Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2025-69420

Summary
Assigner-openssl
Assigner Org ID-3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5
Published At-27 Jan, 2026 | 16:01
Updated At-28 Jan, 2026 | 19:33
Rejected At-
Credits

Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function

Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:openssl
Assigner Org ID:3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5
Published At:27 Jan, 2026 | 16:01
Updated At:28 Jan, 2026 | 19:33
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function

Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.

Affected Products
Vendor
OpenSSLOpenSSL
Product
OpenSSL
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 3.6.0 before 3.6.1 (semver)
  • From 3.5.0 before 3.5.5 (semver)
  • From 3.4.0 before 3.4.4 (semver)
  • From 3.3.0 before 3.3.6 (semver)
  • From 3.0.0 before 3.0.19 (semver)
  • From 1.1.1 before 1.1.1ze (custom)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-754CWE-754 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-754
Description: CWE-754 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/
text:
Low
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

reporter
Luigino Camastra (Aisle Research)
remediation developer
Bob Beck
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt
vendor-advisory
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085
patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e
patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9
patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b
patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a
patch
Hyperlink: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt
Resource:
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a
Resource:
patch
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:openssl-security@openssl.org
Published At:27 Jan, 2026 | 16:16
Updated At:02 Feb, 2026 | 18:33

Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CPE Matches

OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 1.1.1(inclusive) to 1.1.1ze(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 3.0.0(inclusive) to 3.0.19(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 3.3.0(inclusive) to 3.3.6(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 3.4.0(inclusive) to 3.4.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 3.5.0(inclusive) to 3.5.5(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
OpenSSL
openssl
>>openssl>>Versions from 3.6.0(inclusive) to 3.6.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-754Secondaryopenssl-security@openssl.org
CWE ID: CWE-754
Type: Secondary
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9openssl-security@openssl.org
Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133aopenssl-security@openssl.org
Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4eopenssl-security@openssl.org
Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1bopenssl-security@openssl.org
Patch
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085openssl-security@openssl.org
Patch
https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txtopenssl-security@openssl.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt
Source: openssl-security@openssl.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

161Records found

CVE-2004-0079
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.17% / 83.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2004 | 05:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 01:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-scolitebluecoattarantellasecurecomputingneoteris4dstonesoftn/aAvaya LLCNovellSun Microsystems (Oracle Corporation)Symantec CorporationCisco Systems, Inc.Apple Inc.HP Inc.Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.Silicon Graphics, Inc.OpenBSDRed Hat, Inc.Dell Inc.FreeBSD FoundationOpenSSLVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-wbemfirewall_services_moduleapplication_and_content_networking_softwareaaa_servers8700okena_stormwatchmac_os_xthreat_responseapache-based_web_serverpix_firewallpropacks8500provider-1call_managerciscoworks_common_management_foundationclientless_vpn_gateway_4400secure_content_acceleratorvsus8300stonebeat_fullclustergsx_serverfirewall-1access_registrarstonebeat_securityclustergss_4480_global_site_selectortarantella_enterprisestonegate_vpn_clientproxysgvpn-1mac_os_x_serverenterprise_linux_desktopmds_9000enterprise_linuxwebstaropenserverbsafe_ssl-jioswebnssg203css11000_content_services_switchopenssllinuxintuity_audixserverclustersg5openbsdsg208sg200cacheos_ca_sastonegateciscoworks_common_servicesgss_4490_global_site_selectorimanagerinstant_virtual_extranetedirectorysidewinderhp-uxconverged_communications_serverstonebeat_webclustercrypto_accelerator_4000speed_technologies_litespeed_web_serverfreebsdpix_firewall_softwarecontent_services_switch_11500css_secure_content_acceleratorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2021-4044
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-17.58% / 94.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 18:40
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl

Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-h300e500f_firmwareopenssla250_firmwarecloud_backuph500se-series_performance_analyzerh410c_firmwareh300s_firmwareh410sh300snode.jssnapcenterh300e_firmware500fh500eontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwareh500s_firmwareh500e_firmwarea250h700eh410ch700e_firmwareh700sOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-835
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
CVE-2018-0732
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-81.09% / 99.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Client DoS due to large DH parameter

