Validation in Pulsar Function Worker allows Remote Code Execution

Improper input validation in the Pulsar Function Worker allows a malicious authenticated user to execute arbitrary Java code on the Pulsar Function worker, outside of the sandboxes designated for running user-provided functions. This vulnerability also applies to the Pulsar Broker when it is configured with "functionsWorkerEnabled=true". This issue affects Apache Pulsar versions from 2.4.0 to 2.10.5, from 2.11.0 to 2.11.3, from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2, from 3.1.0 to 3.1.2, and 3.2.0. 2.10 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.10.6. 2.11 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.11.4. 3.0 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.0.3. 3.1 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.1.3. 3.2 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.2.1. Users operating versions prior to those listed above should upgrade to the aforementioned patched versions or newer versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsarpulsar
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-913
Improper Control of Dynamically-Managed Code Resources
CVE-2026-35563
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 8.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2026 | 07:12
Updated-22 Jul, 2026 | 07:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Directory LDAP API: LDAP client implementation does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP hostname

It was identified that the LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP hostname. While the underlying code validates the certificate chain against a trusted authority, the absence of endpoint identification allows a valid certificate issued for an entirely unrelated host to be improperly accepted. This oversight leaves the connection highly vulnerable to server impersonation and complete connection compromise. The root cause of this vulnerability lies in the incomplete TLS server identity verification within the LDAP client implementation. The attacker requires MITM capability on the network to exploit this vulnerability. This attacker must be able to present a certificate trusted by the client's configured trust store. The hostname verification has been enforced in the new version of the LDAP API

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-directory_ldap_apiApache Directory LDAP API
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2026-40453
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.86% / 54.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2026 | 08:23
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel JMS, Apache Camel CoAP, Apache Camel Google PubSub: Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-27636 in non-HTTP HeaderFilterStrategies (camel-jms, camel-sjms, camel-coap, camel-google-pubsub) allows case-variant header injection

The fix for CVE-2025-27636 added setLowerCase(true) to HttpHeaderFilterStrategy so that case-variant header names such as 'CAmelExecCommandExecutable' are filtered out alongside 'CamelExecCommandExecutable'. The same setLowerCase(true) call was not applied to five non-HTTP HeaderFilterStrategy implementations: JmsHeaderFilterStrategy and ClassicJmsHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-jms, SjmsHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-sjms, CoAPHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-coap, and GooglePubsubHeaderFilterStrategy in camel-google-pubsub. Because those strategies use case-sensitive String.startsWith('Camel'/'camel') filtering while the Camel Exchange stores headers in a case-insensitive map, an attacker with JMS (or equivalent) producer access to the broker consumed by a Camel route can inject case-variant Camel internal headers, which are then resolved by downstream components such as camel-exec and camel-file using their canonical casing. This enables remote code execution and arbitrary file write on routes that forward JMS messages to header-driven components. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.6, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 before 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.6. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel CoAPApache Camel Google PubSubApache Camel JMSRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14Red Hat Process Automation 7OpenShift ServerlessRed Hat Fuse 7Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8
CWE ID-CWE-178
Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
CVE-2024-45387
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-41.84% / 98.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Dec, 2024 | 15:30
Updated-11 Feb, 2025 | 16:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Traffic Control: SQL Injection in Traffic Ops endpoint PUT deliveryservice_request_comments

An SQL injection vulnerability in Traffic Ops in Apache Traffic Control <= 8.0.1, >= 8.0.0 allows a privileged user with role "admin", "federation", "operations", "portal", or "steering" to execute arbitrary SQL against the database by sending a specially-crafted PUT request. Users are recommended to upgrade to version Apache Traffic Control 8.0.2 if you run an affected version of Traffic Ops.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-traffic_controlApache Traffic Control
CWE ID-CWE-285
Improper Authorization
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CVE-2023-22946
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.11% / 62.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Apr, 2023 | 07:30
Updated-21 Oct, 2024 | 15:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Spark proxy-user privilege escalation from malicious configuration class

In Apache Spark versions prior to 3.4.0, applications using spark-submit can specify a 'proxy-user' to run as, limiting privileges. The application can execute code with the privileges of the submitting user, however, by providing malicious configuration-related classes on the classpath. This affects architectures relying on proxy-user, for example those using Apache Livy to manage submitted applications. Update to Apache Spark 3.4.0 or later, and ensure that spark.submit.proxyUser.allowCustomClasspathInClusterMode is set to its default of "false", and is not overridden by submitted applications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sparkApache Spark
CWE ID-CWE-269
Improper Privilege Management
CVE-2022-31764
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.67% / 48.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2025 | 14:23
Updated-16 Jul, 2025 | 01:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI allows RCE via event trace data source JDBC