During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.Debian GNU/LinuxNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSL
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxnode.jsopensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-320
Not Available
CVE-2023-0215
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 65.55%
||
7 Day CHG-0.04%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:03
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Use-after-free following BIO_new_NDEF

The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-416
Use After Free
CVE-2019-0190
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-18.92% / 95.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2019 | 22:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A bug exists in the way mod_ssl handled client renegotiations. A remote attacker could send a carefully crafted request that would cause mod_ssl to enter a loop leading to a denial of service. This bug can be only triggered with Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.37 when using OpenSSL version 1.1.1 or later, due to an interaction in changes to handling of renegotiation attempts.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-http_serveropensslinstantis_enterprisetrackretail_xstore_point_of_servicehospitality_guest_accessenterprise_manager_ops_centerApache HTTP Server
CVE-2017-3731
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-10.40% / 93.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 May, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Truncated packet could crash via OOB read

If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-opensslnode.jsOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2022-3602
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-83.22% / 99.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectOpenSSLNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)NetApp, Inc.
Product-fedoraclustered_data_ontapopensslnode.jsOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2016-6304
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-23.43% / 95.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Sep, 2016 | 00:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNovell
Product-opensslsuse_linux_enterprise_module_for_web_scriptingnode.jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-401
Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
CVE-2016-7052
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-13.86% / 94.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Sep, 2016 | 19:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by triggering a CRL operation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNovell
Product-opensslsuse_linux_enterprise_module_for_web_scriptingnode.jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2023-0217
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 64.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:02
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL dereference validating DSA public key

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2023-0401
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:00
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification

A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2022-0778
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-8.12% / 91.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Mar, 2022 | 17:05
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt() reachable when parsing certificates

The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLTenable, Inc.NetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectMariaDB Foundation
Product-500fclustered_data_ontapdebian_linuxcloud_volumes_ontap_mediator500f_firmwareopenssla250_firmwaremariadbfedoraclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectora250node.jsstoragegridsantricity_smi-s_providernessusOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-835
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
CVE-2022-3996
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2022 | 15:43
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 01:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Policy Constraints Double Locking

If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this results in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy processing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered to be a common setup. Policy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. Update (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement was corrected based on CVE-2023-0466.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-opensslOpenSSLsmi-s_provideraltavault_ost_plug-inopensslfas\/aff_baseboard_management_controllerontap_9hci_baseboard_management_controllermanagement_services_for_element_software
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2022-3786
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-20.63% / 95.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectOpenSSLNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-fedoraopensslnode.jsOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-120
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
CVE-2025-9230
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 8.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Sep, 2025 | 13:17
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 22:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap

Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code. Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as Moderate severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2016-2105
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-48.15% / 97.64%
||
7 Day CHG-0.59%
Published-05 May, 2016 | 00:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)openSUSERed Hat, Inc.Apple Inc.OpenSSLDebian GNU/LinuxOracle CorporationCanonical Ltd.
Product-enterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_server_ausdebian_linuxenterprise_linux_hpc_nodeleapopensusemysqlenterprise_linux_desktopubuntu_linuxenterprise_linux_server_eusenterprise_linux_workstationopensslenterprise_linux_hpc_node_eusmac_os_xnode.jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2016-0797
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-35.73% / 96.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Mar, 2016 | 00:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple integer overflows in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption or NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long digit string that is mishandled by the (1) BN_dec2bn or (2) BN_hex2bn function, related to crypto/bn/bn.h and crypto/bn/bn_print.c.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.
Product-openssldebian_linuxnode.jsubuntu_linuxn/a
CVE-2025-69421
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 18.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2026 | 16:01
Updated-02 Feb, 2026 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL Pointer Dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex function