The Lite UI of Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI allows an attacker to perform RCE by constructing a special JDBC URL of H2 database. This issue affects Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI version 3.0.1 and prior versions. This vulnerability has been fixed in ElasticJob-UI 3.0.2. The premise of this attack is that the attacker has obtained the account and password. Otherwise, the attacker cannot perform this attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-shardingsphere_elasticjob-uiApache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI
CWE ID-CWE-913
Improper Control of Dynamically-Managed Code Resources
CVE-2016-15057
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-3.73% / 88.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2026 | 11:29
Updated-27 Jan, 2026 | 20:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Continuum: Command injection leading to RCE

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Apache Continuum. This issue affects Apache Continuum: all versions. Attackers with access to the installations REST API can use this to invoke arbitrary commands on the server. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-continuumApache Continuum
CWE ID-CWE-77
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
CVE-2024-27317
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.4||HIGH
EPSS-56.93% / 98.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2024 | 18:18
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar: Pulsar Functions Worker's Archive Extraction Vulnerability Allows Unauthorized File Modification

In Pulsar Functions Worker, authenticated users can upload functions in jar or nar files. These files, essentially zip files, are extracted by the Functions Worker. However, if a malicious file is uploaded, it could exploit a directory traversal vulnerability. This occurs when the filenames in the zip files, which aren't properly validated, contain special elements like "..", altering the directory path. This could allow an attacker to create or modify files outside of the designated extraction directory, potentially influencing system behavior. This vulnerability also applies to the Pulsar Broker when it is configured with "functionsWorkerEnabled=true". This issue affects Apache Pulsar versions from 2.4.0 to 2.10.5, from 2.11.0 to 2.11.3, from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2, from 3.1.0 to 3.1.2, and 3.2.0. 2.10 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.10.6. 2.11 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 2.11.4. 3.0 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.0.3. 3.1 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.1.3. 3.2 Pulsar Function Worker users should upgrade to at least 3.2.1. Users operating versions prior to those listed above should upgrade to the aforementioned patched versions or newer versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsarpulsar
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2024-23673
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.32% / 67.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2024 | 10:04
Updated-09 May, 2025 | 16:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Sling Servlets Resolver: Malicious code execution via path traversal

Malicious code execution via path traversal in Apache Software Foundation Apache Sling Servlets Resolver.This issue affects all version of Apache Sling Servlets Resolver before 2.11.0. However, whether a system is vulnerable to this attack depends on the exact configuration of the system. If the system is vulnerable, a user with write access to the repository might be able to trick the Sling Servlet Resolver to load a previously uploaded script.  Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.0, which fixes this issue. It is recommended to upgrade, regardless of whether your system configuration currently allows this attack or not.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_servlets_resolverApache Sling Servlets Resolver
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2021-21345
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-72.32% / 99.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2021 | 23:40
Updated-23 May, 2025 | 17:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
XStream is vulnerable to a Remote Command Execution attack

XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker who has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-xstreamx-streamNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationFedora ProjectThe Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-xstreamcommunications_unified_inventory_managementcommunications_billing_and_revenue_management_elastic_charging_enginewebcenter_portaloncommand_insightpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsbanking_virtual_account_managementjmetercommunications_policy_managementactivemqretail_xstore_point_of_servicedebian_linuxbanking_enterprise_default_managementfedorabanking_platformbusiness_activity_monitoringxstream
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-66614
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 14.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2026 | 18:48
Updated-24 Mar, 2026 | 09:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat: Client certificate verification bypass due to virtual host mapping

Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected. Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field. The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate authentication is enforced at the web application. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-tomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-5209
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-9.06% / 94.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.24.1 allows remote attackers to manipulate Struts internals, alter user sessions, or affect container settings via vectors involving a top object.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-strutsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-47430
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.72% / 50.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2026 | 10:22
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 07:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cordova Plugin InAppBrowser: iOS: Arbitrary Cordova callback IDs can be dispatched without validation from InAppBrowser WebViews