Issue summary: Processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application processing PKCS#12 files. The PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function does not check whether the oct parameter is NULL before dereferencing it. When called from PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() with a malformed PKCS#12 file, this parameter can be NULL, causing a crash. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. Exploiting this issue requires an attacker to provide a malformed PKCS#12 file to an application that processes it. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2015-3194
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-60.56% / 98.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Dec, 2015 | 00:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

crypto/rsa/rsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an RSA PSS ASN.1 signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.
Product-openssldebian_linuxubuntu_linuxnode.jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2016-8610
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-71.13% / 98.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2017 | 22:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Oracle CorporationPalo Alto Networks, Inc.OpenSSLFujitsu LimitedNetApp, Inc.
Product-enterprise_linux_desktoponcommand_unified_manageroncommand_balancecore_rdbmsretail_predictive_application_serverclustered_data_ontapenterprise_linux_server_eusenterprise_linuxcommunications_ip_service_activatoradaptive_access_managerm12-2_firmwarehost_agentsnapdrivejboss_enterprise_application_platformclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorm10-1storagegridpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsontap_select_deployservice_processorm12-2sapplication_testing_suitem12-1_firmwarem12-2weblogic_serverenterprise_linux_server_tussnapcenter_serverenterprise_linux_workstationm12-2s_firmwaresmi-s_providerdebian_linuxenterprise_linux_servertimesten_in-memory_databasem10-4_firmwarestoragegrid_webscaleenterprise_linux_server_ausdata_ontapcn1610_firmwarecommunications_analyticsopensslm10-4sm10-4s_firmwaredata_ontap_edgem10-1_firmwarecn1610enterprise_manager_ops_centerjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolspan-osm12-1oncommand_workflow_automationgoldengate_application_adaptersm10-4e-series_santricity_os_controllerOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-1473
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys

The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h410saff_8700_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8300_firmwareh500s_firmwarefas_500f_firmwareaff_a400aff_500fsantricity_smi-s_provideropensslh700sh500sfas_8700_firmwareh700e_firmwarea250_firmwareaff_8700aff_a400_firmwareh500e_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorclustered_data_ontaph300eh300e_firmwareaff_8300solidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeaff_500f_firmwareh700eh500eh700s_firmwarea700ssmi-s_providera250fas_8700h410s_firmwaresnapmanagerfabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwareh300s_firmwarefas_8300fas_500faff_8300_firmwareh300sa700s_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-459
Incomplete Cleanup
CVE-2021-23840
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.57% / 68.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2021 | 16:55
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Integer overflow in CipherUpdate

Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLMcAfee, LLCFujitsu Limited
Product-jd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementm12-1epolicy_orchestratoropensslm10-4s_firmwarebusiness_intelligencelog_correlation_enginem10-4_firmwarem10-4communications_cloud_native_core_policym10-4sm12-1_firmwarenode.jsm12-2sdebian_linuxgraalvmnosql_databasenessus_network_monitorm10-1_firmwarem10-1m12-2s_firmwareenterprise_manager_ops_centerm12-2_firmwarejd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsm12-2mysql_serverOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2024-6119
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-5.69% / 90.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2024 | 15:58
Updated-03 Jun, 2025 | 10:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks

Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process. Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of service. Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the application program. Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address. TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity of the issue is Moderate. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h610c_firmwareontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityh700sh610sh500sh300s500f_firmware500fh410c_firmwareh615cc250_firmwareh610cbootstrap_osh410ch610s_firmwarebrocade_fabric_operating_systemopensslh500s_firmwareh410s_firmwarea250h410sa250_firmwarec250hci_compute_nodeactive_iq_unified_managerh700s_firmwareontap_9h615c_firmwareh300s_firmwaremanagement_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hciontap_toolsOpenSSLopenssl
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2020-1967
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-67.31% / 98.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Segmentation fault in SSL_check_chain

Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jdedwardsFreeBSD FoundationFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.Broadcom Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEOpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-freebsdjd_edwards_world_securitypeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementopenssle-series_performance_analyzeractive_iq_unified_managerlog_correlation_enginemysql_connectorsleaponcommand_workflow_automationmysql_workbenchsnapcentersteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagehttp_servermysqldebian_linuxsmi-s_providermysql_enterprise_monitorfedoraenterpriseoneapplication_serverfabric_operating_systementerprise_manager_ops_centerenterprise_manager_base_platformoncommand_insightOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2024-4741
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 46.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2024 | 10:20
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 18:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications. The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use. The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use. The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use. While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-OpenSSLopenssl
CWE ID-CWE-416
Use After Free
CVE-2022-4450
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.28%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:04
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double free after calling PEM_read_bio_ex

The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-opensslstormshield_network_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-415
Double Free
CVE-2023-0216
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.83% / 74.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:03
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid pointer dereference in d2i_PKCS7 functions

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2023-0464
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.83% / 74.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2023 | 16:36
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive Resource Usage Verifying X.509 Policy Constraints

A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-22795
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 2.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2026 | 16:01
Updated-02 Feb, 2026 | 18:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in PKCS#12 parsing

Issue summary: An invalid or NULL pointer dereference can happen in an application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file. Impact summary: An application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer on memory read, resulting in a Denial of Service. A type confusion vulnerability exists in PKCS#12 parsing code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid pointer read. The location is constrained to a 1-byte address space, meaning any attempted pointer manipulation can only target addresses between 0x00 and 0xFF. This range corresponds to the zero page, which is unmapped on most modern operating systems and will reliably result in a crash, leading only to a Denial of Service. Exploiting this issue also requires a user or application to process a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file. It is uncommon to accept untrusted PKCS#12 files in applications as they are usually used to store private keys which are trusted by definition. For these reasons, the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2026-22796
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2026 | 16:01
Updated-02 Feb, 2026 | 18:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ASN1_TYPE Type Confusion in the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function

Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the signature verification of signed PKCS#7 data where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing malformed PKCS#7 data. Impact summary: An application performing signature verification of PKCS#7 data or calling directly the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The function PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() accesses the message digest attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_OCTET_STRING, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed signed PKCS#7 to an application that verifies it. The impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service, the PKCS7 API is legacy and applications should be using the CMS API instead. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS#7 parsing implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2023-5678
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.64% / 69.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Nov, 2023 | 15:47
Updated-02 Dec, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-606
Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2026-25639
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2026 | 20:11
Updated-10 Feb, 2026 | 15:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Axios affected by Denial of Service via __proto__ Key in mergeConfig

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.13.5, the mergeConfig function in axios crashes with a TypeError when processing configuration objects containing __proto__ as an own property. An attacker can trigger this by providing a malicious configuration object created via JSON.parse(), causing complete denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axios
Product-axios
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2021-43801
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.37% / 58.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2021 | 19:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Uncaught Exception in mercurius