## Summary The iOS implementation of `cordova-plugin-inappbrowser` passes the `id` field from a `WKScriptMessage` body to `commandDelegate sendPluginResult:callbackId:` with no format validation (`CDVWKInAppBrowser.m:560–574`). Any web content loaded inside the InAppBrowser can fire any pending Cordova callback in the host app by posting a message whose `id` field is a guessable or enumerated callback identifier. An attack abusing this weakness must be tailored to the specific plugins and callback IDs the host app uses. Though an attacker with knowledge of common Cordova plugin configurations could craft reusable payloads targeting widely-adopted plugins. ## Impact An unauthenticated remote attacker who controls content displayed in the InAppBrowser — via a URL the app opens (OAuth redirect, marketing link, deep-link target) or a network interception — can call `window.webkit.messageHandlers.cordova_iab.postMessage({id: '<victim-callback-id>', d: '...'})` to fire callbacks belonging to any other installed Cordova plugin (Camera, Contacts, File, Geolocation). Cordova callback IDs follow the predictable format `<PluginName><sequential-integer>`, making enumeration feasible. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to spoof plugin results across trust boundaries — for example, injecting a forged camera approval, a fabricated contacts list, or a crafted file-read response. This issue affects Cordova Plugin InAppBrowser: from 3.1.0 through 6.0.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.0.1, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cordova_inappbrowserCordova Plugin InAppBrowser
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-45648
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-5.85% / 92.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Oct, 2023 | 18:38
Updated-29 Oct, 2025 | 12:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat: Trailer header parsing too lenient

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.Tomcat from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M11, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.13, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.81 and from 8.5.0 through 8.5.93 did not correctly parse HTTP trailer headers. A specially crafted, invalid trailer header could cause Tomcat to treat a single request as multiple requests leading to the possibility of request smuggling when behind a reverse proxy. Older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M12 onwards, 10.1.14 onwards, 9.0.81 onwards or 8.5.94 onwards, which fix the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-debian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcattomcat
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-34693
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.57% / 72.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jun, 2024 | 08:51
Updated-21 Feb, 2025 | 16:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Superset: Server arbitrary file read

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Superset, allows for an authenticated attacker to create a MariaDB connection with local_infile enabled. If both the MariaDB server (off by default) and the local mysql client on the web server are set to allow for local infile, it's possible for the attacker to execute a specific MySQL/MariaDB SQL command that is able to read files from the server and insert their content on a MariaDB database table.This issue affects Apache Superset: before 3.1.3 and version 4.0.0 Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.1 or 3.1.3, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-supersetApache Superset
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2014-4651
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.06% / 79.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Feb, 2020 | 13:06
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 11:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that the jclouds scriptbuilder Statements class wrote a temporary file to a predictable location. An attacker could use this flaw to access sensitive data, cause a denial of service, or perform other attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-jcloudsApache jclouds
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2015-0252
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5||MEDIUM
EPSS-39.69% / 98.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2015 | 17:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

internal/XMLReader.cpp in Apache Xerces-C before 3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via crafted XML data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraxerces-c\+\+n/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-58624
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 13.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jul, 2026 | 20:27
Updated-21 Jul, 2026 | 18:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache MINA SSHD: Remote execution of JGit commands can write files on the server

Improper input validation in sshd-git in Apache MINA SSHD. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. Component org.apache.sshd:sshd-git provides though its GitPgmCommandFactory a way to configure an Apache MINA SSHD server such that SSH clients can remotely execute git commands via the JGit library on git repositories stored on the server. This GitPgmCommandFactory allowed a user authenticated via SSH to run any JGit command available, including commands that could write files at arbitrary places such as git archive with the --output option. Affected are SSH servers implemented with Apache MINA SSHD and using the GitPgmCommandFactory. If the GitPgmCommandFactory is not configured on the server, the server is not affected. It is recommended to upgrade affected servers to Apache MINA SSHD 2.19.0 or 3.0.0-M5, which fix this issue. The issue is fixed by restricting the available commands to a small whitelist of uncritical commands (such as git log). git archive is also allowed, but its --output argument is ignored and the archive is always sent through the SSH channel to the client.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache MINA SSHD
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2025-48913
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.79% / 52.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2025 | 09:21
Updated-26 Feb, 2026 | 17:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CXF: Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE

If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXF
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-37415
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-1.59% / 73.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2023 | 07:35
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow Apache Hive Provider: Improper Input Validation in Hive Provider with proxy_user

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow Apache Hive Provider. Patching on top of CVE-2023-35797 Before 6.1.2 the proxy_user option can also inject semicolon. This issue affects Apache Airflow Apache Hive Provider: before 6.1.2. It is recommended updating provider version to 6.1.2 in order to avoid this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-apache-hiveApache Airflow Apache Hive Providerapache-airflow-providers-apache-hive
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-55993
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 41.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:13
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 03:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Atmosphere Websocket: The inbound consumer maps externally-supplied WebSocket query parameters into the Exchange without a HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing injection of Camel control headers - enabling influencing internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Atmosphere Websocket Component. The camel-atmosphere-websocket consumer mapped inbound WebSocket query parameters into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (WebsocketConsumer.sendEventNotification() iterates the query-string map collected in WebsocketConsumer.service() and copies each entry into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, a client connecting to the WebSocket endpoint could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as query parameters. In a route where the WebSocket consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets. When the WebSocket endpoint is exposed without authentication, this is reachable by an unauthenticated remote attacker. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix makes the consumer apply the HeaderFilterStrategy it already inherits from the HTTP/servlet stack, filtering the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so externally-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from the inbound message before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), require authentication on the WebSocket endpoint, and avoid bridging an untrusted consumer directly into an HTTP producer whose target URI can be driven from message headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel Atmosphere Websocket
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-55994
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 32.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:13
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 03:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Iggy: The inbound consumer maps externally-supplied Iggy message user-headers into the Exchange without a HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing injection of Camel control headers - enabling control over internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Iggy component. The camel-iggy consumer mapped the user-headers of inbound Iggy messages into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (IggyFetchRecords copied the message user-headers straight into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, an actor able to publish to the consumed Iggy stream/topic could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as message user-headers. In a route where the Iggy consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.17.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix adds a dedicated IggyHeaderFilterStrategy (and a headerFilterStrategy endpoint option) that filters the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so externally-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from the inbound message before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), restrict who can publish to the consumed Iggy stream/topic, and avoid bridging an untrusted consumer directly into an HTTP producer whose target URI can be driven from message headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel Iggy
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-56140
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.43% / 34.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:16
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 13:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel AWS2 SNS: An inbound Camel-namespace filter was added to Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy to align it with sibling components

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel AWS SNS component. The camel-aws2-sns component filters Camel headers through a component-specific HeaderFilterStrategy, Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy. Like the sibling Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy, it originally configured only an outbound filter (setOutFilterPattern, which blocks Camel*, breadcrumbId and org.apache.camel.* headers from being written out) and did not configure an inbound filter rule. For the related camel-aws2-sqs component this inbound gap was exploitable, because the Sqs2Consumer maps inbound SQS message attributes into the Camel Exchange via HeaderFilterStrategy.applyFilterToExternalHeaders, allowing a message sender to inject Camel control headers (tracked as CVE-2026-46456). camel-aws2-sns, by contrast, is producer-only: Sns2Endpoint does not support consumers (createConsumer throws UnsupportedOperationException, 'You cannot receive messages from this endpoint'), so no externally-supplied message attributes are ever mapped inbound into a Camel Exchange through SNS, and the missing inbound filter rule on Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy was therefore not reachable by an attacker. As part of the same fix (CAMEL-23506), an inbound filter rule (setInFilterStartsWith for the Camel namespace) was added to Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy so that its configuration matches the corrected Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy and the other sibling strategies. This is a defense-in-depth alignment with no known exploit path in camel-aws2-sns. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. This is a defense-in-depth hardening change with no known exploit path in camel-aws2-sns, which is producer-only, so no urgent action or workaround is required. Users who want the aligned behaviour can upgrade to version 4.21.0, or to 4.14.8 on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, or to 4.18.3 on the 4.18.x releases stream, which contain the change. As a general best practice, operators should continue to apply least-privilege IAM permissions on their SNS topics.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel AWS2 SNS
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-50632
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.65% / 47.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2026 | 09:00
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CXF: JNDI Injection Vulnerability in JMSConfigFactory

A further incomplete fix for a previous advisory CVE-2026-44417 (Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE) for Apache CXF has been identified, which can allow code execution capabilities, if untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXFRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CVE-2020-9497
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.80% / 52.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jul, 2020 | 12:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older do not properly validate datareceived from RDP servers via static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, specially-craftedPDUs could result in disclosure of information within the memory ofthe guacd process handling the connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxguacamolefedoraApache Guacamole
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2007-1349
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5||MEDIUM
EPSS-10.11% / 95.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2007 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PerlRun.pm in Apache mod_perl before 1.30, and RegistryCooker.pm in mod_perl 2.x, does not properly escape PATH_INFO before use in a regular expression, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a crafted URI.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.The Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-ubuntu_linuxsatelliteenterprise_linux_workstationenterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_desktopmod_perlenterprise_linux_eusn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2014-2668
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5||MEDIUM
EPSS-22.29% / 97.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2014 | 16:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache CouchDB 1.5.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via the count parameter to /_uuids.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-couchdbn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-46588
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 32.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 09:36
Updated-06 Jul, 2026 | 22:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: CouchDB: Non-Camel-prefixed Exchange headers bypass HeaderFilterStrategy allowing operation override from untrusted input

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: through 4.14.7, from 4.15.0 through 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 through 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.14.8, 4.18.3, 4.21.0, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-50633
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.83% / 53.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2026 | 09:02
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CXF: JNDI Injection vulnerability in DispatchMDBMessageListenerImpl