Mercurius is a GraphQL adapter for Fastify. Any users from Mercurius@8.10.0 to 8.11.1 are subjected to a denial of service attack by sending a malformed JSON to `/graphql` unless they are using a custom error handler. The vulnerability has been fixed in https://github.com/mercurius-js/mercurius/pull/678 and shipped as v8.11.2. As a workaround users may use a custom error handler.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mercurius_projectmercurius-js
Product-mercuriusmercurius
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2021-42020
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 63.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 11:31
Updated-12 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The third-party component, in its TFTP functionality fails to check for null terminations in file names. If an attacker were to exploit this, it could result in data corruption, and possibly a hard-fault of the application.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-ruggedcom_rs969ruggedcom_rs910ruggedcom_rsg2100ruggedcom_rsg2300pruggedcom_rs930lruggedcom_rsg907rruggedcom_rsg910cruggedcom_rs416ruggedcom_rs900wruggedcom_i801ruggedcom_rosruggedcom_m2100ruggedcom_rmcruggedcom_i800ruggedcom_rst2228ruggedcom_rs930wruggedcom_rmc8388ruggedcom_rsg2200ruggedcom_rs900ruggedcom_rs401ruggedcom_rs8000truggedcom_rsg909rruggedcom_rp110ruggedcom_rs910lruggedcom_i802ruggedcom_m969ruggedcom_rs910wruggedcom_rsg2100pruggedcom_rs8000ruggedcom_rst916pruggedcom_rs900gpruggedcom_rs900lruggedcom_rmc40ruggedcom_rsl910ruggedcom_rmc41ruggedcom_rsg920pruggedcom_rs920wruggedcom_rs416v2ruggedcom_rs8000aruggedcom_rsg2300ruggedcom_rst916cruggedcom_m2200ruggedcom_rs400ruggedcom_rst2228pruggedcom_rmc20ruggedcom_rs8000hruggedcom_rsg908cruggedcom_i803ruggedcom_rsg2488ruggedcom_rs900gruggedcom_rsg2288ruggedcom_rs920lruggedcom_rs940gruggedcom_rmc30RUGGEDCOM RS8000RUGGEDCOM RS900LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS401NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS920LNCRUGGEDCOM RS910LRUGGEDCOM RS930WRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600RUGGEDCOM i801NCRUGGEDCOM RS940GRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM i800NCRUGGEDCOM RS910RUGGEDCOM RSG908CRUGGEDCOM RS8000NCRUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS920LRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS8000HRUGGEDCOM RS900LNCRUGGEDCOM RS8000TRUGGEDCOM RS910NCRUGGEDCOM RS900GRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RS900WRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG910CRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600NCRUGGEDCOM RS969RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG909RRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PRUGGEDCOM RS930LNCRUGGEDCOM RS416PRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2200NCRUGGEDCOM RS8000HNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600FRUGGEDCOM RS416NCRUGGEDCOM RS930LRUGGEDCOM RSG907RRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910WRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GNCRUGGEDCOM RS900GNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910LNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RMC30RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANCRUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600TRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS400NCRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RP110RUGGEDCOM i801RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS8000TNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS920WRUGGEDCOM M2200RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900RUGGEDCOM RSG2100RUGGEDCOM M969NCRUGGEDCOM RS416PNCRUGGEDCOM RS1600FNCRUGGEDCOM RS400RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600TNCRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM M969RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM M2200NCRUGGEDCOM RS8000ARUGGEDCOM i803RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNCRUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NCRUGGEDCOM RP110NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2200RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSL910NCRUGGEDCOM RS969NCRUGGEDCOM RS416RUGGEDCOM RST2228PRUGGEDCOM i800RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RST916PRUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSL910RUGGEDCOM RST916CRUGGEDCOM RS900GPRUGGEDCOM RS900GPNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RST2228RUGGEDCOM RS401RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802NCRUGGEDCOM i803NCRUGGEDCOM M2100RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900NCRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RMC30NCRUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM M2100NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2024-40619
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Rockwell Automation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Rockwell Automation
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Aug, 2024 | 19:52
Updated-31 Jan, 2025 | 15:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rockwell Automation GuardLogix/ControlLogix 5580 Controller denial-of-service Vulnerability via Malformed Packet Handling

CVE-2024-40619 IMPACT A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the affected products. The vulnerability occurs when a malformed CIP packet is sent over the network to the device and results in a major nonrecoverable fault causing a denial-of-service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Product-guardlogix_5580_firmwarecontrollogix_5580controllogix_5580_firmwareguardlogix_5580GuardLogix 5580ControlLogix® 5580controllogix_5580_firmwareguardlogix_5580_firmware
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2024-39540
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2024 | 16:16
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 14:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series, and MX Series with SPC3: Specific valid TCP traffic can cause a pfe crash

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, and MX Series with SPC3 allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). When an affected device receives specific valid TCP traffic, the pfe crashes and restarts leading to a momentary but complete service outage. This issue affects Junos OS: 21.2 releases from 21.2R3-S5 before 21.2R3-S6. This issue does not affect earlier or later releases.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-mx480srx4600vsrxsrx2300srx3400srx340srx380mx240srx240srx5400srx3600srx345srx1400srx650srx550_hmsrx100srx5000srx4100srx550mx960csrxjunossrx110srx1500srx4000srx5600srx300srx4300srx550msrx5800srx220srx4200srx240h2srx4700srx1600srx320srx240msrx210Junos OSjunos
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2024-39545
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2024 | 16:22
Updated-23 Jan, 2026 | 19:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3 and NFX350: When VPN tunnels parameters are not configured in specific way the iked process will crash