A JNDI Injection vulnerability has been discovered in Apache CXF's JCA integration module, which can allow for code execution, if an attacker is able to manipulate the JCA deployment descriptor (ra.xml) or runtime activation parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXFRed Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CVE-2026-49434
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 47.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jun, 2026 | 09:55
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 18:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All: LdapNetworkConnector instantiates denied transports and a remote-properties broker

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All. An attacker that has access to publish or modify entries in LDAP that match the configured searchBase and searchFilter can instantiate denied transports inside the broker JVM. This can be used to fetch an attacker URL and spawn a second BrokerService inside the same JVM. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.7 or 5.19.8, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-activemq_brokeractivemqApache ActiveMQ AllApache ActiveMQApache ActiveMQ Broker
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-49432
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.84% / 54.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jun, 2026 | 09:54
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 18:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ Stomp: STOMP negative content-length enables denial of service

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ Stomp. A remote unauthenticated peer that can reach an exposed STOMP connector can trigger denial-of-service behavior by sending a negative content-length. For the NIO STOMP transport, an attacker can keep streaming body bytes and grow the per-connection command buffer beyond configured limits to cause OOM. For the blocking STOMP protocol, an error will instead force abnormal transport exception handling for the affected connection and closure. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ Stomp: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.7 or 5.19.8, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-activemqApache ActiveMQ StompApache ActiveMQ AllApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-50628
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.67% / 48.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2026 | 08:56
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CXF: OAuth2: Inverted IP Binding Check Defeats Security Control

A logic error in OAuthRequestFilter rejects legitimate requests originating from the bound IP address, while blindly allowing requests from any other IP address. Enabling this security feature inadvertently creates an inverse security check. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXFRed Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat JBoss Web Server 5Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2026-49086
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 34.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:10
Updated-06 Jul, 2026 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Dapr: Pub/Sub consumer copied the inbound CloudEvent's pub/sub-name and topic into producer-direction routing headers, allowing an actor who can publish to the subscribed topic to influence internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') vulnerability in Apache Camel DAPR component. The camel-dapr Dapr Pub/Sub consumer (DaprPubSubConsumer) copied two fields from each inbound CloudEvent - its Pub/Sub component name and its topic - into the CamelDaprPubSubName and CamelDaprTopic Exchange headers. These two headers are producer-direction routing headers: when the route republishes through a Dapr producer, DaprConfigurationOptionsProxy reads them back and prefers them over the destination configured on the endpoint. As a result, in a route that consumes from one Dapr Pub/Sub topic and republishes to another (for example from('dapr-pubsub:p:t').to('dapr-pubsub:p:other')), an actor able to publish a message to the subscribed topic could set the CloudEvent's pub/sub-name and topic to values of their choosing and cause the re-published message to be delivered to an arbitrary Dapr Pub/Sub component and topic instead of the configured destination - redirecting or exfiltrating the message and bypassing the route's intended routing and any topic-level access controls in the underlying broker. Exploitation requires the ability to publish to the topic the route subscribes to; no other authentication or user interaction is needed. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.12.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, remove the CamelDaprPubSubName and CamelDaprTopic headers from the Exchange between the Dapr consumer and any Dapr producer in the route (for example removeHeaders('CamelDaprPubSubName', 'CamelDaprTopic')), and restrict who can publish to the subscribed Dapr Pub/Sub topic so that only trusted producers can send to it.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache Camel Dapr
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-441
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')
CVE-2026-48204
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.45% / 36.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:06
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-MongoDB-GridFS: The gridfs.* control headers used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to switch the GridFS operation - including destructive file deletion - in the default configuration

Improper Input Validation, Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache Camel in Camel Mongodb Gridfs component. The camel-mongodb-gridfs producer selects the GridFS operation to perform from the gridfs.operation Exchange header when the endpoint's operation parameter is not set - which is the default. The control-header constants (GridFsConstants.GRIDFS_OPERATION, GRIDFS_OBJECT_ID, GRIDFS_METADATA, GRIDFS_CHUNKSIZE, GRIDFS_FILE_ID_PRODUCED) were the plain strings gridfs.operation, gridfs.objectid, gridfs.metadata, gridfs.chunksize and gridfs.fileid. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a mongodb-gridfs: producer with no explicit operation, any HTTP client could therefore set the gridfs.operation header to override the route's intended operation - switching, for example, a file upload to remove (deleting a file identified by the attacker-supplied gridfs.objectid), listAll (enumerating every file in the bucket) or findOne (reading a file) - and supply a gridfs.metadata value that is parsed as a MongoDB document, enabling NoSQL operator injection. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that drive GridFS operations or metadata via the raw header names must use CamelGridFsOperation / CamelGridFsObjectId / CamelGridFsMetadata / CamelGridFsChunkSize / CamelGridFsFileId instead of the gridfs.* names. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, set an explicit operation on the mongodb-gridfs: endpoint so the operation is not taken from a header, and strip the gridfs.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the producer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control
CVE-2026-48203
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 29.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:06
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-Solr: The SolrParam. and SolrField. Exchange header prefixes used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to inject Solr query parameters (server-side request forgery) and document fields

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Improper Input Validation, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel Solr component. The camel-solr producer copies Exchange message headers whose names begin with the SolrParam. prefix into the parameters of the Solr request, and headers whose names begin with the SolrField. prefix into the fields of the indexed Solr document. The prefix constants (SolrConstants.HEADER_PARAM_PREFIX / HEADER_FIELD_PREFIX) were the plain strings SolrParam. / SolrField.. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a solr: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set SolrParam.* headers to inject arbitrary Solr request parameters - including shards or stream.url, which cause the Solr server to issue server-side requests to an attacker-chosen URL (server-side request forgery, for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint), or qt to reach administrative request handlers - and set SolrField.* headers to inject arbitrary fields into indexed documents. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Solr parameters or fields via the raw header prefixes must use CamelSolrParam. / CamelSolrField. instead of SolrParam. / SolrField.. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the SolrParam.* and SolrField.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the solr: producer, and set the required Solr parameters and fields from a trusted source in the route.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-48205
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 29.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:08
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel DNS: The dns.* and term Exchange header constants used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to influence internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel DNS component. The camel-dns producers read DNS operation parameters - the resolver to query, the name or domain to look up, the record type and class, and the search term - from Exchange message headers whose constant values (DnsConstants.DNS_SERVER, DNS_NAME, DNS_DOMAIN, DNS_TYPE, DNS_CLASS, TERM) were the plain strings dns.server, dns.name, dns.domain, dns.type, dns.class and term. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a dns: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set the dns.server header to make the dig producer build a SimpleResolver pointing at an attacker-controlled DNS server - a server-side request forgery via DNS, through which the attacker observes the queried name and can return poisoned responses - and set the dns.name / dns.domain headers to resolve arbitrary internal hostnames, disclosing whether they exist (internal network reconnaissance). No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that drive DNS operations via the raw header names must use CamelDnsServer / CamelDnsName / CamelDnsDomain / CamelDnsType / CamelDnsClass / CamelDnsTerm instead of the dns.* / term names. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the dns.* and term headers from any untrusted ingress before the dns: producer, and set the DNS server and lookup parameters from a trusted source in the route.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel DNS
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-49098
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.39% / 31.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:10
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-Kafka: The kafka.OVERRIDE_TOPIC (and other kafka.*) Exchange header constants used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the upstream HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to redirect Kafka messages to an arbitrary topic

Improper Input Validation, Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel Kafka Component. The camel-kafka producer can override its configured target topic at runtime from the kafka.OVERRIDE_TOPIC Exchange header: KafkaProducer.evaluateTopic() returns the header value in preference to the topic configured on the endpoint. The control-header constants in KafkaConstants (for example OVERRIDE_TOPIC = kafka.OVERRIDE_TOPIC, OVERRIDE_TIMESTAMP = kafka.OVERRIDE_TIMESTAMP, PARTITION_KEY = kafka.PARTITION_KEY) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. camel-kafka's own KafkaHeaderFilterStrategy does filter the kafka.* namespace, but only on the Kafka-to-Exchange serialization boundary (reading Kafka record headers into the Exchange, and writing Exchange headers into a Kafka record); it does not apply to headers that arrive from an upstream consumer in a multi-component route. The upstream HTTP consumer uses HttpHeaderFilterStrategy, which blocks only the Camel / camel namespace, so a kafka.* header passes through unfiltered. As a result, in a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a kafka: producer, any HTTP client could set the kafka.OVERRIDE_TOPIC header and cause the message to be published to an arbitrary Kafka topic instead of the configured one - redirecting it to a sensitive internal topic, or injecting attacker-crafted messages into a topic consumed by a critical downstream service. The related kafka.OVERRIDE_TIMESTAMP and kafka.PARTITION_KEY headers could likewise be injected to backdate messages or target specific partitions. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set or read Kafka headers via the raw header names must use the CamelKafka* names (for example CamelKafkaOverrideTopic and CamelKafkaTopic) instead of the old kafka.* values. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the kafka.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the kafka: producer (for example removeHeaders('kafka.*') at the start of the route), and set the target topic from a trusted source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CVE-2026-48206
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 27.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:09
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel JIRA: A set of non-Camel-prefixed Exchange header constants bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to drive arbitrary JIRA issue operations using the endpoint's configured credentials