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the the IKE daemon (iked) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3 and NFX350 allows allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker sending specific mismatching parameters as part of the IPsec negotiation to trigger an iked crash leading to Denial of Service (DoS). This issue is applicable to all platforms that run iked. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series, MX Series with SPC3 and NFX350:  * All versions before 21.2R3-S8,  * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S7,  * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S2,  * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S1,  * from 22.3 before 22.3R2-S1, 22.3R3,  * from 22.4 before 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2, 22.4R3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx4200mx2008srx5600mx2010srx4700srx4100srx1500srx5400srx300srx340mx10008nfx350mx960junosmx480srx320srx4600srx5800mx2020mx-spc3srx4120mx304mx204mx10004srx4300mx240srx2300srx380srx1600Junos OSjunos_os
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2019-8960
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Flexera Software LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Flexera Software LLC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 59.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2020 | 14:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A Denial of Service vulnerability related to command handling has been identified in FlexNet Publisher lmadmin.exe version 11.16.2. The message reading function used in lmadmin.exe can, given a certain message, call itself again and then wait for a further message. With a particular flag set in the original message, but no second message received, the function eventually return an unexpected value which leads to an exception being thrown. The end result can be process termination.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-flexeran/a
Product-flexnet_publishern/a
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2019-6857
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 65.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2020 | 22:57
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists in Modicon M580, Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum, Modicon Premium (see security notification for specific versions) which could cause a Denial of Service of the controller when reading specific memory blocks using Modbus TCP.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-
Product-140cpu67260_firmware140cpu67261_firmwaretsxp573634m140cpu65150tsxp571634m140cpu67861modicon_m580_firmwaretsxh5744m_firmwaretsxh5744m140cpu65160_firmware140cpu67160s_firmware140cpu65160s_firmware140cpu67160_firmware140cpu65860_firmwaretsxp574634m_firmwaretsxp575634mmodicon_m580140cpu65860tsxp575634m_firmwaretsxh5724m_firmware140cpu65160tsxp573634m_firmwaretsxp57454m_firmware140cpu67160140cpu67861_firmwaretsxp57254m_firmwaretsxp57304mtsxp572634mtsxp574634mtsxh5724mtsxp57304m_firmwaretsxp57204m_140cpu67261140cpu67060_firmwaretsxp576634m_firmware140cpu65160s140cpu65260_firmware140cpu67160stsxp576634m_tsxp57154m_firmwaretsxp57154mtsxp57454mmodicon_m340tsxp57254mtsxp57554mtsxp572634m_firmwaretsxp57104m_firmware140cpu67260tsxp57104mtsxp57354mtsxp57354m_firmware140cpu65150_firmwaretsxp57204m_firmwaretsxp57554m_firmware140cpu65260140cpu67060tsxp571634m_firmwaremodicon_m340_firmwareModicon M580, Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum, Modicon Premium (see security notification for specific versions)
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2019-6819
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 63.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2019 | 19:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists which could cause a possible Denial of Service when specific Modbus frames are sent to the controller in the products: Modicon M340 - firmware versions prior to V3.01, Modicon M580 - firmware versions prior to V2.80, All firmware versions of Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-bmeh584040cmodicon_quantum_firmwaremodicon_m580_firmwarebmeh584040bmeh582040cmodicon_premium_firmwaremodicon_m340_bmxp3420102clmodicon_m580_bmep583020modicon_m580_bmep586040modicon_m340_bmxp342000modicon_m580_bmep584040modicon_m580_bmep582020modicon_m340_bmxp341000modicon_m340_bmxp3420302hmodicon_m580_bmep585040cmodicon_m580_bmep584040smodicon_m580_bmep583040modicon_m340_bmxp341000hmodicon_m580_bmep582040modicon_m580_bmep585040modicon_m340_bmxp3420302clmodicon_m580_bmep582040hbmeh586040modicon_m340_bmxp3420302modicon_premiummodicon_m580_bmep584020modicon_m340_bmxp342020modicon_m580_bmep582040smodicon_quantummodicon_m340_bmxp342020hmodicon_m580_bmep581020modicon_m580_bmep586040cbmeh586040cmodicon_m580_bmep581020hmodicon_m580_bmep582020hbmeh582040modicon_m340_bmxp3420102modicon_m340_firmwareModicon Controllers, Modicon M340 - firmware versions prior to V3.01 Modicon M580 - firmware versions prior to V2.80 All firmware versions of Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2023-37899
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jul, 2023 | 19:45
Updated-28 Oct, 2024 | 15:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
feathersjs socket handler allows abusing implicit toString