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel JIRA component. The camel-jira producers read their operation parameters - the issue key, project key, transition id, summary, type, assignee, components, watchers, link type, work-log minutes and others - from Exchange message headers. The header constants defined in JiraConstants (for example ISSUE_KEY = IssueKey, ISSUE_PROJECT_KEY = ProjectKey, ISSUE_TRANSITION_ID = IssueTransitionId, LINK_TYPE = linkType) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a jira: producer, any HTTP client could therefore supply these headers and override the values the route intended, driving JIRA operations against the configured JIRA instance with the endpoint's configured service-account credentials - for example deleting or transitioning an arbitrary issue (via IssueKey / IssueTransitionId), creating an issue in a different project (via ProjectKey), modifying issue fields, adding or removing watchers, or logging work. The operations are bounded by what the configured service account is permitted to do. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that drive JIRA operations via the raw header names must use the CamelJira* names (for example CamelJiraIssueKey) instead of the old values. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the camel-jira control headers from any untrusted ingress before the jira: producer (for example removing the IssueKey, ProjectKey, IssueTransitionId and related headers at the start of the route), and set the required JIRA operation parameters from a trusted source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel JIRA
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-639
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CVE-2026-49097
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 34.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:10
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-IRC: The irc.sendTo (and other irc.*) Exchange header constants used non-Camel-prefixed names that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to redirect outgoing IRC messages to arbitrary channels or users

Improper Input Validation, Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel IRC component. The camel-irc producer chooses the destination of an outgoing IRC message from the irc.sendTo Exchange header (the constant IrcConstants.IRC_SEND_TO, value irc.sendTo); when that header is present it overrides the channel list configured on the endpoint, and the message is sent only to the specified destination. This and the component's other control headers (irc.target, irc.messageType, irc.user.*, irc.num, irc.value) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into an irc: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set the irc.sendTo header and redirect a message that the route intended for a configured channel to an arbitrary IRC channel or user - exfiltrating the message content to an attacker-chosen nickname, leaking it into a public channel, or delivering messages that appear to come from the bot. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set IRC headers via the raw header names must use the CamelIrc* names (for example CamelIrcSendTo) instead of the old irc.* values. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the irc.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the irc: producer (for example removeHeaders('irc.*') at the start of the route), and set the IRC destination from a trusted source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CVE-2026-49042
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 32.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 09:34
Updated-06 Jul, 2026 | 22:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: langchain4j-tools: filter tool argument headers against declared parameters

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 through 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 through 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.3, 4.21.0, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-46453
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.45% / 36.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 07:55
Updated-07 Jul, 2026 | 23:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-Elasticsearch-Rest-Client: Exchange header constants without the Camel prefix bypass inbound HTTP header filtering, allowing untrusted clients to override the Elasticsearch query and operation

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel ElasticSearch Rest Client. The camel-elasticsearch-rest-client component reads several Exchange headers to control its behaviour - SEARCH_QUERY (an advanced query body), OPERATION (which Elasticsearch operation to run), INDEX_NAME, INDEX_SETTINGS and ID. The string values of these header constants, defined in ElasticSearchRestClientConstant, are plain unprefixed names ('SEARCH_QUERY', 'OPERATION', 'INDEX_NAME', 'INDEX_SETTINGS', 'ID') rather than the 'Camel'-prefixed names used by every other Camel component (for example CamelSqlQuery, CamelMongoDbCriteria, CamelCqlQuery). Camel's inbound HTTP header filter, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy, blocks only header names that begin with 'Camel' or 'camel'. Because the Elasticsearch header names do not carry that prefix, they pass through the inbound filter unchanged. When a Camel route exposes an HTTP entry point (for example platform-http) in front of an elasticsearch-rest-client producer, an untrusted HTTP client can set these headers directly on its request and override the query and operation that the route author configured: reading every document in the index (SEARCH_QUERY with a match_all query), deleting documents (OPERATION set to Delete together with ID), or exfiltrating selected fields. No credentials are required and the producer reads the headers unconditionally. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.3.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix renames the camel-elasticsearch-rest-client Exchange header constant string values (ID, SEARCH_QUERY, INDEX_SETTINGS, INDEX_NAME, OPERATION) to carry the Camel prefix (CamelElasticsearchId, CamelElasticsearchSearchQuery, CamelElasticsearchIndexSettings, CamelElasticsearchIndexName, CamelElasticsearchOperation) so that they are blocked by the inbound HttpHeaderFilterStrategy; the Java field names are unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the affected headers from untrusted inbound messages before they reach the producer (for example removeHeader('SEARCH_QUERY'), removeHeader('OPERATION'), removeHeader('INDEX_NAME'), removeHeader('INDEX_SETTINGS') and removeHeader('ID') in front of the elasticsearch-rest-client endpoint), or apply a custom HeaderFilterStrategy that blocks these names.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-639
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CVE-2026-46454
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.49% / 39.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 07:56
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-Cometd: Inbound Bayeux message headers are mapped into the Exchange without a HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing unauthenticated clients to inject Camel control headers

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Cometd Component. The camel-cometd component maps inbound Bayeux (CometD) message headers into the Camel Exchange without applying a HeaderFilterStrategy. CometdBinding.populateExchangeFromMessage copies the entire ext.CamelHeaders map supplied by the CometD client directly onto the Camel message (message.setHeaders), so any header name - including Camel-internal control headers such as CamelHttpUri, CamelFileName or CamelJmsDestinationName - is accepted unmodified. Because a CometdComponent installs no Bayeux SecurityPolicy by default, any client that can complete the Bayeux handshake against the CometD endpoint can publish such a message without authentication. An attacker can therefore inject arbitrary Camel control headers that influence the behaviour of downstream producers in the route (for example redirecting an HTTP producer, changing a file name, or overriding a JMS destination); the injected headers also persist across internal direct, seda and vm hops. The concrete downstream impact depends on which producers the route uses. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix implements a HeaderFilterStrategy in the camel-cometd binding (a long-standing TODO in the code) that filters the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so client-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from inbound CometD messages before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), and install an explicit Bayeux SecurityPolicy on the CometdComponent so that only authenticated clients can publish.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-46457
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.42% / 34.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 07:57
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 03:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel: Camel-NATS: Inbound NATS message headers are mapped into the Exchange without a configured HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a client that can publish to the subject to inject Camel control headers

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel NATS component. The camel-nats component maps inbound NATS message headers into the Camel Exchange but defaulted its headerFilterStrategy to a bare new DefaultHeaderFilterStrategy() with no inbound rules configured (NatsConfiguration). With no inFilter, inFilterPattern or inFilterStartsWith set, DefaultHeaderFilterStrategy.applyFilterToExternalHeaders returns not filtered for every header name, so NatsConsumer copies every NATS message header - including Camel-internal control headers such as CamelHttpUri, CamelFileName or CamelSqlQuery - unmodified onto the Camel message. A client able to publish to the consumed NATS subject can therefore inject arbitrary Camel control headers that influence the behaviour of downstream producers in the route (for example redirecting an HTTP producer, changing a file name, or overriding a query); the injected headers also persist across internal direct, seda and vm hops. The concrete downstream impact depends on which producers the route uses. NATS message headers require NATS 2.2 or later, and the issue is reachable without credentials when the NATS server is configured without authentication (the NATS server default). This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix makes camel-nats default to a dedicated NatsHeaderFilterStrategy that filters the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so client-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from inbound NATS messages before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), and enable authentication on the NATS server so that only trusted clients can publish to the consumed subject.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2026-46584
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.38% / 30.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:02
Updated-08 Jul, 2026 | 15:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Mail: The mail producer applied attacker-supplied message headers as JavaMail session properties, allowing an attacker to influence SMTP parameters

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Mail Component. The camel-mail producer (MailProducer.getSender) scanned the outgoing Exchange for message headers in the mail.smtp. / mail.smtps. namespace and, when any were present, built a per-message JavaMail sender with those values applied as JavaMail session properties, overriding the endpoint configuration. This namespace is Camel-internal - only MailProducer interprets it - and was not blocked by any HeaderFilterStrategy, so the values could originate from any inbound protocol (for example platform-http query parameters or request headers, or JMS / Kafka messages from untrusted producers) that feeds a route ending in an smtp / smtps producer without an intervening removeHeaders. The maximal impact is version-dependent: on releases before 4.19.0, setting mail.smtp.host redirects the SMTP connection to a server under the attacker's control, and because the producer then authenticates with the endpoint's configured username and password those credentials are transmitted to the attacker; on 4.19.0 and later the producer connects to the endpoint's configured host explicitly, so the reachable impact is limited to weakening transport security (for example mail.smtp.ssl.trust, mail.smtp.starttls.enable or mail.smtp.socks.host) and interception of the outgoing message rather than host redirect. Exploitation requires a route that channels untrusted input into the mail producer without stripping the namespace. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, the per-message override is disabled by default; enable it only on trusted endpoints with useJavaMailSessionPropertiesFromHeaders=true. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the namespace before the mail producer with removeHeaders('mail.smtp.*') and removeHeaders('mail.smtps.*') between any untrusted ingress and the smtp / smtps producer. Even with the opt-in enabled, route authors should still strip the namespace on any path that carries untrusted input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel Mail
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next
Details not found