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. Feathers socket handler did not catch invalid string conversion errors like `const message = ${{ toString: '' }}` which would cause the NodeJS process to crash when sending an unexpected Socket.io message like `socket.emit('find', { toString: '' })`. A fix has been released in versions 5.0.8 and 4.5.18. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-feathersjsfeathersjs
Product-feathersfeathers
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2019-20175
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 66.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Dec, 2019 | 03:27
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ide_dma_cb() in hw/ide/core.c in QEMU 2.4.0 through 4.2.0. The guest system can crash the QEMU process in the host system via a special SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND. It hits an assertion that implies that the size of successful DMA transfers there must be a multiple of 512 (the size of a sector). NOTE: a member of the QEMU security team disputes the significance of this issue because a "privileged guest user has many ways to cause similar DoS effect, without triggering this assert.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aQEMU
Product-qemun/a
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2023-36835
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 17:11
Updated-07 Nov, 2024 | 14:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: QFX10000 Series: All traffic will be dropped after a specific valid IP packet has been received which needs to be routed over a VXLAN tunnel

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10000 Series allows a network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). If a specific valid IP packet is received and that packet needs to be routed over a VXLAN tunnel, this will result in a PFE wedge condition due to which traffic gets impacted. As this is not a crash and restart scenario, this condition will persist until the system is rebooted to recover. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX10000: 20.3 version 20.3R1 and later versions; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S5; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S5; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S1; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R1-S2, 22.3R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-qfx10008qfx10002junosqfx10016qfx10002-60cJunos OSjunos_os
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2022-39288
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-5.99% / 90.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of service in Fastify via Content-Type header

fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js. Affected versions of fastify are subject to a denial of service via malicious use of the Content-Type header. An attacker can send an invalid Content-Type header that can cause the application to crash. This issue has been addressed in commit `fbb07e8d` and will be included in release version 4.8.1. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may manually filter out http content with malicious Content-Type headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fastifyfastify
Product-fastifyfastify
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2017-18650
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2020 | 15:53
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x) software. There is a WifiStateMachine IllegalArgumentException and reboot if a malformed wpa_supplicant.conf is read. The Samsung ID is SVE-2017-9828 (October 2017).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-androidn/a
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2023-32695
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 May, 2023 | 15:44
Updated-13 Jan, 2025 | 21:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insufficient validation when decoding a Socket.IO packet

socket.io parser is a socket.io encoder and decoder written in JavaScript complying with version 5 of socket.io-protocol. A specially crafted Socket.IO packet can trigger an uncaught exception on the Socket.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process. A patch has been released in version 4.2.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-socketsocketio
Product-socket.io-parsersocket.io-parser
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2020-36382
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.29% / 79.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 10:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN Access Server 2.7.3 to 2.8.7 allows remote attackers to trigger an assert during the user authentication phase via incorrect authentication token data in an early phase of the user authentication resulting in a denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/a
Product-openvpn_access_serverOpenVPN Access Server
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2018-7854
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.63% / 81.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2019 | 20:02
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-248 Uncaught Exception vulnerability exists in all versions of the Modicon M580, Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum, and Modicon Premium which could cause a denial of Service when sending invalid debug parameters to the controller over Modbus.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-modicon_quantummodicon_quantum_firmwaremodicon_m580_firmwaremodicon_premium_firmwaremodicon_premiummodicon_m340modicon_m340_firmwaremodicon_m580Modicon M580 Modicon M340 Modicon Quantum Modicon Premium
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2017-12119
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 67.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2018 | 23:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable unhandled exception vulnerability exists in multiple APIs of CPP-Ethereum JSON-RPC. Specially crafted JSON requests can cause an unhandled exception resulting in denial of service. An attacker can send malicious JSON to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ethereumTalos (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-cpp-ethereumCPP-Ethereum
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2024-3393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-78.02% / 98.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Dec, 2024 | 09:44
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 16:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2025-01-20||Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
PAN-OS: Firewall Denial of Service (DoS) in DNS Security Using a Specially Crafted Packet

A Denial of Service vulnerability in the DNS Security feature of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to send a malicious packet through the data plane of the firewall that reboots the firewall. Repeated attempts to trigger this condition will cause the firewall to enter maintenance mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Product-prisma_accesspan-osPAN-OSCloud NGFWPAN-OS
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found